防蓝光驱动眼镜镜片的防蓝光效率

Bon-Yeop Koo, Myoung-Hee Lee
{"title":"防蓝光驱动眼镜镜片的防蓝光效率","authors":"Bon-Yeop Koo, Myoung-Hee Lee","doi":"10.51329/mehdioptometry136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Retinal damage caused by blue light can result in glare, decreased visual acuity, and accelerated macular degeneration. In clinical practice, blue light-blocking glasses, such as driving glasses, are used to block blue light effectively. This study was aimed at measuring light transmittance to analyze the blue light-blocking efficiencies of blue light-blocking and driving spectacle lenses manufactured with tinting, coating, and only materials and at distinguishing the difference between the two spectacle lenses. \n  \nMethods: Blue light-blocking and driving spectacle lenses used to measure light transmittance were manufactured with tinting (blue light blocking lenses by tinting or “BTL” and driving spectacle lenses by tinting or “DTL,” respectively), coating (blue light blocking lenses by coating or “BCL” and driving spectacle lenses by coating or “DCL,” respectively), and only materials (blue light blocking lenses by material or “BML” and driving spectacle lenses by material or “DML,” respectively). \n  \nResults: Compared to BTL, DTL had a significantly greater decrease in the light transmission efficiency for visible and blue lights (P < 0.05). The blue light hazard function was lower for BML and DML than for conventional coating lenses in both visible and blue lights, although without significant differences between visible and blue lights (P > 0.05). \n  \nConclusions: The blue light-blocking spectacle lenses had the highest blue light-blocking efficiency when manufactured with tinting, coating, and only materials, in order. With DML, the blue light-blocking efficiency was lower compared to DTL but higher compared to DCL. Therefore, DML could provide a balanced glare control and clear retinal image overall.","PeriodicalId":370751,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypothesis, discovery &amp; innovation in optometry","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blue light-blocking efficiency of blue light-blocking and driving spectacle lenses\",\"authors\":\"Bon-Yeop Koo, Myoung-Hee Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.51329/mehdioptometry136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Retinal damage caused by blue light can result in glare, decreased visual acuity, and accelerated macular degeneration. In clinical practice, blue light-blocking glasses, such as driving glasses, are used to block blue light effectively. This study was aimed at measuring light transmittance to analyze the blue light-blocking efficiencies of blue light-blocking and driving spectacle lenses manufactured with tinting, coating, and only materials and at distinguishing the difference between the two spectacle lenses. \\n  \\nMethods: Blue light-blocking and driving spectacle lenses used to measure light transmittance were manufactured with tinting (blue light blocking lenses by tinting or “BTL” and driving spectacle lenses by tinting or “DTL,” respectively), coating (blue light blocking lenses by coating or “BCL” and driving spectacle lenses by coating or “DCL,” respectively), and only materials (blue light blocking lenses by material or “BML” and driving spectacle lenses by material or “DML,” respectively). \\n  \\nResults: Compared to BTL, DTL had a significantly greater decrease in the light transmission efficiency for visible and blue lights (P < 0.05). The blue light hazard function was lower for BML and DML than for conventional coating lenses in both visible and blue lights, although without significant differences between visible and blue lights (P > 0.05). \\n  \\nConclusions: The blue light-blocking spectacle lenses had the highest blue light-blocking efficiency when manufactured with tinting, coating, and only materials, in order. With DML, the blue light-blocking efficiency was lower compared to DTL but higher compared to DCL. Therefore, DML could provide a balanced glare control and clear retinal image overall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical hypothesis, discovery &amp; innovation in optometry\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical hypothesis, discovery &amp; innovation in optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdioptometry136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypothesis, discovery &amp; innovation in optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdioptometry136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:蓝光引起的视网膜损伤可导致眩光、视力下降和加速黄斑变性。在临床实践中,使用防蓝光眼镜,如驾驶眼镜,可以有效地阻挡蓝光。本研究旨在通过测量透光率,分析有色、镀膜和纯有色材料制造的挡蓝光驱动眼镜镜片的挡蓝光效率,并区分两种镜片的差异。方法:用于测量透光率的防蓝光镜片和驱动镜片分别采用配色(防蓝光镜片分别为“BTL”或“BTL”,驱动镜片分别为“DTL”或“BCL”)、镀膜(防蓝光镜片分别为“BCL”或“DCL”)和纯材料(防蓝光镜片分别为“BML”或“DML”)制造。结果:与BTL相比,DTL对可见光和蓝光的透射效率降低幅度显著(P < 0.05)。BML和DML在可见光和蓝光下的蓝光危害函数均低于常规镀膜镜片,但在可见光和蓝光下无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:配色、镀膜、纯材料配制的防蓝光眼镜镜片防蓝光效率最高。DML的蓝光阻断效率低于DTL,但高于DCL。因此,DML可以提供平衡的眩光控制和整体清晰的视网膜图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blue light-blocking efficiency of blue light-blocking and driving spectacle lenses
Background: Retinal damage caused by blue light can result in glare, decreased visual acuity, and accelerated macular degeneration. In clinical practice, blue light-blocking glasses, such as driving glasses, are used to block blue light effectively. This study was aimed at measuring light transmittance to analyze the blue light-blocking efficiencies of blue light-blocking and driving spectacle lenses manufactured with tinting, coating, and only materials and at distinguishing the difference between the two spectacle lenses.   Methods: Blue light-blocking and driving spectacle lenses used to measure light transmittance were manufactured with tinting (blue light blocking lenses by tinting or “BTL” and driving spectacle lenses by tinting or “DTL,” respectively), coating (blue light blocking lenses by coating or “BCL” and driving spectacle lenses by coating or “DCL,” respectively), and only materials (blue light blocking lenses by material or “BML” and driving spectacle lenses by material or “DML,” respectively).   Results: Compared to BTL, DTL had a significantly greater decrease in the light transmission efficiency for visible and blue lights (P < 0.05). The blue light hazard function was lower for BML and DML than for conventional coating lenses in both visible and blue lights, although without significant differences between visible and blue lights (P > 0.05).   Conclusions: The blue light-blocking spectacle lenses had the highest blue light-blocking efficiency when manufactured with tinting, coating, and only materials, in order. With DML, the blue light-blocking efficiency was lower compared to DTL but higher compared to DCL. Therefore, DML could provide a balanced glare control and clear retinal image overall.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of WDR36 polymorphisms with primary open-angle glaucoma Effects of repeated intravitreal bevacizumab administration on anterior segment parameters and limbal stem cells Hypothetical proposal for the course of retinal blood vessels in the posterior pole—description and its clinical implications Photophysical and photodynamic analysis of different formulations of riboflavin Contralateral eye comparison of the efficacy and safety of two artificial tear formulations for corneal subbasal nerve fiber regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1