伽达默尔诠释学作为社会研究中定量和定性方法的综合

E. Moya
{"title":"伽达默尔诠释学作为社会研究中定量和定性方法的综合","authors":"E. Moya","doi":"10.4067/s0718-50652019000100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dispute between the supporters of quantitative and qualitative approaches within the social sciences continues to be present. However, when examining the problem the accent has always been placed on the methodological edges of the discussion, leaving aside the epistemological and philosophical elements that may be in the background. In this way, it is understood that a more significant solution to the issue must necessarily come through a philosophical proposal, which, together with raising a foundation for reality or its knowledge, can also be linked to the most relevant characteristics of each approach. In this context, the present paper seeks to propose the hermeneutic of Hans–Georg Gadamer as a possible solution to the mentioned differences, because its universal scope, its accentuation in the interpretation and its circular notion of human understanding provide it with elements that associate it clearly with the philosophy, the epistemology, the qualitative research and the quantitative research.","PeriodicalId":111465,"journal":{"name":"Límite (Arica)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LA HERMENÉUTICA GADAMERIANA COMO SÍNTESIS ENTRE EL ENFOQUE CUANTITATIVO Y CUALITATIVO EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN SOCIAL\",\"authors\":\"E. Moya\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-50652019000100204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dispute between the supporters of quantitative and qualitative approaches within the social sciences continues to be present. However, when examining the problem the accent has always been placed on the methodological edges of the discussion, leaving aside the epistemological and philosophical elements that may be in the background. In this way, it is understood that a more significant solution to the issue must necessarily come through a philosophical proposal, which, together with raising a foundation for reality or its knowledge, can also be linked to the most relevant characteristics of each approach. In this context, the present paper seeks to propose the hermeneutic of Hans–Georg Gadamer as a possible solution to the mentioned differences, because its universal scope, its accentuation in the interpretation and its circular notion of human understanding provide it with elements that associate it clearly with the philosophy, the epistemology, the qualitative research and the quantitative research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Límite (Arica)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Límite (Arica)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50652019000100204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Límite (Arica)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50652019000100204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

社会科学中定量方法和定性方法的支持者之间的争论仍然存在。然而,在研究这个问题时,重点总是放在讨论的方法论边缘,而忽略了可能在背景中的认识论和哲学因素。这样,就可以理解,这个问题的一个更有意义的解决办法必须通过一项哲学建议来实现,这一建议在为现实或对现实的认识建立基础的同时,也可以与每一种方法的最相关特征联系起来。在这种背景下,本文试图提出汉斯-乔治·伽达默尔的解释学作为上述差异的可能解决方案,因为它的普遍范围,它在解释中的强调和它的人类理解的循环概念为它提供了与哲学,认识论,定性研究和定量研究清晰地联系在一起的元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LA HERMENÉUTICA GADAMERIANA COMO SÍNTESIS ENTRE EL ENFOQUE CUANTITATIVO Y CUALITATIVO EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN SOCIAL
The dispute between the supporters of quantitative and qualitative approaches within the social sciences continues to be present. However, when examining the problem the accent has always been placed on the methodological edges of the discussion, leaving aside the epistemological and philosophical elements that may be in the background. In this way, it is understood that a more significant solution to the issue must necessarily come through a philosophical proposal, which, together with raising a foundation for reality or its knowledge, can also be linked to the most relevant characteristics of each approach. In this context, the present paper seeks to propose the hermeneutic of Hans–Georg Gadamer as a possible solution to the mentioned differences, because its universal scope, its accentuation in the interpretation and its circular notion of human understanding provide it with elements that associate it clearly with the philosophy, the epistemology, the qualitative research and the quantitative research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enseñando a pensar críticamente mediante la analogía Da Grécia antiga à clínica moderna: Uma análise das influências estoicas nas terapias cognitivas de Ellis e de Beck Estudio fenomenológico experimental de la empatía por dolor en adulto mayor sano Hacia una política de la memoria. Perspectivas de Walter Benjamin y Georges Didi-Huberman en torno a la imagen La afinidad ontológico/veritativa entre poesía y filosofía
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1