用多因素模型评价共同基金绩效

Marno Verbeek, J. Huij
{"title":"用多因素模型评价共同基金绩效","authors":"Marno Verbeek, J. Huij","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.906723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"We show that multifactor performance estimates for mutual funds suffer from systematic biases and argue that these biases are a result of miscalculating the factor premiums. Because the factor proxies are based on hypothetical stock portfolios and do not incorporate transaction costs, trade impact, and trading restrictions, the factor premiums are either over- or underestimated. We argue that factor proxies based on mutual fund returns rather than on stock returns provide better benchmarks to evaluate professional money managers.\" Copyright (c) 2009 Financial Management Association International..","PeriodicalId":308975,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings (Archive)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Use of Multifactor Models to Evaluate Mutual Fund Performance\",\"authors\":\"Marno Verbeek, J. Huij\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.906723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"We show that multifactor performance estimates for mutual funds suffer from systematic biases and argue that these biases are a result of miscalculating the factor premiums. Because the factor proxies are based on hypothetical stock portfolios and do not incorporate transaction costs, trade impact, and trading restrictions, the factor premiums are either over- or underestimated. We argue that factor proxies based on mutual fund returns rather than on stock returns provide better benchmarks to evaluate professional money managers.\\\" Copyright (c) 2009 Financial Management Association International..\",\"PeriodicalId\":308975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings (Archive)\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.906723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.906723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

“我们表明,对共同基金的多因素业绩估计存在系统性偏差,并认为这些偏差是错误计算因素溢价的结果。由于因子代理是基于假设的股票投资组合,不包括交易成本、交易影响和交易限制,因此因子溢价要么被高估,要么被低估。我们认为,基于共同基金回报而非股票回报的因子代理为评估专业基金经理提供了更好的基准。”版权所有(c) 2009国际财务管理协会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Use of Multifactor Models to Evaluate Mutual Fund Performance
"We show that multifactor performance estimates for mutual funds suffer from systematic biases and argue that these biases are a result of miscalculating the factor premiums. Because the factor proxies are based on hypothetical stock portfolios and do not incorporate transaction costs, trade impact, and trading restrictions, the factor premiums are either over- or underestimated. We argue that factor proxies based on mutual fund returns rather than on stock returns provide better benchmarks to evaluate professional money managers." Copyright (c) 2009 Financial Management Association International..
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Debt Maturity and the Dynamics of Leverage Corporate Governance and the Design of Stock Option Contracts Dynamic Asset Allocation with Stochastic Income and Interest Rates Can Short-Sellers Predict Returns? Daily Evidence On the Use of Multifactor Models to Evaluate Mutual Fund Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1