{"title":"为什么法律系学生坚持认为《统一商法典》第二条只适用于商人,我们能做些什么?","authors":"S. Burnham","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1952929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The title says it all - this article addresses a phenomenon all law school professors encounter in the courses in Contracts and Sales; it is also found in the courts and the profession. While the solution may partly be found by creating greater awareness of the problem, the article urges that it be addressed head-on through an express provision in Revised Article 2. This, alas, was not done.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Do Law Students Insist that Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code Applies Only to Merchants and What Can We Do About it?\",\"authors\":\"S. Burnham\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1952929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The title says it all - this article addresses a phenomenon all law school professors encounter in the courses in Contracts and Sales; it is also found in the courts and the profession. While the solution may partly be found by creating greater awareness of the problem, the article urges that it be addressed head-on through an express provision in Revised Article 2. This, alas, was not done.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1952929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1952929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why Do Law Students Insist that Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code Applies Only to Merchants and What Can We Do About it?
The title says it all - this article addresses a phenomenon all law school professors encounter in the courses in Contracts and Sales; it is also found in the courts and the profession. While the solution may partly be found by creating greater awareness of the problem, the article urges that it be addressed head-on through an express provision in Revised Article 2. This, alas, was not done.