Anne Birgitta Nielsen, Ekaterine Pirtskhalava, Ekaterine Basilaia
{"title":"跨文化接触中的仇恨言论","authors":"Anne Birgitta Nielsen, Ekaterine Pirtskhalava, Ekaterine Basilaia","doi":"10.7577/fleks.4570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of hate speech has been a topic of international debate—most frequently in the domains of law, philosophy and language. Different issues linked to changes in society, ranging from the proliferation of social media, innovation and technology and influx of fake news, disinformation and propaganda to the rise of nationalism, far-right movements, increased cross-border movement of people and transnational business have made studying the conceptual and practical aspects of hate speech in different contexts ever more important.\nThe papers in this issue focus on the sociolinguistic aspects of the use of hate speech and its different variants in online communication, offering a much-needed perspective on how hate speech in digital communication can be identified and tackled. For example, Dr. Manana Ruseishvili and Dr. Rusudan Dolidze analyse hate speech in computer-meditated communication, focusing on the polylogal, asynchronic remarks made by members of the public reacting to articles in online media or press releases about the LGBT pride event planned for June 2019. The research carried out by Lilit Bekaryan explores how hateful posts and comments can start among Facebook users, and studies the language means employed in their design based on data from more than ten open Facebook pages managed by popular Armenian figures, such as media experts, journalists, politicians and bloggers. Dr. Tatjana R. Felberg explores the interconnectedness between impoliteness and hate speech in online comments in Croatia and Serbia by applying impoliteness theory and a critical discourse analysis framework. Her research demonstrates that those who post often fluctuate between hate speech and impoliteness. Dr. Ayunts and Dr. Paronyan provide a comparative analysis of manifestations of hate speech and euphemisms in Armenian and British online media outlets and social sites targeting people's sexual orientation with emphasis on the interconnectedness of hate speech and culture.\nThis issue was prepared as part of the project ‘Intercultural encounters in academia and work places in South Caucasus and Norway’ funded by DIKU, the Norwegian Agency for International Cooperation and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education. The project partner universities are Oslo Metropolitan University, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Yerevan State University and Khazar University.","PeriodicalId":179459,"journal":{"name":"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hate speech in intercultural encounters\",\"authors\":\"Anne Birgitta Nielsen, Ekaterine Pirtskhalava, Ekaterine Basilaia\",\"doi\":\"10.7577/fleks.4570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of hate speech has been a topic of international debate—most frequently in the domains of law, philosophy and language. Different issues linked to changes in society, ranging from the proliferation of social media, innovation and technology and influx of fake news, disinformation and propaganda to the rise of nationalism, far-right movements, increased cross-border movement of people and transnational business have made studying the conceptual and practical aspects of hate speech in different contexts ever more important.\\nThe papers in this issue focus on the sociolinguistic aspects of the use of hate speech and its different variants in online communication, offering a much-needed perspective on how hate speech in digital communication can be identified and tackled. For example, Dr. Manana Ruseishvili and Dr. Rusudan Dolidze analyse hate speech in computer-meditated communication, focusing on the polylogal, asynchronic remarks made by members of the public reacting to articles in online media or press releases about the LGBT pride event planned for June 2019. The research carried out by Lilit Bekaryan explores how hateful posts and comments can start among Facebook users, and studies the language means employed in their design based on data from more than ten open Facebook pages managed by popular Armenian figures, such as media experts, journalists, politicians and bloggers. Dr. Tatjana R. Felberg explores the interconnectedness between impoliteness and hate speech in online comments in Croatia and Serbia by applying impoliteness theory and a critical discourse analysis framework. Her research demonstrates that those who post often fluctuate between hate speech and impoliteness. Dr. Ayunts and Dr. Paronyan provide a comparative analysis of manifestations of hate speech and euphemisms in Armenian and British online media outlets and social sites targeting people's sexual orientation with emphasis on the interconnectedness of hate speech and culture.