投资组合管理中的轨迹监测和发行人意向性评分

Théo Le Guenedal, Julien Girault, Mathieu Jouanneau, Frédéric Lepetit, Takaya Sekine
{"title":"投资组合管理中的轨迹监测和发行人意向性评分","authors":"Théo Le Guenedal, Julien Girault, Mathieu Jouanneau, Frédéric Lepetit, Takaya Sekine","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3630302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two-degrees alignment has become a major issue for climate-aware portfolio management. There are sophisticated initiatives aiming to predict corporate emission intensities from 2030 up to 2100. In this paper, we focus on the significance of the ‘current policy scenario’, where corporates would simply stay on their current trajectories for their emission intensities. UNEP has illustrated how far the global current policy scenario is from a global two-degrees scenario. We want to understand this ‘current policy scenario’, broken down asset-by-asset within the significant emission sectors, and from a global index point of view. We will address choices of emission intensity metrics and of weighting schemes. Enabling the low-carbon transition while maintaining a long-term focus in investment decision-making is a relevant approach. In this paper, we intend to illustrate the virtue of the long-term choice with a simple three-year observation gap in the power generation sector’s intensities. To complement our ‘current policy’, which focuses on the emissions track-record of firms, we illustrate a mosaic theory approach to quantifying the intentionality of a firm to green itself. Anticipating positive impacts requires that investors have identified their key questions for firms' intentions.","PeriodicalId":377322,"journal":{"name":"Investments eJournal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectory Monitoring in Portfolio Management and Issuer Intentionality Scoring\",\"authors\":\"Théo Le Guenedal, Julien Girault, Mathieu Jouanneau, Frédéric Lepetit, Takaya Sekine\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3630302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two-degrees alignment has become a major issue for climate-aware portfolio management. There are sophisticated initiatives aiming to predict corporate emission intensities from 2030 up to 2100. In this paper, we focus on the significance of the ‘current policy scenario’, where corporates would simply stay on their current trajectories for their emission intensities. UNEP has illustrated how far the global current policy scenario is from a global two-degrees scenario. We want to understand this ‘current policy scenario’, broken down asset-by-asset within the significant emission sectors, and from a global index point of view. We will address choices of emission intensity metrics and of weighting schemes. Enabling the low-carbon transition while maintaining a long-term focus in investment decision-making is a relevant approach. In this paper, we intend to illustrate the virtue of the long-term choice with a simple three-year observation gap in the power generation sector’s intensities. To complement our ‘current policy’, which focuses on the emissions track-record of firms, we illustrate a mosaic theory approach to quantifying the intentionality of a firm to green itself. Anticipating positive impacts requires that investors have identified their key questions for firms' intentions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investments eJournal\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investments eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3630302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investments eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3630302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

两度一致性已经成为气候意识投资组合管理的一个主要问题。有一些复杂的计划旨在预测从2030年到2100年的企业排放强度。在本文中,我们将重点关注“当前政策情景”的重要性,在这种情况下,企业将简单地保持其当前的排放强度轨迹。联合国环境规划署已经说明了当前全球政策情景与全球2摄氏度情景之间的差距。我们希望了解“当前的政策情景”,并从全球指数的角度对主要排放部门的资产进行细分。我们将处理排放强度指标和加权方案的选择问题。在投资决策中保持长期关注的同时,实现低碳转型是一种相关方法。在本文中,我们打算通过一个简单的发电部门强度的三年观察间隔来说明长期选择的优点。为了补充我们的“现行政策”,即关注企业的排放跟踪记录,我们说明了一种马赛克理论方法来量化企业自身的绿色意向。预期积极影响要求投资者已经确定他们对公司意图的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trajectory Monitoring in Portfolio Management and Issuer Intentionality Scoring
Two-degrees alignment has become a major issue for climate-aware portfolio management. There are sophisticated initiatives aiming to predict corporate emission intensities from 2030 up to 2100. In this paper, we focus on the significance of the ‘current policy scenario’, where corporates would simply stay on their current trajectories for their emission intensities. UNEP has illustrated how far the global current policy scenario is from a global two-degrees scenario. We want to understand this ‘current policy scenario’, broken down asset-by-asset within the significant emission sectors, and from a global index point of view. We will address choices of emission intensity metrics and of weighting schemes. Enabling the low-carbon transition while maintaining a long-term focus in investment decision-making is a relevant approach. In this paper, we intend to illustrate the virtue of the long-term choice with a simple three-year observation gap in the power generation sector’s intensities. To complement our ‘current policy’, which focuses on the emissions track-record of firms, we illustrate a mosaic theory approach to quantifying the intentionality of a firm to green itself. Anticipating positive impacts requires that investors have identified their key questions for firms' intentions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Numeraire-Invariant Quadratic Hedging and Mean-Variance Portfolio Allocation Benchmark Currency Stochastic Discount Factors Predictable Forward Performance Processes: Infrequent Evaluation and Robo-Advising Applications Shiller's CAPE and Forward Real Returns in India The Visual Shape Score: On its Predictability in the Lab, the Aggregated Stock Market, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1