解释制度知觉:自我发展在制度企业家精神中的作用

Joel Gehman
{"title":"解释制度知觉:自我发展在制度企业家精神中的作用","authors":"Joel Gehman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1331733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its success in bringing agency back into organizational studies, some argue that institutional entrepreneurship leaves unresolved the paradox of embedded agency, which asks how actors are able to change the very institutions which have conditioned them. I propose dissolution of this paradox by focusing on the overlooked role of seeing. From this perspective institutional conditions are both constitutive of and constituted by an actor's perceptions. Once the individual is seen as a socius, an ego-alter dialectic, understanding the development of the self becomes central to explaining why some actors see one combination of interests-opportunities-resources while others do not, even when embedded in the same institutional matrix. The paper introduces organization scholars to Loevinger's (1976) ego development, a theory and measure of the developmental sequences of the self, and one of the most extensively validated and widely used constructs in the field of psychology. Using ego development I show that actors vary systematically in their ability to perceive conditions which enable institutional change.","PeriodicalId":268317,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Individuals (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining Institutional Perception: The Role of Ego Development in Institutional Entrepreneurship\",\"authors\":\"Joel Gehman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1331733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite its success in bringing agency back into organizational studies, some argue that institutional entrepreneurship leaves unresolved the paradox of embedded agency, which asks how actors are able to change the very institutions which have conditioned them. I propose dissolution of this paradox by focusing on the overlooked role of seeing. From this perspective institutional conditions are both constitutive of and constituted by an actor's perceptions. Once the individual is seen as a socius, an ego-alter dialectic, understanding the development of the self becomes central to explaining why some actors see one combination of interests-opportunities-resources while others do not, even when embedded in the same institutional matrix. The paper introduces organization scholars to Loevinger's (1976) ego development, a theory and measure of the developmental sequences of the self, and one of the most extensively validated and widely used constructs in the field of psychology. Using ego development I show that actors vary systematically in their ability to perceive conditions which enable institutional change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Individuals (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Individuals (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1331733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Individuals (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1331733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管制度性企业家精神成功地将能动性带回了组织研究中,但一些人认为,制度性企业家精神没有解决嵌入能动性的悖论,即行动者如何能够改变制约他们的制度。我建议通过关注“看”这个被忽视的角色来消解这个悖论。从这个角度来看,制度条件既构成行为者的认知,又由行为者的认知构成。一旦个人被视为一个社会,一个自我改变的辩证法,理解自我的发展就成为解释为什么有些行为者看到利益-机会-资源的组合,而其他人却没有的核心,即使嵌入在相同的制度矩阵中。本文向组织学者介绍了Loevinger(1976)的自我发展理论,这是一种自我发展序列的理论和测量方法,也是心理学领域最广泛验证和广泛使用的结构之一。通过自我发展,我展示了行为者在感知促成制度变革的条件的能力上有系统的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explaining Institutional Perception: The Role of Ego Development in Institutional Entrepreneurship
Despite its success in bringing agency back into organizational studies, some argue that institutional entrepreneurship leaves unresolved the paradox of embedded agency, which asks how actors are able to change the very institutions which have conditioned them. I propose dissolution of this paradox by focusing on the overlooked role of seeing. From this perspective institutional conditions are both constitutive of and constituted by an actor's perceptions. Once the individual is seen as a socius, an ego-alter dialectic, understanding the development of the self becomes central to explaining why some actors see one combination of interests-opportunities-resources while others do not, even when embedded in the same institutional matrix. The paper introduces organization scholars to Loevinger's (1976) ego development, a theory and measure of the developmental sequences of the self, and one of the most extensively validated and widely used constructs in the field of psychology. Using ego development I show that actors vary systematically in their ability to perceive conditions which enable institutional change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial Hustle: Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Entrepreneurial Hustle Entrepreneurial Education and Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation: An Experts’ Perspective. An Empirical Delphi Study Women as Independent Workers in the Gig Economy Ethnicity and Tax Filing Behavior A Cautionary Note on Micro-credentialing in Entrepreneurship Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1