预防工作事故的“代理模式”与经济激励

J. C. Aguiar, Juliana Carreiro Corbal Oitaven
{"title":"预防工作事故的“代理模式”与经济激励","authors":"J. C. Aguiar, Juliana Carreiro Corbal Oitaven","doi":"10.18593/EJJL.13793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : This article connects the “agency model” with the fundamental right to the prevention of occupational accidents, from the point of view of Law and Economics. Based on an approach to the necessary effectiveness of social rights related to the reduction of labour inherent risks, prevention is affirmed as a human and fundamental right, while it is shown that accidents still occur frequently in Brazil and all the world, what demonstrates a disrespectful reality to the precautionary principle. The study also deals with the social costs of occupational accidents and the current economic incentives to the prevention choice, facing microeconomic concepts and costs with prevention and repair notions, as well as benefits with the adoption of preventive measures. Finally, the agency problem is presented, showing the relation between the “agent” employer and the “agent” employee facing the society, while presents the contribution of this model to stimulate the choice for prevention, attributing the obligation of monitoring the employee to the employer, which is who can run it more efficiently. Keywords : Fundamental rights. Occupational accident. Prevention. Law and economics. Agency model.","PeriodicalId":206661,"journal":{"name":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O “modelo de agência” e os incentivos econômicos à prevenção dos acidentes de trabalho\",\"authors\":\"J. C. Aguiar, Juliana Carreiro Corbal Oitaven\",\"doi\":\"10.18593/EJJL.13793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract : This article connects the “agency model” with the fundamental right to the prevention of occupational accidents, from the point of view of Law and Economics. Based on an approach to the necessary effectiveness of social rights related to the reduction of labour inherent risks, prevention is affirmed as a human and fundamental right, while it is shown that accidents still occur frequently in Brazil and all the world, what demonstrates a disrespectful reality to the precautionary principle. The study also deals with the social costs of occupational accidents and the current economic incentives to the prevention choice, facing microeconomic concepts and costs with prevention and repair notions, as well as benefits with the adoption of preventive measures. Finally, the agency problem is presented, showing the relation between the “agent” employer and the “agent” employee facing the society, while presents the contribution of this model to stimulate the choice for prevention, attributing the obligation of monitoring the employee to the employer, which is who can run it more efficiently. Keywords : Fundamental rights. Occupational accident. Prevention. Law and economics. Agency model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18593/EJJL.13793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18593/EJJL.13793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文从法学和经济学的角度,将“代理模式”与职业事故预防的基本权利联系起来。根据对与减少劳动固有风险有关的社会权利的必要有效性的办法,预防被确认为一项人权和基本权利,同时表明事故在巴西和全世界仍然经常发生,这表明对预防原则的不尊重的现实。研究还涉及职业事故的社会成本和当前预防选择的经济激励,面对微观经济概念和预防和修复概念的成本,以及采取预防措施的效益。最后,提出了代理问题,展示了面对社会的“代理”雇主与“代理”雇员之间的关系,并提出了该模型对激励预防选择的贡献,将监督雇员的义务归因于雇主,即谁能更有效地运行。关键词:基本权利;职业事故。预防。法律和经济学。代理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O “modelo de agência” e os incentivos econômicos à prevenção dos acidentes de trabalho
Abstract : This article connects the “agency model” with the fundamental right to the prevention of occupational accidents, from the point of view of Law and Economics. Based on an approach to the necessary effectiveness of social rights related to the reduction of labour inherent risks, prevention is affirmed as a human and fundamental right, while it is shown that accidents still occur frequently in Brazil and all the world, what demonstrates a disrespectful reality to the precautionary principle. The study also deals with the social costs of occupational accidents and the current economic incentives to the prevention choice, facing microeconomic concepts and costs with prevention and repair notions, as well as benefits with the adoption of preventive measures. Finally, the agency problem is presented, showing the relation between the “agent” employer and the “agent” employee facing the society, while presents the contribution of this model to stimulate the choice for prevention, attributing the obligation of monitoring the employee to the employer, which is who can run it more efficiently. Keywords : Fundamental rights. Occupational accident. Prevention. Law and economics. Agency model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDITORAÇÃO, CULTURA CIENTÍFICA NO BRASIL E OS 20 ANOS DA EJJL O direito fundamental a tratamento não discriminatório como limite para a extinção do contrato de emprego da pessoa com doença geradora de estigma ou preconceito Cuidado e direitos fundamentais: o caso do habeas corpus coletivo para pais e responsáveis por crianças e pessoas com deficiência Los derechos de la naturaleza: un paso adelante, tres atrás O debate entre Mart Suzi (IBF) e Robert Alexy (WF), organizado na obra proporcionalidade e internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1