{"title":"儿科康复中遇到的伦理问题。","authors":"D J Matthews, R H Meier, W Bartholome","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ethical issues in pediatric rehabilitation should be viewed within the framework of the understanding of the terms of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. In dealing with the pediatric patient, health professionals are most frequently treating the parents who have the decision-making authority. Normalization which underlies the concept of mainstreaming has become an important issue in pediatric rehabilitation. Normalization is based on the provision of opportunities for choosing, for independent decision making, and for autonomy. The right of the disabled child to have sexual information and to be acknowledged as a sexual individual is essential to the child's autonomy. More children are surviving catastrophic injuries and living with severe disabilities. Birth defects such as myelodysplasias point to the issues of treatment selection involving ethical, moral, philosophical, religious, financial and social values. The phrase 'quality of life' is often applied in these situations and is frequently understood as the 'best interests of the child' which should result in child-centered decisions. In this way, a decision to begin or to withhold treatment can be made in a more ethically considered manner. Resource allocation is of special concern in disabled children since they may consume significant resources in medical and rehabilitation costs spent throughout a lifetime. However, these costs may be justifiable when a disabled child matures into a productive adult. If maximum benefit of limited resources is to be achieved, these children should receive their care from rehabilitation professionals in established centers of rehabilitation expertise. However, we may soon need to accept the responsibility for rationing rehabilitative care as the number of disabled children grows beyond the dollars available to be spent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77588,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrician","volume":"17 2","pages":"108-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical issues encountered in pediatric rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"D J Matthews, R H Meier, W Bartholome\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ethical issues in pediatric rehabilitation should be viewed within the framework of the understanding of the terms of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. In dealing with the pediatric patient, health professionals are most frequently treating the parents who have the decision-making authority. Normalization which underlies the concept of mainstreaming has become an important issue in pediatric rehabilitation. Normalization is based on the provision of opportunities for choosing, for independent decision making, and for autonomy. The right of the disabled child to have sexual information and to be acknowledged as a sexual individual is essential to the child's autonomy. More children are surviving catastrophic injuries and living with severe disabilities. Birth defects such as myelodysplasias point to the issues of treatment selection involving ethical, moral, philosophical, religious, financial and social values. The phrase 'quality of life' is often applied in these situations and is frequently understood as the 'best interests of the child' which should result in child-centered decisions. In this way, a decision to begin or to withhold treatment can be made in a more ethically considered manner. Resource allocation is of special concern in disabled children since they may consume significant resources in medical and rehabilitation costs spent throughout a lifetime. However, these costs may be justifiable when a disabled child matures into a productive adult. If maximum benefit of limited resources is to be achieved, these children should receive their care from rehabilitation professionals in established centers of rehabilitation expertise. However, we may soon need to accept the responsibility for rationing rehabilitative care as the number of disabled children grows beyond the dollars available to be spent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrician\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"108-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ethical issues encountered in pediatric rehabilitation.
Ethical issues in pediatric rehabilitation should be viewed within the framework of the understanding of the terms of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. In dealing with the pediatric patient, health professionals are most frequently treating the parents who have the decision-making authority. Normalization which underlies the concept of mainstreaming has become an important issue in pediatric rehabilitation. Normalization is based on the provision of opportunities for choosing, for independent decision making, and for autonomy. The right of the disabled child to have sexual information and to be acknowledged as a sexual individual is essential to the child's autonomy. More children are surviving catastrophic injuries and living with severe disabilities. Birth defects such as myelodysplasias point to the issues of treatment selection involving ethical, moral, philosophical, religious, financial and social values. The phrase 'quality of life' is often applied in these situations and is frequently understood as the 'best interests of the child' which should result in child-centered decisions. In this way, a decision to begin or to withhold treatment can be made in a more ethically considered manner. Resource allocation is of special concern in disabled children since they may consume significant resources in medical and rehabilitation costs spent throughout a lifetime. However, these costs may be justifiable when a disabled child matures into a productive adult. If maximum benefit of limited resources is to be achieved, these children should receive their care from rehabilitation professionals in established centers of rehabilitation expertise. However, we may soon need to accept the responsibility for rationing rehabilitative care as the number of disabled children grows beyond the dollars available to be spent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)