通心粉比意大利面好

G. Steele
{"title":"通心粉比意大利面好","authors":"G. Steele","doi":"10.1145/800228.806933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a stack implementation of multiple environments similar in principle to that of Bobrow and Wegbreit, but based on a model which provides both static and dynamic scoping. We note some of the pragmatic consequences of this choice of models; one is that no unnecessary control stack is retained for certain important constructions such as “upward funargs” and coroutines. We also discuss the correct treatment of exit functions, and the need for “entry functions” if dynamic switching of control contexts is to be consistent.","PeriodicalId":188914,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Programming Languages","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macaroni is better than spaghetti\",\"authors\":\"G. Steele\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800228.806933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a stack implementation of multiple environments similar in principle to that of Bobrow and Wegbreit, but based on a model which provides both static and dynamic scoping. We note some of the pragmatic consequences of this choice of models; one is that no unnecessary control stack is retained for certain important constructions such as “upward funargs” and coroutines. We also discuss the correct treatment of exit functions, and the need for “entry functions” if dynamic switching of control contexts is to be consistent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Programming Languages\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Programming Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800228.806933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence and Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800228.806933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

我们提出了一个多环境的堆栈实现,原理与Bobrow和Wegbreit相似,但基于一个提供静态和动态作用域的模型。我们注意到这种模型选择的一些实际后果;一个是对于某些重要的结构,如“向上的funargs”和协程,没有保留不必要的控制堆栈。我们还讨论了退出函数的正确处理,以及如果控制上下文的动态切换是一致的,那么“进入函数”的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Macaroni is better than spaghetti
We present a stack implementation of multiple environments similar in principle to that of Bobrow and Wegbreit, but based on a model which provides both static and dynamic scoping. We note some of the pragmatic consequences of this choice of models; one is that no unnecessary control stack is retained for certain important constructions such as “upward funargs” and coroutines. We also discuss the correct treatment of exit functions, and the need for “entry functions” if dynamic switching of control contexts is to be consistent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic synthesis of optimal invariant assertions: Mathematical foundations Program manipulation via an efficient production system A knowledge-based code generator generator What the nature of natural language tells us about how to make natural-language-like programming languages more natural The automatic synthesis of recursive programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1