“宇宙大气中的黑洞”:学生黑洞心理模型的实证定性研究

M. Ubben, Johanna Hartmann, Alexander Pusch
{"title":"“宇宙大气中的黑洞”:学生黑洞心理模型的实证定性研究","authors":"M. Ubben, Johanna Hartmann, Alexander Pusch","doi":"10.32374/aej.2022.2.1.029ra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Black holes are both interesting to many students and are part of several school and university curricula. However, it has not yet been documented in detail what kind of mental models of black holes students have. As such, this study qualitatively reports on the mental models of 53 university students, most of them with a non-physics major. The gestalts of the mental models found were mostly disc shaped holes or black spheres, though some funnels or ellipsoids were also described by the students. As for the functionality, students associated attractive functions with a black hole, though more elaborate descriptions such as time dilation or gravitational lensing and Hawking radiation were also named. All university students described a kind of black hole creation, though not all knew about their change in time and only described growth or could not give founded reasons for the change. Several participants showed potential problems by seeing their mental model as a direct replica of reality and assumed that black holes were literally holes. Conceptual problems regarding things “behind” the holes were raised. The results show that many rudimentary properties of black holes are known to university students without explicit education in that field, and a surprising amount of physics quantities were associated with them, although things like density or mass were described inadequately in several cases. Though mental models of black holes were not documented this extensively before, parallels in thinking with mental models in other areas of physics could be observed, making the findings consistent with literature.","PeriodicalId":424141,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy Education Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Holes in the atmosphere of the universe”: An empirical qualitative study on mental models of students regarding black holes\",\"authors\":\"M. Ubben, Johanna Hartmann, Alexander Pusch\",\"doi\":\"10.32374/aej.2022.2.1.029ra\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Black holes are both interesting to many students and are part of several school and university curricula. However, it has not yet been documented in detail what kind of mental models of black holes students have. As such, this study qualitatively reports on the mental models of 53 university students, most of them with a non-physics major. The gestalts of the mental models found were mostly disc shaped holes or black spheres, though some funnels or ellipsoids were also described by the students. As for the functionality, students associated attractive functions with a black hole, though more elaborate descriptions such as time dilation or gravitational lensing and Hawking radiation were also named. All university students described a kind of black hole creation, though not all knew about their change in time and only described growth or could not give founded reasons for the change. Several participants showed potential problems by seeing their mental model as a direct replica of reality and assumed that black holes were literally holes. Conceptual problems regarding things “behind” the holes were raised. The results show that many rudimentary properties of black holes are known to university students without explicit education in that field, and a surprising amount of physics quantities were associated with them, although things like density or mass were described inadequately in several cases. Though mental models of black holes were not documented this extensively before, parallels in thinking with mental models in other areas of physics could be observed, making the findings consistent with literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomy Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomy Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32374/aej.2022.2.1.029ra\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32374/aej.2022.2.1.029ra","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

黑洞对许多学生来说都很有趣,而且是一些学校和大学课程的一部分。然而,目前还没有详细记录学生对黑洞的心理模型是什么样的。因此,本研究定性报告了53名大学生的心理模型,其中大多数是非物理专业的学生。所发现的心理模型的格式塔大多是圆盘形的洞或黑色球体,尽管一些漏斗或椭球也被学生描述。至于功能,学生们将吸引函数与黑洞联系在一起,尽管更详细的描述,如时间膨胀或引力透镜和霍金辐射也被命名。所有的大学生都描述了一种黑洞的形成,但并不是所有人都知道它们的时间变化,只是描述了增长或不能给出有根据的变化原因。一些参与者表现出潜在的问题,他们把自己的心理模型看作是现实的直接复制品,并假设黑洞就是字面上的洞。人们提出了关于洞“后面”事物的概念问题。结果表明,没有接受过该领域明确教育的大学生都知道黑洞的许多基本特性,而且令人惊讶的是,大量的物理量与黑洞有关,尽管在一些情况下,密度或质量等方面的描述不充分。虽然黑洞的心理模型之前没有被广泛记录,但可以观察到其他物理领域的思维与心理模型的相似之处,使这些发现与文献一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Holes in the atmosphere of the universe”: An empirical qualitative study on mental models of students regarding black holes
Black holes are both interesting to many students and are part of several school and university curricula. However, it has not yet been documented in detail what kind of mental models of black holes students have. As such, this study qualitatively reports on the mental models of 53 university students, most of them with a non-physics major. The gestalts of the mental models found were mostly disc shaped holes or black spheres, though some funnels or ellipsoids were also described by the students. As for the functionality, students associated attractive functions with a black hole, though more elaborate descriptions such as time dilation or gravitational lensing and Hawking radiation were also named. All university students described a kind of black hole creation, though not all knew about their change in time and only described growth or could not give founded reasons for the change. Several participants showed potential problems by seeing their mental model as a direct replica of reality and assumed that black holes were literally holes. Conceptual problems regarding things “behind” the holes were raised. The results show that many rudimentary properties of black holes are known to university students without explicit education in that field, and a surprising amount of physics quantities were associated with them, although things like density or mass were described inadequately in several cases. Though mental models of black holes were not documented this extensively before, parallels in thinking with mental models in other areas of physics could be observed, making the findings consistent with literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Remembering a passionate Astronomy Education Researcher An Initial Investigation of Students’ Understanding of Space Exploration Knowing the Universe: Teaching the History and Philosophy of Astronomy Video as a Vehicle for Astronomy Education and Outreach ExMASS: Implementation and evaluation of an authentic, inquiry-based research experience for secondary students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1