两种抗儿童包装(crp)在老年人可用性测试中的比较

Gabriel Henrique Cruz Bonfim, Luiz Carlos Paschoarelli
{"title":"两种抗儿童包装(crp)在老年人可用性测试中的比较","authors":"Gabriel Henrique Cruz Bonfim, Luiz Carlos Paschoarelli","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to conduct a usability test with elderly users, using two Child Resistant Packages (CRPs): one of them is the \"Squeeze-and-turn\" type and the other is the \"Push-down-and-turn\" type, in order to identify differences between genders and propose improvements in the design of the caps. The proposed task was to open and close the two packages. The results show that subjects had difficulties with both packages, however the push-down-and-turn package seems to be easier to open, but the satisfaction of use was higher for the squeeze-and-turn package.","PeriodicalId":259265,"journal":{"name":"AHFE International","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Two Child-Resistant Packages (CRPs) Through a Usability Test With Elderly People\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Henrique Cruz Bonfim, Luiz Carlos Paschoarelli\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1001335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study aimed to conduct a usability test with elderly users, using two Child Resistant Packages (CRPs): one of them is the \\\"Squeeze-and-turn\\\" type and the other is the \\\"Push-down-and-turn\\\" type, in order to identify differences between genders and propose improvements in the design of the caps. The proposed task was to open and close the two packages. The results show that subjects had difficulties with both packages, however the push-down-and-turn package seems to be easier to open, but the satisfaction of use was higher for the squeeze-and-turn package.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AHFE International\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AHFE International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHFE International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在对老年用户进行可用性测试,使用两种儿童抵抗包装(crp):一种是“挤压和翻转”型,另一种是“下推和翻转”型,以确定性别差异,并提出改进的设计。提议的任务是打开和关闭两个包裹。结果表明,被试对两种包装都有困难,但下推旋转包装似乎更容易打开,而挤压旋转包装的使用满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison Between Two Child-Resistant Packages (CRPs) Through a Usability Test With Elderly People
The present study aimed to conduct a usability test with elderly users, using two Child Resistant Packages (CRPs): one of them is the "Squeeze-and-turn" type and the other is the "Push-down-and-turn" type, in order to identify differences between genders and propose improvements in the design of the caps. The proposed task was to open and close the two packages. The results show that subjects had difficulties with both packages, however the push-down-and-turn package seems to be easier to open, but the satisfaction of use was higher for the squeeze-and-turn package.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revitalizing The National Folk Play: The Tiger Hunting Folk Play Promoting Occupational Safety, Health, and Well-Being in SME Manufacturing Companies A Multi-Criteria and Multi-Actor Perspective for the Evaluation of Sustainability Services Open Innovation and Prospective Ergonomics for Smart Clothes Time Study and Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1