某汽车制造厂支持方法时间测量的两种方法比较

Vyas Padmanabhan, Jared Harvey, Asit Singh, Jeff Gray, Sanford White
{"title":"某汽车制造厂支持方法时间测量的两种方法比较","authors":"Vyas Padmanabhan, Jared Harvey, Asit Singh, Jeff Gray, Sanford White","doi":"10.1145/3564746.3587008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a manufacturing factory, eliminating seconds off a task that is repeated often can reduce the overall manufacturing time and improve the profitability of each unit produced. It is advantageous to understand the average amount of time required to complete each task. In order to scientifically determine the desired time required to complete a task, the individual subtasks also can be timed. This can be made more efficient by automating the process of recording the basic physical motions of factory workers that are involved in a task. Our paper shows how it is possible to use a machine learning based approach to classify the basic motions. This paper describes two approaches that we implemented in order to automate the process of motion classification. We contrast the two approaches and analyze the tradeoffs between each approach. The context for the application of our project is Mercedes-Benz US International, a large automotive manufacturing facility in the Southeastern United States. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of the two approaches and future work that can address these issues.","PeriodicalId":322431,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Southeast Conference","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Two Approaches to Support Methods Time Measurement in an Automotive Factory\",\"authors\":\"Vyas Padmanabhan, Jared Harvey, Asit Singh, Jeff Gray, Sanford White\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3564746.3587008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a manufacturing factory, eliminating seconds off a task that is repeated often can reduce the overall manufacturing time and improve the profitability of each unit produced. It is advantageous to understand the average amount of time required to complete each task. In order to scientifically determine the desired time required to complete a task, the individual subtasks also can be timed. This can be made more efficient by automating the process of recording the basic physical motions of factory workers that are involved in a task. Our paper shows how it is possible to use a machine learning based approach to classify the basic motions. This paper describes two approaches that we implemented in order to automate the process of motion classification. We contrast the two approaches and analyze the tradeoffs between each approach. The context for the application of our project is Mercedes-Benz US International, a large automotive manufacturing facility in the Southeastern United States. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of the two approaches and future work that can address these issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Southeast Conference\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Southeast Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564746.3587008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Southeast Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564746.3587008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在制造工厂中,消除经常重复的任务的几秒钟可以减少总体制造时间并提高每个生产单元的盈利能力。了解完成每项任务所需的平均时间是有益的。为了科学地确定完成一项任务所需的所需时间,还可以对各个子任务进行计时。通过自动化记录工厂工人从事某项任务时的基本身体动作,可以提高工作效率。我们的论文展示了如何使用基于机器学习的方法对基本运动进行分类。本文介绍了实现运动分类过程自动化的两种方法。我们对比了这两种方法,并分析了每种方法之间的权衡。本项目的应用背景是梅赛德斯-奔驰美国国际公司,这是一家位于美国东南部的大型汽车制造工厂。此外,我们还讨论了这两种方法的局限性以及可以解决这些问题的未来工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Two Approaches to Support Methods Time Measurement in an Automotive Factory
In a manufacturing factory, eliminating seconds off a task that is repeated often can reduce the overall manufacturing time and improve the profitability of each unit produced. It is advantageous to understand the average amount of time required to complete each task. In order to scientifically determine the desired time required to complete a task, the individual subtasks also can be timed. This can be made more efficient by automating the process of recording the basic physical motions of factory workers that are involved in a task. Our paper shows how it is possible to use a machine learning based approach to classify the basic motions. This paper describes two approaches that we implemented in order to automate the process of motion classification. We contrast the two approaches and analyze the tradeoffs between each approach. The context for the application of our project is Mercedes-Benz US International, a large automotive manufacturing facility in the Southeastern United States. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of the two approaches and future work that can address these issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scan Stack: A Search-based Concurrent Stack for GPU Mobility-based Optimal Relay Node Selection for IoT-oriented SDWSN Conti Ransomware Development Evaluation News Consumption Among CS Majors: Habits, Perceptions, and Challenges Analysis of ECDSA's Computational Impact on IoT Network Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1