小学实验观察教材插图与问题的比较分析——以2009年与2015年修订课程为例

Taek-Sung Kwon, Yong-Gwon Kim
{"title":"小学实验观察教材插图与问题的比较分析——以2009年与2015年修订课程为例","authors":"Taek-Sung Kwon, Yong-Gwon Kim","doi":"10.13000/jfmse.2021.10.33.5.1172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared and analyzed the types and roles of illustrations, and the s in the questions in the experimental observation textbooks for 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th graders of the 2009 and 2015 revised curriculum. This study provide basic data that can effectively utilize the textbooks of the 2015 revised curriculum by presenting the changes, trends of the textbooks according to the revision of the curriculum and suggestions to help develop the experimental observation textbooks of the revised curriculum in the future. The results of comparing and analyzing experimental observation textbooks for 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th graders of the 2009 revised curriculum and 2015 revised curriculum are as follows. First, the proportion of photographs in the types of illustrations is the highest at 63.6% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 58.5% in the 2015 revised curriculum, which is to give students a more realistic scientific experience through high objectivity and clarity. Second, the proportion of learning theorem in the roles of illustrations is the highest at 40.9% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 67.8% in the 2015 revised curriculum because experimental observation textbooks have the quality of auxiliary textbooks. Third, In terms of the science process skills in the questions, the proportion of the basic science process skills is the highest at 74.2% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 79.5% in the 2015 revised curriculum. Among the individual items of the science process skills, the proportion of observations is the highest at 32.2% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 34.4% in the 2015 revised curriculum.","PeriodicalId":148968,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FISHRIES AND MARINE SCIENCES EDUCATION","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparative Analysis of Illustrations and Questions of Elementary School Experimental Observation Textbooks -Focused on 2009 and 2015 Revised Curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Taek-Sung Kwon, Yong-Gwon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.13000/jfmse.2021.10.33.5.1172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compared and analyzed the types and roles of illustrations, and the s in the questions in the experimental observation textbooks for 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th graders of the 2009 and 2015 revised curriculum. This study provide basic data that can effectively utilize the textbooks of the 2015 revised curriculum by presenting the changes, trends of the textbooks according to the revision of the curriculum and suggestions to help develop the experimental observation textbooks of the revised curriculum in the future. The results of comparing and analyzing experimental observation textbooks for 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th graders of the 2009 revised curriculum and 2015 revised curriculum are as follows. First, the proportion of photographs in the types of illustrations is the highest at 63.6% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 58.5% in the 2015 revised curriculum, which is to give students a more realistic scientific experience through high objectivity and clarity. Second, the proportion of learning theorem in the roles of illustrations is the highest at 40.9% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 67.8% in the 2015 revised curriculum because experimental observation textbooks have the quality of auxiliary textbooks. Third, In terms of the science process skills in the questions, the proportion of the basic science process skills is the highest at 74.2% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 79.5% in the 2015 revised curriculum. Among the individual items of the science process skills, the proportion of observations is the highest at 32.2% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 34.4% in the 2015 revised curriculum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF FISHRIES AND MARINE SCIENCES EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF FISHRIES AND MARINE SCIENCES EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2021.10.33.5.1172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FISHRIES AND MARINE SCIENCES EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2021.10.33.5.1172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对比分析了2009年和2015年修订课程中三、四、五、六年级实验观察教材中插图的类型和作用,以及问题中的s。本研究通过提出课程修订后教材的变化、趋势以及对未来课程修订实验观察教材开发的建议,为有效利用2015年修订课程教材提供基础数据。对2009年修订课程和2015年修订课程的三、四、五、六年级实验观察教材进行对比分析的结果如下:首先,图片在插图类型中所占比例最高,在2009年修订的课程中为63.6%,在2015年修订的课程中为58.5%,这是为了通过高度的客观性和清晰度给学生更真实的科学体验。其次,由于实验观察教材具有辅助教材的质量,在2009年修订课程中,学习定理在插图角色中的比例最高,为40.9%,在2015年修订课程中为67.8%。第三,在问题中的科学过程技能方面,基础科学过程技能的比例最高,在2009年修订课程中为74.2%,在2015年修订课程中为79.5%。在科学过程技能的单项项目中,观察的比例最高,在2009年修订课程中为32.2%,在2015年修订课程中为34.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Comparative Analysis of Illustrations and Questions of Elementary School Experimental Observation Textbooks -Focused on 2009 and 2015 Revised Curriculum
This study compared and analyzed the types and roles of illustrations, and the s in the questions in the experimental observation textbooks for 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th graders of the 2009 and 2015 revised curriculum. This study provide basic data that can effectively utilize the textbooks of the 2015 revised curriculum by presenting the changes, trends of the textbooks according to the revision of the curriculum and suggestions to help develop the experimental observation textbooks of the revised curriculum in the future. The results of comparing and analyzing experimental observation textbooks for 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th graders of the 2009 revised curriculum and 2015 revised curriculum are as follows. First, the proportion of photographs in the types of illustrations is the highest at 63.6% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 58.5% in the 2015 revised curriculum, which is to give students a more realistic scientific experience through high objectivity and clarity. Second, the proportion of learning theorem in the roles of illustrations is the highest at 40.9% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 67.8% in the 2015 revised curriculum because experimental observation textbooks have the quality of auxiliary textbooks. Third, In terms of the science process skills in the questions, the proportion of the basic science process skills is the highest at 74.2% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 79.5% in the 2015 revised curriculum. Among the individual items of the science process skills, the proportion of observations is the highest at 32.2% in the 2009 revised curriculum and 34.4% in the 2015 revised curriculum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Asymmetric Price Transmission between Producer and Wholesale Markets of Aquacultured Rockfish A Study on the Efficiency of Seafood Processing Companies Based on Super-SBM The Effects of Science Class using Collative Variables on Elementary Students’ Curiosity, Interest about Science and Attitude Effect of Clinical Practice Stress and Anger Expression on Assertive Behavior in Nursing Students A Study on the Reduced temperature and Improvement of Visibility during Ship’s fire of Draft Curtain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1