社会正义时代的多元化委员会

Gilbert Singletary, Kenneth Royal, Kathy Goodridge-Purnell
{"title":"社会正义时代的多元化委员会","authors":"Gilbert Singletary, Kenneth Royal, Kathy Goodridge-Purnell","doi":"10.33137/ijidi.v5i5.37145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The deaths of George Floyd and other African American men and women in 2020 awakened the consciousness of Americans and social justice advocates across the world. The chants of “Black Lives Matter!” echoed from the streets of Minneapolis – all the way to the shores of Cape Town, South Africa. Immense pressure from protestors and community organizers caused those in education and traditional business sectors to evaluate their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Many organizations responded by releasing statements in support of minoritized groups, often including the hashtags #BLM or #NAACP[i]. However, despite support offered via social media, consumers and social justice advocates demanded more than just words. To that end, many institutions began to establish diversity book clubs, while others created DEI committees, and/or appointed a Chief Diversity Officer to guide DEI initiatives across the institution (Byrd et al., 2021).\nConstructing and operating a diverse DEI committee presents significant challenges. In addition to the barriers associated with assembling diverse members, there are also methodological constraints as there is a dearth of empirical research within the extant literature that provides guidance in constructing and evaluating the effectiveness of DEI committees. To that end, the purpose of this article is three-fold: (1) to discuss the necessity of DEI committees in higher education and corporate settings; (2) to explain why DEI committees sometimes fail; and (3) to offer some suggestions for addressing ways to improve their overall effectiveness.\n[i] These are the Twitter designations for Black Lives Matter and The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, respectively.","PeriodicalId":232185,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity Committees During The Era of Social Justice\",\"authors\":\"Gilbert Singletary, Kenneth Royal, Kathy Goodridge-Purnell\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/ijidi.v5i5.37145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The deaths of George Floyd and other African American men and women in 2020 awakened the consciousness of Americans and social justice advocates across the world. The chants of “Black Lives Matter!” echoed from the streets of Minneapolis – all the way to the shores of Cape Town, South Africa. Immense pressure from protestors and community organizers caused those in education and traditional business sectors to evaluate their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Many organizations responded by releasing statements in support of minoritized groups, often including the hashtags #BLM or #NAACP[i]. However, despite support offered via social media, consumers and social justice advocates demanded more than just words. To that end, many institutions began to establish diversity book clubs, while others created DEI committees, and/or appointed a Chief Diversity Officer to guide DEI initiatives across the institution (Byrd et al., 2021).\\nConstructing and operating a diverse DEI committee presents significant challenges. In addition to the barriers associated with assembling diverse members, there are also methodological constraints as there is a dearth of empirical research within the extant literature that provides guidance in constructing and evaluating the effectiveness of DEI committees. To that end, the purpose of this article is three-fold: (1) to discuss the necessity of DEI committees in higher education and corporate settings; (2) to explain why DEI committees sometimes fail; and (3) to offer some suggestions for addressing ways to improve their overall effectiveness.\\n[i] These are the Twitter designations for Black Lives Matter and The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v5i5.37145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v5i5.37145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年,乔治·弗洛伊德和其他非裔美国人的死亡唤醒了美国人和世界各地的社会正义倡导者的意识。“黑人的命也是命!”这一声音从明尼阿波利斯的街道一直传到南非开普敦的海岸。来自抗议者和社区组织者的巨大压力迫使教育和传统商业部门评估他们对多样性、公平和包容(DEI)的承诺。许多组织的回应是发表声明支持少数群体,通常包括#BLM或#NAACP[i]的标签。然而,尽管通过社交媒体提供了支持,消费者和社会正义倡导者要求的不仅仅是言语。为此,许多机构开始建立多元化读书俱乐部,而其他机构则成立了DEI委员会,和/或任命了首席多元化官来指导整个机构的DEI计划(Byrd等人,2021)。构建和运营一个多元化的DEI委员会提出了重大挑战。除了与召集不同成员相关的障碍之外,还存在方法上的限制,因为现有文献中缺乏为构建和评估DEI委员会的有效性提供指导的实证研究。为此,本文的目的有三个方面:(1)讨论在高等教育和企业环境中设立DEI委员会的必要性;(2)解释为什么DEI委员会有时会失败;(3)就如何提高高校的整体效能提出建议。这些分别是“黑人的命也是命”和“全国有色人种协进会”在Twitter上的名称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diversity Committees During The Era of Social Justice
The deaths of George Floyd and other African American men and women in 2020 awakened the consciousness of Americans and social justice advocates across the world. The chants of “Black Lives Matter!” echoed from the streets of Minneapolis – all the way to the shores of Cape Town, South Africa. Immense pressure from protestors and community organizers caused those in education and traditional business sectors to evaluate their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Many organizations responded by releasing statements in support of minoritized groups, often including the hashtags #BLM or #NAACP[i]. However, despite support offered via social media, consumers and social justice advocates demanded more than just words. To that end, many institutions began to establish diversity book clubs, while others created DEI committees, and/or appointed a Chief Diversity Officer to guide DEI initiatives across the institution (Byrd et al., 2021). Constructing and operating a diverse DEI committee presents significant challenges. In addition to the barriers associated with assembling diverse members, there are also methodological constraints as there is a dearth of empirical research within the extant literature that provides guidance in constructing and evaluating the effectiveness of DEI committees. To that end, the purpose of this article is three-fold: (1) to discuss the necessity of DEI committees in higher education and corporate settings; (2) to explain why DEI committees sometimes fail; and (3) to offer some suggestions for addressing ways to improve their overall effectiveness. [i] These are the Twitter designations for Black Lives Matter and The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Monitoring in the Library “She Started Wearing Men’s Clothing and Acting More Masculine" History and Memory of Dissident Sexualities from Latin America Bridging LGBT+ Content Gaps Across Wikipedia Language Editions Silence May Equal Death, But So Does Uncompensated Queer Labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1