{"title":"结论","authors":"Alexus McLeod","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197505915.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conclusion considers some of the implications of early Chinese views of mental illness and self-cultivation for contemporary thought concerning mental illness. I argue that some of the views of early Chinese thinkers can be adapted using contemporary conceptions of mental illness, and that difficulties for certain kinds of character, virtue, and role ethics that arise surrounding issues of mental illness might be solved by adapting these views to contemporary contexts.","PeriodicalId":164762,"journal":{"name":"The Dao of Madness","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion\",\"authors\":\"Alexus McLeod\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197505915.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conclusion considers some of the implications of early Chinese views of mental illness and self-cultivation for contemporary thought concerning mental illness. I argue that some of the views of early Chinese thinkers can be adapted using contemporary conceptions of mental illness, and that difficulties for certain kinds of character, virtue, and role ethics that arise surrounding issues of mental illness might be solved by adapting these views to contemporary contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Dao of Madness\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Dao of Madness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197505915.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Dao of Madness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197505915.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The conclusion considers some of the implications of early Chinese views of mental illness and self-cultivation for contemporary thought concerning mental illness. I argue that some of the views of early Chinese thinkers can be adapted using contemporary conceptions of mental illness, and that difficulties for certain kinds of character, virtue, and role ethics that arise surrounding issues of mental illness might be solved by adapting these views to contemporary contexts.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
