{"title":"Krimināllikumam 20 – Krimināllikuma 190. panta “Kontrabanda” ģenēze un evolūcija","authors":"Toms Čevers, Latvijas Universitāte","doi":"10.22364/iscflul.7.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article follows the amendments made in part one of the Section 190 “Smuggling” of the Criminal Law of the Republic of Latvia, providing the analysis of the effect brought by the changes in the disposition of part one of the Section 190 on the comprehension of the constituent elements of smuggling, as well as an evaluation of conformity between the changes made in the sanctions of part one of the Section 190 and legislator’s attitude towards harmfulness of smuggling. It is concluded that in amending the legal definition of the smuggling and criminalization threshold, the legislator has not respected the principle of legal certainty. atslēgvārdi: kontrabanda, kriminālatbildības slieksnis, noziedzīga nodarījuma priekš mets, tiesiskās noteiktības princips","PeriodicalId":212350,"journal":{"name":"Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I","volume":"725 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.7.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这条是在拉脱维亚共和国刑法第190节“走私”第1部分的修正之后,分析第190节第1部分的处理变化对理解走私的构成要素所带来的影响,并评价第190节第1部分制裁的变化与立法者对走私危害性的态度之间的一致性。结论是,在修改走私和定罪门槛的法律定义时,立法者没有尊重法律确定性原则。Atslēgvārdi: kontrabanda, kriminālatbildības slieksnis, noziedzuz ga nodaruz - juma priekš - mets, tiesiskās noteiktk - as原则
Krimināllikumam 20 – Krimināllikuma 190. panta “Kontrabanda” ģenēze un evolūcija
The article follows the amendments made in part one of the Section 190 “Smuggling” of the Criminal Law of the Republic of Latvia, providing the analysis of the effect brought by the changes in the disposition of part one of the Section 190 on the comprehension of the constituent elements of smuggling, as well as an evaluation of conformity between the changes made in the sanctions of part one of the Section 190 and legislator’s attitude towards harmfulness of smuggling. It is concluded that in amending the legal definition of the smuggling and criminalization threshold, the legislator has not respected the principle of legal certainty. atslēgvārdi: kontrabanda, kriminālatbildības slieksnis, noziedzīga nodarījuma priekš mets, tiesiskās noteiktības princips