{"title":"管道钢和环焊缝疲劳裂纹扩展评价","authors":"D. Park, Jie Liang, J. Gravel","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-80320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fatigue test specimens were prepared and tested with an API 5L X70 spiral welded pipe steel and girth weld. For a few selected specimens, two unloading compliance techniques (elastic compliance and back-face strain compliance) were applied simultaneously to a single specimen for direct comparisons of in-situ crack size estimation. This paper also includes fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) data of other pipe steels and welds available in the literature. It was observed that most FCGR curves of pipeline steels (X65∼X100) remained within the BS 7910 mean and upper bound design curves in the Paris region. On the contrary, the fatigue crack growth rate of the X42 pipeline steel from a reference was high — a very steep slope of the FCGR curve, crossing over the BS 7910 design criteria. It was noted that the FCGR of austenitic stainless pipe steel and girth weld obtained from Arora et al. (2014) showed a very excellent fatigue property.","PeriodicalId":434862,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"303 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue Crack Growth Assessment of Pipeline Steels and Girth Welds\",\"authors\":\"D. Park, Jie Liang, J. Gravel\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2022-80320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Fatigue test specimens were prepared and tested with an API 5L X70 spiral welded pipe steel and girth weld. For a few selected specimens, two unloading compliance techniques (elastic compliance and back-face strain compliance) were applied simultaneously to a single specimen for direct comparisons of in-situ crack size estimation. This paper also includes fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) data of other pipe steels and welds available in the literature. It was observed that most FCGR curves of pipeline steels (X65∼X100) remained within the BS 7910 mean and upper bound design curves in the Paris region. On the contrary, the fatigue crack growth rate of the X42 pipeline steel from a reference was high — a very steep slope of the FCGR curve, crossing over the BS 7910 design criteria. It was noted that the FCGR of austenitic stainless pipe steel and girth weld obtained from Arora et al. (2014) showed a very excellent fatigue property.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication\",\"volume\":\"303 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-80320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-80320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用API 5L X70螺旋焊管钢和环焊缝制备了疲劳试验试样。对选取的少数试件,同时采用弹性柔度和后面应变柔度两种卸载柔度技术对单个试件进行原位裂纹尺寸估算的直接比较。本文还包括文献中其他管材和焊缝的疲劳裂纹扩展速率(FCGR)数据。在巴黎地区,大多数管道钢(X65 ~ X100)的FCGR曲线保持在BS 7910的平均值和上限设计曲线内。相反,参考的X42管线钢的疲劳裂纹扩展速率很高——FCGR曲线的斜率非常陡,超过了BS 7910设计标准。值得注意的是,Arora et al.(2014)获得的奥氏体不锈钢管钢和环焊缝的FCGR表现出非常优异的疲劳性能。
Fatigue Crack Growth Assessment of Pipeline Steels and Girth Welds
Fatigue test specimens were prepared and tested with an API 5L X70 spiral welded pipe steel and girth weld. For a few selected specimens, two unloading compliance techniques (elastic compliance and back-face strain compliance) were applied simultaneously to a single specimen for direct comparisons of in-situ crack size estimation. This paper also includes fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) data of other pipe steels and welds available in the literature. It was observed that most FCGR curves of pipeline steels (X65∼X100) remained within the BS 7910 mean and upper bound design curves in the Paris region. On the contrary, the fatigue crack growth rate of the X42 pipeline steel from a reference was high — a very steep slope of the FCGR curve, crossing over the BS 7910 design criteria. It was noted that the FCGR of austenitic stainless pipe steel and girth weld obtained from Arora et al. (2014) showed a very excellent fatigue property.