在视觉语言的形式化中对齐语法和语义

C. Gurr
{"title":"在视觉语言的形式化中对齐语法和语义","authors":"C. Gurr","doi":"10.1109/HCC.2001.995238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Often the most effective diagrams are those which are very simple. However there is a strong tendency, particularly prevalent in visual formal modelling and specification languages, to take a diagrammatic language which at core is very simple, and then add many extensions and features to make it more expressive - often making it so expressive that the diagrams produced in the language are no longer readable; or at least, the diagrams are no longer obviously a more effective form of representation than a text-based one. Both the design of effective visual formal modelling and specification languages, and the effective formalisation of (the semantics of) such visual languages requires the unification of results from visual language theory, cognitive science, empirical psychology and graphic design. Integrating results from such diverse fields is a non-trivial task, which may be approached through a decomposition of the study of issues of effectiveness in diagrammatic languages according to analogous understandings of (written and spoken) natural languages.","PeriodicalId":438014,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aligning syntax and semantics in formalisations of visual languages\",\"authors\":\"C. Gurr\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HCC.2001.995238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Often the most effective diagrams are those which are very simple. However there is a strong tendency, particularly prevalent in visual formal modelling and specification languages, to take a diagrammatic language which at core is very simple, and then add many extensions and features to make it more expressive - often making it so expressive that the diagrams produced in the language are no longer readable; or at least, the diagrams are no longer obviously a more effective form of representation than a text-based one. Both the design of effective visual formal modelling and specification languages, and the effective formalisation of (the semantics of) such visual languages requires the unification of results from visual language theory, cognitive science, empirical psychology and graphic design. Integrating results from such diverse fields is a non-trivial task, which may be approached through a decomposition of the study of issues of effectiveness in diagrammatic languages according to analogous understandings of (written and spoken) natural languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HCC.2001.995238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HCC.2001.995238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

通常最有效的图表是那些非常简单的图表。然而,有一种强烈的趋势,特别是在可视化形式化建模和规范语言中,采用一种核心非常简单的图表语言,然后添加许多扩展和特性以使其更具表现力——通常使其如此富有表现力,以至于用该语言生成的图表不再可读;或者至少,图表显然不再是一种比基于文本的更有效的表示形式。无论是设计有效的视觉形式化建模和规范语言,还是对这些视觉语言进行有效的形式化(语义化),都需要将视觉语言理论、认知科学、经验心理学和平面设计的结果统一起来。整合这些不同领域的结果是一项艰巨的任务,可以根据对自然语言(书面和口头)的类似理解,对图解语言的有效性问题进行分解研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aligning syntax and semantics in formalisations of visual languages
Often the most effective diagrams are those which are very simple. However there is a strong tendency, particularly prevalent in visual formal modelling and specification languages, to take a diagrammatic language which at core is very simple, and then add many extensions and features to make it more expressive - often making it so expressive that the diagrams produced in the language are no longer readable; or at least, the diagrams are no longer obviously a more effective form of representation than a text-based one. Both the design of effective visual formal modelling and specification languages, and the effective formalisation of (the semantics of) such visual languages requires the unification of results from visual language theory, cognitive science, empirical psychology and graphic design. Integrating results from such diverse fields is a non-trivial task, which may be approached through a decomposition of the study of issues of effectiveness in diagrammatic languages according to analogous understandings of (written and spoken) natural languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New paradigm for developing software for E-business Chinese whispers. Semiotically mediating between idea and program How children understand concurrent comics: experiences from LOFI and HIFI prototypes The ptolemy II framework for visual languages Processing UML models with visual scripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1