\\nThis issue was prepared as part of the project ‘Intercultural encounters in academia and work places in South Caucasus and Norway’ funded by DIKU, the Norwegian Agency for International Cooperation and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education. The project partner universities are Oslo Metropolitan University, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Yerevan State University and Khazar University.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7577/fleks.4570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/fleks.4570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
仇恨言论问题一直是国际辩论的一个主题,最常见的是在法律、哲学和语言领域。与社会变化相关的不同问题,从社交媒体、创新和技术的扩散以及假新闻、虚假信息和宣传的涌入,到民族主义、极右翼运动的兴起、人员跨境流动和跨国企业的增加,使得研究不同背景下仇恨言论的概念和实践方面变得更加重要。本期的论文重点关注仇恨言论的社会语言学方面及其在网络传播中的不同变体,为如何识别和解决数字传播中的仇恨言论提供了一个急需的视角。例如,Manana Ruseishvili博士和Rusudan Dolidze博士分析了计算机冥想传播中的仇恨言论,重点关注公众对在线媒体或新闻稿中有关2019年6月LGBT骄傲活动的文章作出的多元、非同步的评论。Lilit Bekaryan进行的这项研究探讨了Facebook用户如何开始发布仇恨的帖子和评论,并根据媒体专家、记者、政治家和博主等亚美尼亚知名人士管理的10多个Facebook页面的数据,研究了这些帖子和评论使用的语言手段。Tatjana R. Felberg博士通过应用不礼貌理论和批判性话语分析框架,探讨了克罗地亚和塞尔维亚在线评论中不礼貌和仇恨言论之间的相互联系。她的研究表明,发帖的人经常在仇恨言论和不礼貌之间波动。Ayunts博士与Paronyan博士对比分析亚美尼亚与英国网路媒体与社交网站针对性倾向的仇恨言论与委婉语,并强调仇恨言论与文化的相互关联。本期杂志是作为“南高加索和挪威学术界和工作场所的跨文化接触”项目的一部分编写的,该项目由挪威高等教育国际合作和提高质量机构DIKU资助。项目合作大学包括奥斯陆城市大学、第比利斯国立大学、埃里温国立大学和哈扎尔大学。
The issue of hate speech has been a topic of international debate—most frequently in the domains of law, philosophy and language. Different issues linked to changes in society, ranging from the proliferation of social media, innovation and technology and influx of fake news, disinformation and propaganda to the rise of nationalism, far-right movements, increased cross-border movement of people and transnational business have made studying the conceptual and practical aspects of hate speech in different contexts ever more important.
The papers in this issue focus on the sociolinguistic aspects of the use of hate speech and its different variants in online communication, offering a much-needed perspective on how hate speech in digital communication can be identified and tackled. For example, Dr. Manana Ruseishvili and Dr. Rusudan Dolidze analyse hate speech in computer-meditated communication, focusing on the polylogal, asynchronic remarks made by members of the public reacting to articles in online media or press releases about the LGBT pride event planned for June 2019. The research carried out by Lilit Bekaryan explores how hateful posts and comments can start among Facebook users, and studies the language means employed in their design based on data from more than ten open Facebook pages managed by popular Armenian figures, such as media experts, journalists, politicians and bloggers. Dr. Tatjana R. Felberg explores the interconnectedness between impoliteness and hate speech in online comments in Croatia and Serbia by applying impoliteness theory and a critical discourse analysis framework. Her research demonstrates that those who post often fluctuate between hate speech and impoliteness. Dr. Ayunts and Dr. Paronyan provide a comparative analysis of manifestations of hate speech and euphemisms in Armenian and British online media outlets and social sites targeting people's sexual orientation with emphasis on the interconnectedness of hate speech and culture.
This issue was prepared as part of the project ‘Intercultural encounters in academia and work places in South Caucasus and Norway’ funded by DIKU, the Norwegian Agency for International Cooperation and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education. The project partner universities are Oslo Metropolitan University, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Yerevan State University and Khazar University.