牙齿颜色的选择:视觉和分光光度法的比较

Vladimir Valenzuela-Aránguiz, Sofía Bofill-Fonbote, Javier Crisóstomo-Muñoz, Francisco Pavez-Ovalle, Jacqueline Brunet-Echavarría
{"title":"牙齿颜色的选择:视觉和分光光度法的比较","authors":"Vladimir Valenzuela-Aránguiz,&nbsp;Sofía Bofill-Fonbote,&nbsp;Javier Crisóstomo-Muñoz,&nbsp;Francisco Pavez-Ovalle,&nbsp;Jacqueline Brunet-Echavarría","doi":"10.1016/j.piro.2016.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In cosmetic dentistry the selection of colour can be performed by visual or instrumental methods. The former is subjective, influenced by multiple factors and widely used by dentists, whilst the latter, using a spectrophotometer, is objective and simple but little used.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the results in the selection of colour by a visual method and using the Easyshade Compact spectrophotometer, to verify whether there are differences between them.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>A total of 50 dentists, 25 men and 25 women, were asked to select the colour of a healthy anterior tooth using the 3D Master Vitapan, and the results were compared with those obtained when using the Easyshade Compact spectrophotometer. The data obtained were analysed using the Chi-squared statistical test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The colour obtained by the visual colour selection matched that obtained with spectrophotometer by 18% of dentists. The colour selection by the visual method was different to that obtained with the spectrophotometer for 76% of women and 88% of men.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are statistically significant differences between the selection of colour with the visual method and with spectrophotometer (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.0005). Gender does not seem to be a determining factor in the selection of colour (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.232).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21203,"journal":{"name":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 163-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2016.05.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selección de color dentario: comparación de los métodos visual y espectrofotométrico\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Valenzuela-Aránguiz,&nbsp;Sofía Bofill-Fonbote,&nbsp;Javier Crisóstomo-Muñoz,&nbsp;Francisco Pavez-Ovalle,&nbsp;Jacqueline Brunet-Echavarría\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.piro.2016.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In cosmetic dentistry the selection of colour can be performed by visual or instrumental methods. The former is subjective, influenced by multiple factors and widely used by dentists, whilst the latter, using a spectrophotometer, is objective and simple but little used.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the results in the selection of colour by a visual method and using the Easyshade Compact spectrophotometer, to verify whether there are differences between them.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>A total of 50 dentists, 25 men and 25 women, were asked to select the colour of a healthy anterior tooth using the 3D Master Vitapan, and the results were compared with those obtained when using the Easyshade Compact spectrophotometer. The data obtained were analysed using the Chi-squared statistical test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The colour obtained by the visual colour selection matched that obtained with spectrophotometer by 18% of dentists. The colour selection by the visual method was different to that obtained with the spectrophotometer for 76% of women and 88% of men.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are statistically significant differences between the selection of colour with the visual method and with spectrophotometer (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.0005). Gender does not seem to be a determining factor in the selection of colour (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.232).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 163-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2016.05.004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S071853911630012X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S071853911630012X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在牙科美容中,颜色的选择可以通过目测或仪器方法进行。前者是主观的,受多种因素的影响,被牙医广泛使用,而后者使用分光光度计,是客观和简单的,但很少使用。目的比较目测法和易遮紧凑型分光光度计的选色结果,验证两者是否存在差异。材料与方法共50名牙医,其中25名男性和25名女性,被要求使用3D Master Vitapan选择健康前牙的颜色,并将结果与使用Easyshade Compact分光光度计获得的结果进行比较。所得资料采用卡方统计检验进行分析。结果目视选色法测得的颜色与分光光度计测得的颜色匹配率为18%。76%的女性和88%的男性通过视觉方法获得的颜色选择与用分光光度计获得的不同。结论目测法与分光光度计法对颜色的选择差异有统计学意义(P <.0005)。性别似乎不是颜色选择的决定性因素(P <.232)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selección de color dentario: comparación de los métodos visual y espectrofotométrico

Introduction

In cosmetic dentistry the selection of colour can be performed by visual or instrumental methods. The former is subjective, influenced by multiple factors and widely used by dentists, whilst the latter, using a spectrophotometer, is objective and simple but little used.

Objective

To compare the results in the selection of colour by a visual method and using the Easyshade Compact spectrophotometer, to verify whether there are differences between them.

Material and method

A total of 50 dentists, 25 men and 25 women, were asked to select the colour of a healthy anterior tooth using the 3D Master Vitapan, and the results were compared with those obtained when using the Easyshade Compact spectrophotometer. The data obtained were analysed using the Chi-squared statistical test.

Results

The colour obtained by the visual colour selection matched that obtained with spectrophotometer by 18% of dentists. The colour selection by the visual method was different to that obtained with the spectrophotometer for 76% of women and 88% of men.

Conclusions

There are statistically significant differences between the selection of colour with the visual method and with spectrophotometer (P < .0005). Gender does not seem to be a determining factor in the selection of colour (P < .232).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flujo salival y caries radicular en adultos mayores autovalentes Necesidad de tratamiento periodontal en adolescentes de 12 años de colegios municipalizados en Valdivia–Chile 2014: estudio transversal Impacto de la hipomineralización incisivo molar en la experiencia de caries en escolares de 6-12 años en Santiago, Chile Repigmentación melánica de la melanosis gingival. Revisión sistemática Marsupialización modificada de ránula gigante intraoral: reporte de caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1