医疗实践的监管目的和专业精神之间的协调的解释和法律挑战

B. Kim, Ki-young Kim
{"title":"医疗实践的监管目的和专业精神之间的协调的解释和法律挑战","authors":"B. Kim, Ki-young Kim","doi":"10.22397/bml.2022.28.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, it is reviewed the historical origins and requirements of medical practices governed by the concept of over-regulation and so-called ‘health and sanitation risks’, after examining the national regulations on medical practices derived from the concept of medical law, Based on these discussions, it is trying to make a critical examination of the trend toward expansion of the medical practice concept, unlike the medical indication and treatment purpose, which are the requirements for traditional medical practice, from the perspective of the doctor's professionalism, the concept of ‘general public health risk’ is used for the purpose of medical administration to provide practical medical care. In this regard, it presents a critical stance against precedents that recognize the medical act of tattooing. \nIn addition, with respect to the collection of unjust enrichment from medical care benefits under the National Health Insurance Act, we are looking into recent cases that a medical institution may not be denied under the National Health Insurance Act if it is recognized that the essential elements of medical practice are in place and that the doctor has provided actual medical treatment. \nIn particular. this study reviews the extent to which the doctor's discretionary power and right to treat have an impact in the area of tattooing and collection of unfair profits under the Health Insurance Act and civil liability, divided into individual areas. In the field of civil liability, it is also interpreted from this point of view as the strengthening of the duty of care guidance, which is an essential element of medical practice, or the duty of guidance and explanation suggested by precedents. And it reviewed the degree to which the discretionary power and treatment right of doctors affect. \nFinally, it is not desirable for the necessary legal control over medical care to completely expand the relationship between doctors and patients into legal norms. It is concluded that it is necessary to seek harmony with professionalism.","PeriodicalId":430360,"journal":{"name":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation and legal challenges for harmonisation between the regulatory purpose of medical practice and professionalism\",\"authors\":\"B. Kim, Ki-young Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.22397/bml.2022.28.89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, it is reviewed the historical origins and requirements of medical practices governed by the concept of over-regulation and so-called ‘health and sanitation risks’, after examining the national regulations on medical practices derived from the concept of medical law, Based on these discussions, it is trying to make a critical examination of the trend toward expansion of the medical practice concept, unlike the medical indication and treatment purpose, which are the requirements for traditional medical practice, from the perspective of the doctor's professionalism, the concept of ‘general public health risk’ is used for the purpose of medical administration to provide practical medical care. In this regard, it presents a critical stance against precedents that recognize the medical act of tattooing. \\nIn addition, with respect to the collection of unjust enrichment from medical care benefits under the National Health Insurance Act, we are looking into recent cases that a medical institution may not be denied under the National Health Insurance Act if it is recognized that the essential elements of medical practice are in place and that the doctor has provided actual medical treatment. \\nIn particular. this study reviews the extent to which the doctor's discretionary power and right to treat have an impact in the area of tattooing and collection of unfair profits under the Health Insurance Act and civil liability, divided into individual areas. In the field of civil liability, it is also interpreted from this point of view as the strengthening of the duty of care guidance, which is an essential element of medical practice, or the duty of guidance and explanation suggested by precedents. And it reviewed the degree to which the discretionary power and treatment right of doctors affect. \\nFinally, it is not desirable for the necessary legal control over medical care to completely expand the relationship between doctors and patients into legal norms. It is concluded that it is necessary to seek harmony with professionalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute\",\"volume\":\"20 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22397/bml.2022.28.89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22397/bml.2022.28.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,回顾了过度监管概念和所谓的“健康和卫生风险”概念所支配的医疗实践的历史渊源和要求,在审查了从医疗法概念衍生出来的国家医疗实践法规之后,试图在这些讨论的基础上,对医疗实践概念的扩张趋势进行批判性审查,而不是医疗指征和治疗目的。这些都是传统医疗实践的要求,从医生专业的角度来看,“一般公共卫生风险”的概念被用于医疗管理的目的,以提供实际的医疗服务。在这方面,它提出了一种批判的立场,反对承认纹身的医疗行为的先例。此外,关于根据《国家健康保险法》从医疗保健福利中收取不正当利益的问题,我们正在调查最近的一些案例,即如果认识到医疗实践的基本要素已经到位,并且医生已经提供了实际的医疗,则根据《国家健康保险法》不得拒绝医疗机构。在特定的。本研究考察了医生的自由裁量权和治疗权在《健康保险法》和民事责任规定的纹身和不公平利润征收方面的影响程度,并分为各个领域。在民事责任领域,也从这一角度解释为加强作为医疗实践要件的注意指导义务,或先例所建议的指导和解释义务。并对医生的自由裁量权和治疗权的影响程度进行了考察。最后,对医疗进行必要的法律控制,将医患关系完全扩展为法律规范是不可取的。结论是要追求专业主义的和谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interpretation and legal challenges for harmonisation between the regulatory purpose of medical practice and professionalism
In this study, it is reviewed the historical origins and requirements of medical practices governed by the concept of over-regulation and so-called ‘health and sanitation risks’, after examining the national regulations on medical practices derived from the concept of medical law, Based on these discussions, it is trying to make a critical examination of the trend toward expansion of the medical practice concept, unlike the medical indication and treatment purpose, which are the requirements for traditional medical practice, from the perspective of the doctor's professionalism, the concept of ‘general public health risk’ is used for the purpose of medical administration to provide practical medical care. In this regard, it presents a critical stance against precedents that recognize the medical act of tattooing. In addition, with respect to the collection of unjust enrichment from medical care benefits under the National Health Insurance Act, we are looking into recent cases that a medical institution may not be denied under the National Health Insurance Act if it is recognized that the essential elements of medical practice are in place and that the doctor has provided actual medical treatment. In particular. this study reviews the extent to which the doctor's discretionary power and right to treat have an impact in the area of tattooing and collection of unfair profits under the Health Insurance Act and civil liability, divided into individual areas. In the field of civil liability, it is also interpreted from this point of view as the strengthening of the duty of care guidance, which is an essential element of medical practice, or the duty of guidance and explanation suggested by precedents. And it reviewed the degree to which the discretionary power and treatment right of doctors affect. Finally, it is not desirable for the necessary legal control over medical care to completely expand the relationship between doctors and patients into legal norms. It is concluded that it is necessary to seek harmony with professionalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The explanation of medical practice according to the Article 24-2 of the Medical Act does a protect the patient's right to self-determination? A Study on the Introduction of AI Robot Tax Analysis of Supreme Court precedents related to application period under administrative statutes and legal implications: Focusing on the Supreme Court 2021.3.18. announcement 2018Du47264 en banc decision A Study on effectiveness of the Serious Accident Punishment Act A Study on the Legal Issues of the South-North Equity Joint Venture Enterprise in Kaesong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1