论ip级拓扑测量中的目的集

Yu Zhang, Binxing Fang, Hongli Zhang
{"title":"论ip级拓扑测量中的目的集","authors":"Yu Zhang, Binxing Fang, Hongli Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICN.2008.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a thorough investigation of four issues with the destination set in IP-level topology measurement. (1) To evaluate the completeness of the destination set, we measured by brute force and found that a half of edges will be missed by the uniform random selection (URS) method which was adopted by well-known CAIDA' skitter. (2) Two potential reasons for edge missing, the short-term routing dynamics and the subnetting technique, were investigated with the last-hop selection method and the bisection selection method respectively. And the results showed that the subnetting technique is the main reason. (3) To select destinations efficiently, we presented the minimum cover selection (MCS) method which performed better than the URS method on 75% of networks over three months. (4) Finally, to investigate the bias of topology characterization, we measured a destination set larger than before and discovered a Chinese topology whose size is 5 times as large as that discovered by skitter. The comparison between characteristics of skitter's topology and ours indicated that the small destination set trends to miss the information on marginal networks.","PeriodicalId":250085,"journal":{"name":"Seventh International Conference on Networking (icn 2008)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Destination Set in IP-Level Topology Measurement\",\"authors\":\"Yu Zhang, Binxing Fang, Hongli Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICN.2008.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a thorough investigation of four issues with the destination set in IP-level topology measurement. (1) To evaluate the completeness of the destination set, we measured by brute force and found that a half of edges will be missed by the uniform random selection (URS) method which was adopted by well-known CAIDA' skitter. (2) Two potential reasons for edge missing, the short-term routing dynamics and the subnetting technique, were investigated with the last-hop selection method and the bisection selection method respectively. And the results showed that the subnetting technique is the main reason. (3) To select destinations efficiently, we presented the minimum cover selection (MCS) method which performed better than the URS method on 75% of networks over three months. (4) Finally, to investigate the bias of topology characterization, we measured a destination set larger than before and discovered a Chinese topology whose size is 5 times as large as that discovered by skitter. The comparison between characteristics of skitter's topology and ours indicated that the small destination set trends to miss the information on marginal networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seventh International Conference on Networking (icn 2008)\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seventh International Conference on Networking (icn 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICN.2008.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventh International Conference on Networking (icn 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICN.2008.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对ip级拓扑测量中目标集的四个问题进行了深入的研究。(1)为了评估目标集的完备性,我们采用蛮力方法进行测量,发现采用CAIDA的skitter算法所采用的均匀随机选择(URS)方法会丢失一半的边缘。(2)分别用最后一跳选择法和对分选择法研究了短时间路由动态和子网划分技术两种可能导致边缘缺失的原因。结果表明,子网划分技术是造成这种情况的主要原因。(3)为了有效地选择目的地,我们提出了最小覆盖选择(MCS)方法,该方法在75%的网络上优于URS方法。(4)最后,为了研究拓扑表征的偏差,我们测量了一个比以前更大的目标集,发现了一个中文拓扑,其大小是skitter发现的5倍。通过对两种网络拓扑特征的比较,发现小目标集有遗漏边缘网络信息的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Destination Set in IP-Level Topology Measurement
We present a thorough investigation of four issues with the destination set in IP-level topology measurement. (1) To evaluate the completeness of the destination set, we measured by brute force and found that a half of edges will be missed by the uniform random selection (URS) method which was adopted by well-known CAIDA' skitter. (2) Two potential reasons for edge missing, the short-term routing dynamics and the subnetting technique, were investigated with the last-hop selection method and the bisection selection method respectively. And the results showed that the subnetting technique is the main reason. (3) To select destinations efficiently, we presented the minimum cover selection (MCS) method which performed better than the URS method on 75% of networks over three months. (4) Finally, to investigate the bias of topology characterization, we measured a destination set larger than before and discovered a Chinese topology whose size is 5 times as large as that discovered by skitter. The comparison between characteristics of skitter's topology and ours indicated that the small destination set trends to miss the information on marginal networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Application Layer Multicast for Collaborative Scenarios: The OMCAST Protocol Reduce Time Synchronization Cost for High Latency and Resource-Constrained Sensor Networks Restoration Mechanism for the N2R Topological Routing Algorithm A Hierarchical Game for Uplink CDMA Transmissions with Random Active Users Multicast Voice Transmission over Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: Issues and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1