{"title":"规范、咨询网络与共同经济治理:巴黎商事法庭股东冲突案例","authors":"E. Lazega, L. Mounier, Paola Tubaro","doi":"10.4337/9780857931771.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Businesses are usually very keen to participate in the governance of their markets (Lazega and Mounier, 2002, 2003; Falconi et al., 2005). In this chapter, we combine a sociological perspective on joint governance of markets with an economic perspective, such as that of Dixit (2009) that deals with issues of social optimality of private or public governance and enforcement institutions. Institutional and neo-institutional economic theory often separate official governance institutions from private self-governance (Greif, 1996; Ellickson, 1991; Milgrom et al., 1990; Williamson, 1985). At the inter-organizational level, at least two different sociological traditions also deal with the issue of self and exogenous governance of markets, comparing the formal and often exogenous aspects with informal and endogenous ones (...).","PeriodicalId":325508,"journal":{"name":"Sciences Po publications","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Norms, advice networks and joint economic governance: the case of conflicts among shareholders at the Commercial Court of Paris\",\"authors\":\"E. Lazega, L. Mounier, Paola Tubaro\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9780857931771.00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Businesses are usually very keen to participate in the governance of their markets (Lazega and Mounier, 2002, 2003; Falconi et al., 2005). In this chapter, we combine a sociological perspective on joint governance of markets with an economic perspective, such as that of Dixit (2009) that deals with issues of social optimality of private or public governance and enforcement institutions. Institutional and neo-institutional economic theory often separate official governance institutions from private self-governance (Greif, 1996; Ellickson, 1991; Milgrom et al., 1990; Williamson, 1985). At the inter-organizational level, at least two different sociological traditions also deal with the issue of self and exogenous governance of markets, comparing the formal and often exogenous aspects with informal and endogenous ones (...).\",\"PeriodicalId\":325508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sciences Po publications\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sciences Po publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931771.00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sciences Po publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931771.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
企业通常非常热衷于参与其市场的治理(Lazega和Mounier, 2002,2003;Falconi et al., 2005)。在本章中,我们将市场联合治理的社会学视角与经济学视角相结合,例如迪克西特(2009)处理私人或公共治理和执行机构的社会最优性问题。制度和新制度经济理论经常将官方治理机构与私人自治分开(Greif, 1996;Ellickson, 1991;Milgrom et al., 1990;威廉姆森,1985)。在组织间层面,至少有两种不同的社会学传统也处理市场的自我和外生治理问题,将正式的和通常是外生的方面与非正式的和内生的方面进行比较(……)。
Norms, advice networks and joint economic governance: the case of conflicts among shareholders at the Commercial Court of Paris
Businesses are usually very keen to participate in the governance of their markets (Lazega and Mounier, 2002, 2003; Falconi et al., 2005). In this chapter, we combine a sociological perspective on joint governance of markets with an economic perspective, such as that of Dixit (2009) that deals with issues of social optimality of private or public governance and enforcement institutions. Institutional and neo-institutional economic theory often separate official governance institutions from private self-governance (Greif, 1996; Ellickson, 1991; Milgrom et al., 1990; Williamson, 1985). At the inter-organizational level, at least two different sociological traditions also deal with the issue of self and exogenous governance of markets, comparing the formal and often exogenous aspects with informal and endogenous ones (...).