{"title":"Munkres算法的并发实现","authors":"T. D. Gottschalk","doi":"10.1109/DMCC.1990.555361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"is minimized over all permutations II. For NA 5 N B , the naive (exhaustive search) complexity of the assignment problem is O[NB! / (NB N A ) ! ] . There are, however, a variety of exact solutions to the assignment problem with reduced complexity O[N;NB], (Refs.[l-31). Section 2 briefly describes one such method, Munkres Algorithm [2] , and presents a particular sequential implementation. Performance of the algorithm is examined for the particularly nasty problem of associating lists of random points within the unit square. In Section 3, the algorithm is generalized for concurrent execution, and performance results for runs on the Mark111 hypercube are presented. The input to the assignment problem is the matrix D Z E { d i j } of dissimilarities from Eq.(3). The first point to note is that the particular assignment which minimizes Eq.(6) is not altered if afixed value is added to or subtracted from all entries in any row or column of the cost matrix D. Exploiting this fact, Munkres solution to the Assignment Problem can be divided into two parts","PeriodicalId":204431,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth Distributed Memory Computing Conference, 1990.","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent Implementation of Munkres Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"T. D. Gottschalk\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DMCC.1990.555361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"is minimized over all permutations II. For NA 5 N B , the naive (exhaustive search) complexity of the assignment problem is O[NB! / (NB N A ) ! ] . There are, however, a variety of exact solutions to the assignment problem with reduced complexity O[N;NB], (Refs.[l-31). Section 2 briefly describes one such method, Munkres Algorithm [2] , and presents a particular sequential implementation. Performance of the algorithm is examined for the particularly nasty problem of associating lists of random points within the unit square. In Section 3, the algorithm is generalized for concurrent execution, and performance results for runs on the Mark111 hypercube are presented. The input to the assignment problem is the matrix D Z E { d i j } of dissimilarities from Eq.(3). The first point to note is that the particular assignment which minimizes Eq.(6) is not altered if afixed value is added to or subtracted from all entries in any row or column of the cost matrix D. Exploiting this fact, Munkres solution to the Assignment Problem can be divided into two parts\",\"PeriodicalId\":204431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Distributed Memory Computing Conference, 1990.\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Distributed Memory Computing Conference, 1990.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DMCC.1990.555361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth Distributed Memory Computing Conference, 1990.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DMCC.1990.555361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
在所有排列中最小。对于n5nb,赋值问题的朴素(穷举搜索)复杂度为0 [NB!/ (nb n a) !] . 然而,有多种精确解的分配问题,降低了复杂度O[N;NB],(参考文献[l-31])。第2节简要介绍了一种这样的方法,Munkres算法[2],并给出了一个特定的顺序实现。对该算法的性能进行了检验,以解决单位平方内随机点的关联列表这一特别棘手的问题。在第3节中,将该算法推广到并发执行,并给出了在Mark111超立方体上运行的性能结果。分配问题的输入是与Eq.(3)不相似的矩阵D Z E {D i j}。首先要注意的是,如果在成本矩阵d的任何行或列的所有条目中添加或减去固定值,则最小化Eq.(6)的特定分配不会改变。利用这一事实,Munkres对分配问题的解决方案可以分为两个部分
is minimized over all permutations II. For NA 5 N B , the naive (exhaustive search) complexity of the assignment problem is O[NB! / (NB N A ) ! ] . There are, however, a variety of exact solutions to the assignment problem with reduced complexity O[N;NB], (Refs.[l-31). Section 2 briefly describes one such method, Munkres Algorithm [2] , and presents a particular sequential implementation. Performance of the algorithm is examined for the particularly nasty problem of associating lists of random points within the unit square. In Section 3, the algorithm is generalized for concurrent execution, and performance results for runs on the Mark111 hypercube are presented. The input to the assignment problem is the matrix D Z E { d i j } of dissimilarities from Eq.(3). The first point to note is that the particular assignment which minimizes Eq.(6) is not altered if afixed value is added to or subtracted from all entries in any row or column of the cost matrix D. Exploiting this fact, Munkres solution to the Assignment Problem can be divided into two parts