评估在非洲适用保护责任的合法性:利比亚的经验

Emmanuel Odoemena, Elias Offor, I. Ukam
{"title":"评估在非洲适用保护责任的合法性:利比亚的经验","authors":"Emmanuel Odoemena, Elias Offor, I. Ukam","doi":"10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international community gathered in 2005 and adopted responsibility to protect in paragraph 138 and 139 of the World Summit Outcome Document. Few years after this adoption, the international community through the UN Security Council applied the concept of responsibility to protect in the 2011 Libyan intervention. The Resolution 1973 was adopted as a result of Gaddafi’s manifest intention to exterminate the Libyan population. It authorised the member nations and regional organizations to use all necessary measures to protect civilians in Libya. Thereafter, the coalition of states went to Libya under the pretext of responsibility to protect and protection of civilians, and as a result the Libyan leader was killed. The killing of Gaddafi generated wide controversy as a result of the manner in which the intervening forces implemented Resolution 1973. It was against this background that this research work set to evaluate the application of responsibility to protect in Africa using the Libyan intervention as a text case. In so doing, the study examines the historical development and content of responsibility to protect, which was introduced in 2001 as a result of the Security Council’s failure to authorize intervention for humanitarian purposes in Rwanda, Bosnia and Kosovo. The study aims to investigate whether or not the intervention in Libya was in line with responsibility to protect, and in so doing, the study analyses Resolution 1973 to ascertain whether or not the interveners went beyond mandate.  The responsibility to protect is central to the discussion of this research work because Resolution 1973 in its preamble reminded the Libyan authorities of their responsibility to protect civilian populations. The study in analysing Resolution 1973, argues that it would be impossible to enforce civilian protection with Gaddafi in power, and even if some scholars posited that the interveners went beyond mandate in Resolution 1973, the interveners saved many lives which would have been killed by Gaddafi.","PeriodicalId":326636,"journal":{"name":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Legality of Application of Responsibility to Protect in Africa: The Libya Experience\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Odoemena, Elias Offor, I. Ukam\",\"doi\":\"10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The international community gathered in 2005 and adopted responsibility to protect in paragraph 138 and 139 of the World Summit Outcome Document. Few years after this adoption, the international community through the UN Security Council applied the concept of responsibility to protect in the 2011 Libyan intervention. The Resolution 1973 was adopted as a result of Gaddafi’s manifest intention to exterminate the Libyan population. It authorised the member nations and regional organizations to use all necessary measures to protect civilians in Libya. Thereafter, the coalition of states went to Libya under the pretext of responsibility to protect and protection of civilians, and as a result the Libyan leader was killed. The killing of Gaddafi generated wide controversy as a result of the manner in which the intervening forces implemented Resolution 1973. It was against this background that this research work set to evaluate the application of responsibility to protect in Africa using the Libyan intervention as a text case. In so doing, the study examines the historical development and content of responsibility to protect, which was introduced in 2001 as a result of the Security Council’s failure to authorize intervention for humanitarian purposes in Rwanda, Bosnia and Kosovo. The study aims to investigate whether or not the intervention in Libya was in line with responsibility to protect, and in so doing, the study analyses Resolution 1973 to ascertain whether or not the interveners went beyond mandate.  The responsibility to protect is central to the discussion of this research work because Resolution 1973 in its preamble reminded the Libyan authorities of their responsibility to protect civilian populations. The study in analysing Resolution 1973, argues that it would be impossible to enforce civilian protection with Gaddafi in power, and even if some scholars posited that the interveners went beyond mandate in Resolution 1973, the interveners saved many lives which would have been killed by Gaddafi.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Nigerian Juridical Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Nigerian Juridical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际社会于2005年举行会议,在世界首脑会议成果文件第138和139段中通过了保护的责任。在这项决议通过几年后,国际社会通过联合国安理会在2011年对利比亚的干预行动中应用了保护责任的概念。1973号决议是由于卡扎菲明显意图消灭利比亚人口而通过的。决议授权成员国和区域组织采取一切必要措施保护利比亚平民。此后,多国联军以保护和保护平民的责任为借口前往利比亚,结果利比亚领导人被杀。由于干预部队执行1973号决议的方式,卡扎菲之死引起了广泛的争议。正是在这种背景下,本研究工作以利比亚干预为文本案例,开始评估保护责任在非洲的应用。在此过程中,该研究考察了保护责任的历史发展和内容。2001年,由于安全理事会未能授权为人道主义目的对卢旺达、波斯尼亚和科索沃进行干预,该责任被引入。本研究的目的是调查对利比亚的干预是否符合保护责任,在此过程中,本研究分析了1973号决议,以确定干预者是否超出了授权范围。保护的责任是讨论这项研究工作的核心,因为第1973号决议在其序言中提醒利比亚当局他们有责任保护平民。分析1973号决议的研究认为,在卡扎菲掌权的情况下,实施平民保护是不可能的,即使一些学者认为干预者超越了1973号决议的授权,干预者也挽救了许多本来会被卡扎菲杀害的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Legality of Application of Responsibility to Protect in Africa: The Libya Experience
The international community gathered in 2005 and adopted responsibility to protect in paragraph 138 and 139 of the World Summit Outcome Document. Few years after this adoption, the international community through the UN Security Council applied the concept of responsibility to protect in the 2011 Libyan intervention. The Resolution 1973 was adopted as a result of Gaddafi’s manifest intention to exterminate the Libyan population. It authorised the member nations and regional organizations to use all necessary measures to protect civilians in Libya. Thereafter, the coalition of states went to Libya under the pretext of responsibility to protect and protection of civilians, and as a result the Libyan leader was killed. The killing of Gaddafi generated wide controversy as a result of the manner in which the intervening forces implemented Resolution 1973. It was against this background that this research work set to evaluate the application of responsibility to protect in Africa using the Libyan intervention as a text case. In so doing, the study examines the historical development and content of responsibility to protect, which was introduced in 2001 as a result of the Security Council’s failure to authorize intervention for humanitarian purposes in Rwanda, Bosnia and Kosovo. The study aims to investigate whether or not the intervention in Libya was in line with responsibility to protect, and in so doing, the study analyses Resolution 1973 to ascertain whether or not the interveners went beyond mandate.  The responsibility to protect is central to the discussion of this research work because Resolution 1973 in its preamble reminded the Libyan authorities of their responsibility to protect civilian populations. The study in analysing Resolution 1973, argues that it would be impossible to enforce civilian protection with Gaddafi in power, and even if some scholars posited that the interveners went beyond mandate in Resolution 1973, the interveners saved many lives which would have been killed by Gaddafi.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Climate Change Regime in Maintaining Internal Security in Nigeria Dysfunctional Nigerian Insurance Industry: Failure of Law or Regulation? Protection of Traditional Knowledge and its Relevance to National Economic Growth and Development in Nigeria Primary Health Care Approach to Achieving Universal Health Coverage in Nigeria: Are Extant Legal and Policy Regimes Adequate? Impact of the Public Procurement Act 2007 on the Functions of Governing Councils of Federal Universities in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1