自动癫痫发作检测:图F特征与图核

Mohammad Hassan Ahmad Yarandi, Mahdi Amani Tehrani, S. H. Sardouie
{"title":"自动癫痫发作检测:图F特征与图核","authors":"Mohammad Hassan Ahmad Yarandi, Mahdi Amani Tehrani, S. H. Sardouie","doi":"10.1109/ICSPIS54653.2021.9729363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to WHO 2019 announcement, around 50 million people are suffering from epilepsy worldwide. As epilepsy causes some seizures in the brain, seizure detection can play an essential role in treating patients. In this paper, we concentrated on different graph-based methods intending to classify seizure and non-seizure states of the brain based on recorded EEG signals. We worked on Temple University Hospital (TUH) dataset which includes both focal and generalized seizures. Our goal was to reach a comprehensive comparison between these methods. Three methods were discussed: graph features, graph kernels, and graph multi-kernels. We considered each EEG channel as a node in the graph model. Also, graph edges were built through functional connectivity between every two nodes' signals. Therefore, we constructed one graph for each second of every patients' recorded EEG. Then, by using constructed graphs, we extracted some features from them, or calculated kernel matrix for each couple of them which reflects the similarity between graphs. In the multi-kernel method, these two approaches gathered together. After comparing the outcomes, we found kernel and multi-kernel methods more effective on this dataset. The best result is attained by multi-kernel method which has an accuracy of 72.1 % and a sensitivity of 71.9%.","PeriodicalId":286966,"journal":{"name":"2021 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic Epileptic Seizure Detection: Graph F eatures Versus Graph Kernels\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hassan Ahmad Yarandi, Mahdi Amani Tehrani, S. H. Sardouie\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSPIS54653.2021.9729363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to WHO 2019 announcement, around 50 million people are suffering from epilepsy worldwide. As epilepsy causes some seizures in the brain, seizure detection can play an essential role in treating patients. In this paper, we concentrated on different graph-based methods intending to classify seizure and non-seizure states of the brain based on recorded EEG signals. We worked on Temple University Hospital (TUH) dataset which includes both focal and generalized seizures. Our goal was to reach a comprehensive comparison between these methods. Three methods were discussed: graph features, graph kernels, and graph multi-kernels. We considered each EEG channel as a node in the graph model. Also, graph edges were built through functional connectivity between every two nodes' signals. Therefore, we constructed one graph for each second of every patients' recorded EEG. Then, by using constructed graphs, we extracted some features from them, or calculated kernel matrix for each couple of them which reflects the similarity between graphs. In the multi-kernel method, these two approaches gathered together. After comparing the outcomes, we found kernel and multi-kernel methods more effective on this dataset. The best result is attained by multi-kernel method which has an accuracy of 72.1 % and a sensitivity of 71.9%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPIS54653.2021.9729363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPIS54653.2021.9729363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据世卫组织2019年的公告,全世界约有5000万人患有癫痫。由于癫痫会引起大脑的一些癫痫发作,癫痫发作检测在治疗患者中起着至关重要的作用。在本文中,我们集中研究了不同的基于图的方法,旨在根据记录的脑电图信号对大脑的癫痫发作和非癫痫发作状态进行分类。我们研究了天普大学医院(TUH)的数据集,其中包括局灶性和全身性癫痫发作。我们的目标是对这些方法进行全面的比较。讨论了图特征、图核和图多核三种方法。我们将每个脑电信号通道视为图模型中的一个节点。此外,通过每两个节点信号之间的功能连通性构建图边。因此,我们为每个患者记录的脑电图每秒钟构建一张图。然后,利用构造好的图,从图中提取一些特征,或者计算每一对图的核矩阵来反映图之间的相似度。在多核方法中,这两种方法结合在一起。通过对结果的比较,我们发现核和多核方法在该数据集上更有效。结果表明,多核法的准确率为72.1%,灵敏度为71.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automatic Epileptic Seizure Detection: Graph F eatures Versus Graph Kernels
According to WHO 2019 announcement, around 50 million people are suffering from epilepsy worldwide. As epilepsy causes some seizures in the brain, seizure detection can play an essential role in treating patients. In this paper, we concentrated on different graph-based methods intending to classify seizure and non-seizure states of the brain based on recorded EEG signals. We worked on Temple University Hospital (TUH) dataset which includes both focal and generalized seizures. Our goal was to reach a comprehensive comparison between these methods. Three methods were discussed: graph features, graph kernels, and graph multi-kernels. We considered each EEG channel as a node in the graph model. Also, graph edges were built through functional connectivity between every two nodes' signals. Therefore, we constructed one graph for each second of every patients' recorded EEG. Then, by using constructed graphs, we extracted some features from them, or calculated kernel matrix for each couple of them which reflects the similarity between graphs. In the multi-kernel method, these two approaches gathered together. After comparing the outcomes, we found kernel and multi-kernel methods more effective on this dataset. The best result is attained by multi-kernel method which has an accuracy of 72.1 % and a sensitivity of 71.9%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Rolling BearingBased on Deep Transfer Learning Using Time-Frequency Representation Wind Energy Potential Approximation with Various Metaheuristic Optimization Techniques Deployment Listening to Sounds of Silence for Audio replay attack detection Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Prefrontal Cortex Alters Functional Brain Network Architecture: Graph Theoretical Analysis Anomaly Detection and Resilience-Oriented Countermeasures against Cyberattacks in Smart Grids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1