基于U-net和U-net++语义分割网络的砂岩薄层岩性定量识别

Baosen Zhang, Xin Jin, Yitian Xiao, Yunzhe Hou, Jin Meng, Zhenkai Huang, Meng Han
{"title":"基于U-net和U-net++语义分割网络的砂岩薄层岩性定量识别","authors":"Baosen Zhang, Xin Jin, Yitian Xiao, Yunzhe Hou, Jin Meng, Zhenkai Huang, Meng Han","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22865-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Quantitative identification of sandstone microscopic images is an essential task for sandstone reservoir characterization. The widely-used classical Gazzi-Dickinson point-counting method can be subjective, inconsistent and time-consuming. Furthermore, by directly putting labeled microscopic images of all rock types into image recognition models for training, most previous studies did not address the petrographic principle of artificial identification. In this study, U-Net and U-Net++ semantic segmentation networks that incorporated the sandstone petrographic principle in quantitative identification of sandstone was introduced.\n Automatic identification of sandstone microscopic images requires prior knowledge learned from the identified sandstones with similar compositions. First, hundreds of thin-sections of typical sandstone reservoirs were selected from several key petroleum basins in China. Second, one-to-one single and orthogonal polarized images were taken for them. Third, the annotation software was used to label the type of each skeleton grain, including quartz, feldspar, lithic fragment and pore. Finally, 480 sets of data, each of which includes single and orthogonal polarized images and their \".json\" format annotation results, were obtained for training and testing of the U-Net model to quantitatively analyze sandstone microscopic images.\n Within the 480 sets of data, 6798 sandstone skeleton grains, including 4542 quartzes, 796 feldspars, 1248 lithic fragments and 212 pores were labeled. The sandstone thin-section quantitative identification model trained by 392 data sets achieved a training accuracy of 96% with the intersection over union at 78% for quartz, and a training accuracy of 88% with the intersection over union at 56% for lithic fragments. The remaining 88 data sets were used for testing, and the accuracy was 87% with its intersection over union at 74% for quartz and a training accuracy of 77% with the intersection over union at 54% for lithic fragments. As a classic fully convolutional network that excels in processing medical images, the U-Net or U-Net++ semantic segmentation network has also performed very well in quantitative identification of sandstone microscopic images. After the proportion of each sandstone skeleton grain has been identified, the simple subdivision descriptive petrographic classification of the sandstone was determined according to the classic Dickinson sandstone taxonomic criteria. In other words, most current deep learning algorithms classify sandstones at the bulk rock level, but this U-Net model has been extended to the mineral level for comprehensive identification. Our vision-based sandstone lithology identification model has not only improved the accuracy of artificial identification but also reduced the instability and subjectivity of the traditional manual processing and expert decision-making approach.\n In the future, we plan to increase the number and coverage of labeled thin-section images to evaluate the impact on the accuracy and consistency of the U-Net or U-Net++ model, and to expand the approach to identify other terrigenous clastic rock. Furthermore, we hope to improve the capability of the model to identify grains, such as monocrystalline and polycrystalline quartz from \"quartz\", K-feldspar and plagioclase from \"feldspar\", and igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary lithic fragments from \"lithic fragments\".","PeriodicalId":283978,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Identification of Sandstone Lithology Based On Thin-Section Micrographs Using the U-net and U-net++ Semantic Segmentation Network\",\"authors\":\"Baosen Zhang, Xin Jin, Yitian Xiao, Yunzhe Hou, Jin Meng, Zhenkai Huang, Meng Han\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-22865-ea\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Quantitative identification of sandstone microscopic images is an essential task for sandstone reservoir characterization. The widely-used classical Gazzi-Dickinson point-counting method can be subjective, inconsistent and time-consuming. Furthermore, by directly putting labeled microscopic images of all rock types into image recognition models for training, most previous studies did not address the petrographic principle of artificial identification. In this study, U-Net and U-Net++ semantic segmentation networks that incorporated the sandstone petrographic principle in quantitative identification of sandstone was introduced.