第10章卡库马难民营:知识与希望所在

Staci Martin, D. Warsame, C. Bigirimana, V. Lajustine, G. Teferra, A. Abdi, J. Taban
{"title":"第10章卡库马难民营:知识与希望所在","authors":"Staci Martin, D. Warsame, C. Bigirimana, V. Lajustine, G. Teferra, A. Abdi, J. Taban","doi":"10.1108/S2055-364120180000011012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nFar too often refugees are being researched on; however, the purpose of this chapter is to research with refugees while exploring the ways refugee youth in a higher education protracted context can become producers of research and knowledge. I sought to collaborate with my co-researchers / co-authors through a community-based action (CBA) approach at Kakuma Refugee Camp to assure that their youthful (ages 18–35) voices were included in this study. A CBA approach seeks to speak with participants, not for them. They learned about the research process, why research is needed, and how we can produce it together. Using a critical-hope framework, that is, a pedagogical tool that uses a critical theory lens to address unjust systems through meaningful dialogue and empathic responses, we co-led 30 psychosocial peace-building education (PBBE) courses in Kakuma and Nairobi, Kenya. Data were collected from the researcher and co-researchers’ reflective logs on our own observations in the PBBE courses. A thematic analysis approach was chosen in order to avoid focusing on the norms and/or creating specific norms that dictate, demand conformity, and silence divergent voices. There were three themes: time, place, and person.","PeriodicalId":408910,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Education: Integration and Acceptance of Refugees in Mainstream Society","volume":"256 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 10 Kakuma Refugee Camp: Where Knowledge and Hope Resides\",\"authors\":\"Staci Martin, D. Warsame, C. Bigirimana, V. Lajustine, G. Teferra, A. Abdi, J. Taban\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S2055-364120180000011012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nFar too often refugees are being researched on; however, the purpose of this chapter is to research with refugees while exploring the ways refugee youth in a higher education protracted context can become producers of research and knowledge. I sought to collaborate with my co-researchers / co-authors through a community-based action (CBA) approach at Kakuma Refugee Camp to assure that their youthful (ages 18–35) voices were included in this study. A CBA approach seeks to speak with participants, not for them. They learned about the research process, why research is needed, and how we can produce it together. Using a critical-hope framework, that is, a pedagogical tool that uses a critical theory lens to address unjust systems through meaningful dialogue and empathic responses, we co-led 30 psychosocial peace-building education (PBBE) courses in Kakuma and Nairobi, Kenya. Data were collected from the researcher and co-researchers’ reflective logs on our own observations in the PBBE courses. A thematic analysis approach was chosen in order to avoid focusing on the norms and/or creating specific norms that dictate, demand conformity, and silence divergent voices. There were three themes: time, place, and person.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Refugee Education: Integration and Acceptance of Refugees in Mainstream Society\",\"volume\":\"256 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Refugee Education: Integration and Acceptance of Refugees in Mainstream Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120180000011012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refugee Education: Integration and Acceptance of Refugees in Mainstream Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120180000011012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

难民经常被研究;然而,本章的目的是与难民一起研究,同时探索难民青年在高等教育长期背景下如何成为研究和知识的生产者。我试图通过卡库马难民营的社区行动(CBA)方法与我的共同研究人员/共同作者合作,以确保他们的年轻人(18-35岁)的声音被纳入本研究。CBA的方法寻求与参与者对话,而不是为他们说话。他们了解了研究过程,为什么需要研究,以及我们如何共同进行研究。我们在卡库马和肯尼亚内罗毕共同领导了30个社会心理建设和平教育(PBBE)课程,使用批判性希望框架,即使用批判性理论视角通过有意义的对话和移情反应来解决不公正制度的教学工具。数据收集自研究人员和合作研究人员对我们自己在PBBE课程中的观察的反思日志。选择主题分析方法是为了避免关注规范和/或创建特定的规范,这些规范规定,要求一致性,并沉默不同的声音。有三个主题:时间、地点和人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chapter 10 Kakuma Refugee Camp: Where Knowledge and Hope Resides
Abstract Far too often refugees are being researched on; however, the purpose of this chapter is to research with refugees while exploring the ways refugee youth in a higher education protracted context can become producers of research and knowledge. I sought to collaborate with my co-researchers / co-authors through a community-based action (CBA) approach at Kakuma Refugee Camp to assure that their youthful (ages 18–35) voices were included in this study. A CBA approach seeks to speak with participants, not for them. They learned about the research process, why research is needed, and how we can produce it together. Using a critical-hope framework, that is, a pedagogical tool that uses a critical theory lens to address unjust systems through meaningful dialogue and empathic responses, we co-led 30 psychosocial peace-building education (PBBE) courses in Kakuma and Nairobi, Kenya. Data were collected from the researcher and co-researchers’ reflective logs on our own observations in the PBBE courses. A thematic analysis approach was chosen in order to avoid focusing on the norms and/or creating specific norms that dictate, demand conformity, and silence divergent voices. There were three themes: time, place, and person.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 9 Socio-Cultural Factors that Support the Successful Transition of Refugees from Middle School to College Chapter 7 Teaching one Another: Connecting University Students to Promote Diversity Chapter 3 The Non-Formal Education Practices Tackle the Challenge of Refugee Children in Israel Chapter 11 James Madison University Sowing the Seeds of CARE (Creativity and Reading Education) within the Harrisonburg Refugee Community Prelims
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1