{"title":"分析消息及其结果:有问题的假设，可能的解决方案","authors":"R. Street","doi":"10.1080/10417949309372891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most popular traditions in communication research is the study of “message effects,” the impact of particular message features on a recipient's evaluative, perceptual, and behavioral response to the message. However, this research is not without its limitations. This essay examines several problems created by questionable assumptions frequently embraced by researchers. Several solutions to these problems are offered.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"65 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing messages and their outcomes: Questionable assumptions, possible solutions\",\"authors\":\"R. Street\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417949309372891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most popular traditions in communication research is the study of “message effects,” the impact of particular message features on a recipient's evaluative, perceptual, and behavioral response to the message. However, this research is not without its limitations. This essay examines several problems created by questionable assumptions frequently embraced by researchers. Several solutions to these problems are offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"65 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949309372891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949309372891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyzing messages and their outcomes: Questionable assumptions, possible solutions
One of the most popular traditions in communication research is the study of “message effects,” the impact of particular message features on a recipient's evaluative, perceptual, and behavioral response to the message. However, this research is not without its limitations. This essay examines several problems created by questionable assumptions frequently embraced by researchers. Several solutions to these problems are offered.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