\\n Automatic identification of sandstone microscopic images requires prior knowledge learned from the identified sandstones with similar compositions. First, hundreds of thin-sections of typical sandstone reservoirs were selected from several key petroleum basins in China. Second, one-to-one single and orthogonal polarized images were taken for them. Third, the annotation software was used to label the type of each skeleton grain, including quartz, feldspar, lithic fragment and pore. Finally, 480 sets of data, each of which includes single and orthogonal polarized images and their \\\".json\\\" format annotation results, were obtained for training and testing of the U-Net model to quantitatively analyze sandstone microscopic images.\\n Within the 480 sets of data, 6798 sandstone skeleton grains, including 4542 quartzes, 796 feldspars, 1248 lithic fragments and 212 pores were labeled. The sandstone thin-section quantitative identification model trained by 392 data sets achieved a training accuracy of 96% with the intersection over union at 78% for quartz, and a training accuracy of 88% with the intersection over union at 56% for lithic fragments. The remaining 88 data sets were used for testing, and the accuracy was 87% with its intersection over union at 74% for quartz and a training accuracy of 77% with the intersection over union at 54% for lithic fragments. As a classic fully convolutional network that excels in processing medical images, the U-Net or U-Net++ semantic segmentation network has also performed very well in quantitative identification of sandstone microscopic images. After the proportion of each sandstone skeleton grain has been identified, the simple subdivision descriptive petrographic classification of the sandstone was determined according to the classic Dickinson sandstone taxonomic criteria. In other words, most current deep learning algorithms classify sandstones at the bulk rock level, but this U-Net model has been extended to the mineral level for comprehensive identification. Our vision-based sandstone lithology identification model has not only improved the accuracy of artificial identification but also reduced the instability and subjectivity of the traditional manual processing and expert decision-making approach.\\n In the future, we plan to increase the number and coverage of labeled thin-section images to evaluate the impact on the accuracy and consistency of the U-Net or U-Net++ model, and to expand the approach to identify other terrigenous clastic rock. Furthermore, we hope to improve the capability of the model to identify grains, such as monocrystalline and polycrystalline quartz from \\\"quartz\\\", K-feldspar and plagioclase from \\\"feldspar\\\", and igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary lithic fragments from \\\"lithic fragments\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":283978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22865-ea\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22865-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

砂岩显微图像的定量识别是砂岩储层表征的一项重要工作。广泛使用的经典加齐-狄金森点计数法具有主观性、不一致性和耗时等缺点。此外,通过直接将所有岩石类型的标记显微图像放入图像识别模型中进行训练,大多数先前的研究没有解决人工识别的岩石学原理。本文介绍了结合砂岩岩相学原理的U-Net和U-Net++语义分割网络在砂岩定量识别中的应用。砂岩显微图像的自动识别需要从具有相似成分的已识别砂岩中学习先验知识。首先,从中国几个重点含油气盆地选取了数百个典型砂岩储层薄片;其次,对其进行一对一单偏振和正交偏振成像;第三,利用标注软件对各骨架颗粒类型进行标注,包括石英、长石、岩屑和孔隙。最后得到480组数据,每组数据包括单幅和正交偏振图像及其“。获取U-Net模型的训练和测试结果,用于定量分析砂岩微观图像。在480组数据中,标记了6798个砂岩骨架颗粒,其中石英4542个,长石796个,岩屑1248个,孔隙212个。由392个数据集训练的砂岩薄切片定量识别模型,石英的训练精度为96%,交集优于联合的训练精度为78%;岩屑的训练精度为88%,交集优于联合的训练精度为56%。剩下的88个数据集用于测试,石英的准确率为87%,交集超过联合的准确率为74%,岩屑的训练准确率为77%,交集超过联合的准确率为54%。U-Net或U-Net++语义分割网络作为医学图像处理的经典全卷积网络,在砂岩显微图像的定量识别方面也有很好的表现。在确定各砂岩骨架颗粒比例后,根据经典的Dickinson砂岩分类标准确定砂岩的简单细分描述性岩相分类。换句话说,目前大多数深度学习算法都是在大块岩石层面对砂岩进行分类,但U-Net模型已扩展到矿物层面进行综合识别。基于视觉的砂岩岩性识别模型不仅提高了人工识别的精度,而且减少了传统人工处理和专家决策方法的不稳定性和主观性。在未来,我们计划增加标记薄片图像的数量和覆盖范围,以评估对U-Net或U-Net++模型准确性和一致性的影响,并扩展识别其他陆源碎屑岩的方法。进一步,我们希望提高模型的颗粒识别能力,如从“石英”中识别单晶和多晶石英,从“长石”中识别钾长石和斜长石,从“岩屑”中识别火成岩、变质岩和沉积岩屑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantitative Identification of Sandstone Lithology Based On Thin-Section Micrographs Using the U-net and U-net++ Semantic Segmentation Network
