使用深度学习和非深度学习技术检测和比较英语和印度英语中使用表情符号的辱骂和仇恨言论

Sneha Bhaskara, S. P, Srishti Seth, S. Mohanty, P. Kanwal
{"title":"使用深度学习和非深度学习技术检测和比较英语和印度英语中使用表情符号的辱骂和仇恨言论","authors":"Sneha Bhaskara, S. P, Srishti Seth, S. Mohanty, P. Kanwal","doi":"10.1109/INCET57972.2023.10170633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abusive language and hate speech in tweets and comments on various social media platforms have become ubiquitous. This paper focuses on classifying an input text in English, Hindi and Hinglish (Hindi written in English) along with emojis and emoticons into three categories - Abusive, Hate Speech or Neither based on the confidence scores of each class. Abusive language on social media is textual content that contains disparaging words. Hate speech can be threatening and can hurt the sentiments of a person or a community. To gain better insights, results are captured with and without lemmatization and stemming. Accuracy is used as the metric to evaluate the classification models. Deep learning models BERT and RoBERTa are trained separately on plain English data (PE), Hinglish data along with emojis (HEmo) and the combined full dataset (CF). The same process is repeated for five non-deep learning models - Decision trees, k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest and Naïve Bayes. The deep learning model RoBERTa results in the highest accuracy of 0.9938 on the PE dataset, 0.9896 on the EHEmo dataset and 0.9899 on the CF dataset. SVM model performed best among traditional classifiers with an accuracy of 0.7996 on the PE dataset, 0.7899 on the EHEmo dataset and 0.7913 on the CF dataset.","PeriodicalId":403008,"journal":{"name":"2023 4th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET)","volume":"188 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection and Comparison of Abusive and Hate Speech in English and Hinglish with Emojis using Deep Learning and Non-Deep Learning Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Sneha Bhaskara, S. P, Srishti Seth, S. Mohanty, P. Kanwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INCET57972.2023.10170633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abusive language and hate speech in tweets and comments on various social media platforms have become ubiquitous. This paper focuses on classifying an input text in English, Hindi and Hinglish (Hindi written in English) along with emojis and emoticons into three categories - Abusive, Hate Speech or Neither based on the confidence scores of each class. Abusive language on social media is textual content that contains disparaging words. Hate speech can be threatening and can hurt the sentiments of a person or a community. To gain better insights, results are captured with and without lemmatization and stemming. Accuracy is used as the metric to evaluate the classification models. Deep learning models BERT and RoBERTa are trained separately on plain English data (PE), Hinglish data along with emojis (HEmo) and the combined full dataset (CF). The same process is repeated for five non-deep learning models - Decision trees, k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest and Naïve Bayes. The deep learning model RoBERTa results in the highest accuracy of 0.9938 on the PE dataset, 0.9896 on the EHEmo dataset and 0.9899 on the CF dataset. SVM model performed best among traditional classifiers with an accuracy of 0.7996 on the PE dataset, 0.7899 on the EHEmo dataset and 0.7913 on the CF dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 4th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET)\",\"volume\":\"188 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 4th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCET57972.2023.10170633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 4th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCET57972.2023.10170633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在各种社交媒体平台的推特和评论中,辱骂性语言和仇恨言论已经无处不在。本文的重点是将英语,印地语和印度英语(用英语写的印地语)的输入文本以及表情符号和表情符号分为三类-基于每个类别的置信度得分,辱骂,仇恨言论或两者都不是。社交媒体上的辱骂性语言是包含贬损性词语的文本内容。仇恨言论可能具有威胁性,可能会伤害一个人或一个社区的情绪。为了获得更好的洞察力,可以在有无词干化和词干化的情况下捕获结果。准确度被用作评价分类模型的度量。深度学习模型BERT和RoBERTa分别在普通英语数据(PE)、印度英语数据以及表情符号(HEmo)和组合完整数据集(CF)上进行训练。对于五种非深度学习模型——决策树、k近邻(kNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林和Naïve贝叶斯,重复同样的过程。深度学习模型RoBERTa在PE数据集上的准确率最高,为0.9938,在EHEmo数据集上为0.9896,在CF数据集上为0.9899。SVM模型在传统分类器中表现最好,PE数据集的准确率为0.7996,EHEmo数据集的准确率为0.7899,CF数据集的准确率为0.7913。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection and Comparison of Abusive and Hate Speech in English and Hinglish with Emojis using Deep Learning and Non-Deep Learning Techniques
Abusive language and hate speech in tweets and comments on various social media platforms have become ubiquitous. This paper focuses on classifying an input text in English, Hindi and Hinglish (Hindi written in English) along with emojis and emoticons into three categories - Abusive, Hate Speech or Neither based on the confidence scores of each class. Abusive language on social media is textual content that contains disparaging words. Hate speech can be threatening and can hurt the sentiments of a person or a community. To gain better insights, results are captured with and without lemmatization and stemming. Accuracy is used as the metric to evaluate the classification models. Deep learning models BERT and RoBERTa are trained separately on plain English data (PE), Hinglish data along with emojis (HEmo) and the combined full dataset (CF). The same process is repeated for five non-deep learning models - Decision trees, k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest and Naïve Bayes. The deep learning model RoBERTa results in the highest accuracy of 0.9938 on the PE dataset, 0.9896 on the EHEmo dataset and 0.9899 on the CF dataset. SVM model performed best among traditional classifiers with an accuracy of 0.7996 on the PE dataset, 0.7899 on the EHEmo dataset and 0.7913 on the CF dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep Learning-Based Solution for Differently-Abled Persons in The Society CARP-YOLO: A Detection Framework for Recognising and Counting Fish Species in a Cluttered Environment Implementation of Covid patient Health Monitoring System using IoT ESP Tuning to Reduce Auxiliary Power Consumption and Preserve Environment Real-time Recognition of Indian Sign Language using OpenCV and Deep Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1