儿科康复中遇到的伦理问题。

Pediatrician Pub Date : 1990-01-01
D J Matthews, R H Meier, W Bartholome
{"title":"儿科康复中遇到的伦理问题。","authors":"D J Matthews,&nbsp;R H Meier,&nbsp;W Bartholome","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ethical issues in pediatric rehabilitation should be viewed within the framework of the understanding of the terms of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. In dealing with the pediatric patient, health professionals are most frequently treating the parents who have the decision-making authority. Normalization which underlies the concept of mainstreaming has become an important issue in pediatric rehabilitation. Normalization is based on the provision of opportunities for choosing, for independent decision making, and for autonomy. The right of the disabled child to have sexual information and to be acknowledged as a sexual individual is essential to the child's autonomy. More children are surviving catastrophic injuries and living with severe disabilities. Birth defects such as myelodysplasias point to the issues of treatment selection involving ethical, moral, philosophical, religious, financial and social values. The phrase 'quality of life' is often applied in these situations and is frequently understood as the 'best interests of the child' which should result in child-centered decisions. In this way, a decision to begin or to withhold treatment can be made in a more ethically considered manner. Resource allocation is of special concern in disabled children since they may consume significant resources in medical and rehabilitation costs spent throughout a lifetime. However, these costs may be justifiable when a disabled child matures into a productive adult. If maximum benefit of limited resources is to be achieved, these children should receive their care from rehabilitation professionals in established centers of rehabilitation expertise. However, we may soon need to accept the responsibility for rationing rehabilitative care as the number of disabled children grows beyond the dollars available to be spent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77588,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrician","volume":"17 2","pages":"108-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical issues encountered in pediatric rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"D J Matthews,&nbsp;R H Meier,&nbsp;W Bartholome\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ethical issues in pediatric rehabilitation should be viewed within the framework of the understanding of the terms of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. In dealing with the pediatric patient, health professionals are most frequently treating the parents who have the decision-making authority. Normalization which underlies the concept of mainstreaming has become an important issue in pediatric rehabilitation. Normalization is based on the provision of opportunities for choosing, for independent decision making, and for autonomy. The right of the disabled child to have sexual information and to be acknowledged as a sexual individual is essential to the child's autonomy. More children are surviving catastrophic injuries and living with severe disabilities. Birth defects such as myelodysplasias point to the issues of treatment selection involving ethical, moral, philosophical, religious, financial and social values. The phrase 'quality of life' is often applied in these situations and is frequently understood as the 'best interests of the child' which should result in child-centered decisions. In this way, a decision to begin or to withhold treatment can be made in a more ethically considered manner. Resource allocation is of special concern in disabled children since they may consume significant resources in medical and rehabilitation costs spent throughout a lifetime. However, these costs may be justifiable when a disabled child matures into a productive adult. If maximum benefit of limited resources is to be achieved, these children should receive their care from rehabilitation professionals in established centers of rehabilitation expertise. However, we may soon need to accept the responsibility for rationing rehabilitative care as the number of disabled children grows beyond the dollars available to be spent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrician\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"108-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童康复中的伦理问题应在理解自主、无害、仁慈和正义等术语的框架内加以看待。在处理儿科病人时,卫生专业人员最常治疗的是拥有决策权的父母。规范化是主流化概念的基础,已成为儿科康复的一个重要问题。规范化的基础是提供选择、独立决策和自主的机会。残疾儿童获得性信息和被承认为性个体的权利对儿童的自主权至关重要。越来越多的儿童从灾难性的伤害中幸存下来,并患有严重的残疾。出生缺陷,如骨髓增生异常,指出了涉及伦理、道德、哲学、宗教、经济和社会价值的治疗选择问题。“生活质量”一词经常用于这些情况,并经常被理解为“儿童的最大利益”,这应该导致以儿童为中心的决定。通过这种方式,开始或停止治疗的决定可以以更合乎道德的方式做出。残疾儿童的资源分配特别令人关切,因为他们一生中可能消耗大量的医疗和康复费用资源。然而,当残疾儿童成长为有生产力的成年人时,这些费用可能是合理的。如果要使有限的资源获得最大的效益,这些儿童应该在已建立的康复专门知识中心接受康复专业人员的照顾。然而,我们可能很快就需要承担起配给康复护理的责任,因为残疾儿童的数量越来越多,超出了可用的资金。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical issues encountered in pediatric rehabilitation.

Ethical issues in pediatric rehabilitation should be viewed within the framework of the understanding of the terms of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. In dealing with the pediatric patient, health professionals are most frequently treating the parents who have the decision-making authority. Normalization which underlies the concept of mainstreaming has become an important issue in pediatric rehabilitation. Normalization is based on the provision of opportunities for choosing, for independent decision making, and for autonomy. The right of the disabled child to have sexual information and to be acknowledged as a sexual individual is essential to the child's autonomy. More children are surviving catastrophic injuries and living with severe disabilities. Birth defects such as myelodysplasias point to the issues of treatment selection involving ethical, moral, philosophical, religious, financial and social values. The phrase 'quality of life' is often applied in these situations and is frequently understood as the 'best interests of the child' which should result in child-centered decisions. In this way, a decision to begin or to withhold treatment can be made in a more ethically considered manner. Resource allocation is of special concern in disabled children since they may consume significant resources in medical and rehabilitation costs spent throughout a lifetime. However, these costs may be justifiable when a disabled child matures into a productive adult. If maximum benefit of limited resources is to be achieved, these children should receive their care from rehabilitation professionals in established centers of rehabilitation expertise. However, we may soon need to accept the responsibility for rationing rehabilitative care as the number of disabled children grows beyond the dollars available to be spent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coronaviral infection Management of asthma in early life. Neuropsychologic (cognitive) disabilities in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Epidemiology of asthma in childhood. Pathogenesis of asthma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1