Quantitative identification of sandstone microscopic images is an essential task for sandstone reservoir characterization. The widely-used classical Gazzi-Dickinson point-counting method can be subjective, inconsistent and time-consuming. Furthermore, by directly putting labeled microscopic images of all rock types into image recognition models for training, most previous studies did not address the petrographic principle of artificial identification. In this study, U-Net and U-Net++ semantic segmentation networks that incorporated the sandstone petrographic principle in quantitative identification of sandstone was introduced. Automatic identification of sandstone microscopic images requires prior knowledge learned from the identified sandstones with similar compositions. First, hundreds of thin-sections of typical sandstone reservoirs were selected from several key petroleum basins in China. Second, one-to-one single and orthogonal polarized images were taken for them. Third, the annotation software was used to label the type of each skeleton grain, including quartz, feldspar, lithic fragment and pore. Finally, 480 sets of data, each of which includes single and orthogonal polarized images and their ".json" format annotation results, were obtained for training and testing of the U-Net model to quantitatively analyze sandstone microscopic images. Within the 480 sets of data, 6798 sandstone skeleton grains, including 4542 quartzes, 796 feldspars, 1248 lithic fragments and 212 pores were labeled. The sandstone thin-section quantitative identification model trained by 392 data sets achieved a training accuracy of 96% with the intersection over union at 78% for quartz, and a training accuracy of 88% with the intersection over union at 56% for lithic fragments. The remaining 88 data sets were used for testing, and the accuracy was 87% with its intersection over union at 74% for quartz and a training accuracy of 77% with the intersection over union at 54% for lithic fragments. As a classic fully convolutional network that excels in processing medical images, the U-Net or U-Net++ semantic segmentation network has also performed very well in quantitative identification of sandstone microscopic images. After the proportion of each sandstone skeleton grain has been identified, the simple subdivision descriptive petrographic classification of the sandstone was determined according to the classic Dickinson sandstone taxonomic criteria. In other words, most current deep learning algorithms classify sandstones at the bulk rock level, but this U-Net model has been extended to the mineral level for comprehensive identification. Our vision-based sandstone lithology identification model has not only improved the accuracy of artificial identification but also reduced the instability and subjectivity of the traditional manual processing and expert decision-making approach. In the future, we plan to increase the number and coverage of labeled thin-section images to evaluate the impact on the accuracy and consistency of the U-Net or U-Net++ model, and to expand the approach to identify other terrigenous clastic rock. Furthermore, we hope to improve the capability of the model to identify grains, such as monocrystalline and polycrystalline quartz from "quartz", K-feldspar and plagioclase from "feldspar", and igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary lithic fragments from "lithic fragments".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Proper Well Spacings – A Supplementary Method to Maximize The Gulf of Thailand Development Project Value Seismic Driven Machine Learning to Improve Precision and Accelerate Screening Shallow Gas Potentials in Tunu Shallow Gas Zone, Mahakam Delta, Indonesia Rejuvenating Waterflood Reservoir in a Complex Geological Setting of a Matured Brown Field Intelligent Prediction of Downhole Drillstring Vibrations in Horizontal Wells by Employing Artificial Neural Network Sand Fill Clean-Out on Wireline Enables Access to Additional Perforation Zones in Gas Well Producer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1