根本性矛盾?自由、强制与美国法律发展

Paul Baumgardner
{"title":"根本性矛盾?自由、强制与美国法律发展","authors":"Paul Baumgardner","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>In</i> Liberty and Coercion: The Paradox of American Government from the Founding to the Present<i>, Gary Gerstle offers an ambitious account of American legal development from our nation's founding up to the present day. In many ways, Gerstle's account is in keeping with the long scholarly tradition of linking legal liberalism with changes in American law and politics. However</i>, Liberty and Coercion <i>also calls to mind critical legal scholarship, most notably Duncan Kennedy's “The Structure of Blackstone's Commentaries” and the idea of the fundamental contradiction. After reconstructing Kennedy's central claims, I highlight how they actually undermine</i> Liberty and Coercion <i>and jeopardize the larger legal liberal tradition</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12289","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fundamental Contradiction Redux? Liberty, Coercion, and American Legal Development\",\"authors\":\"Paul Baumgardner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lsi.12289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>In</i> Liberty and Coercion: The Paradox of American Government from the Founding to the Present<i>, Gary Gerstle offers an ambitious account of American legal development from our nation's founding up to the present day. In many ways, Gerstle's account is in keeping with the long scholarly tradition of linking legal liberalism with changes in American law and politics. However</i>, Liberty and Coercion <i>also calls to mind critical legal scholarship, most notably Duncan Kennedy's “The Structure of Blackstone's Commentaries” and the idea of the fundamental contradiction. After reconstructing Kennedy's central claims, I highlight how they actually undermine</i> Liberty and Coercion <i>and jeopardize the larger legal liberal tradition</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12289\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lsi.12289\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lsi.12289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《自由与强制:美国政府从建国到现在的悖论》一书中,加里·格斯特尔对美国从建国到现在的法律发展进行了雄心勃勃的描述。在许多方面,格斯特尔的叙述符合将法律自由主义与美国法律和政治的变化联系起来的长期学术传统。然而,《自由与强制》也让人想起批判性的法律学术,最著名的是邓肯·肯尼迪的《黑石评论的结构》和基本矛盾的观点。在重构肯尼迪的核心主张后,我强调了它们实际上是如何破坏自由和强制的,并危及更大的法律自由主义传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Fundamental Contradiction Redux? Liberty, Coercion, and American Legal Development

In Liberty and Coercion: The Paradox of American Government from the Founding to the Present, Gary Gerstle offers an ambitious account of American legal development from our nation's founding up to the present day. In many ways, Gerstle's account is in keeping with the long scholarly tradition of linking legal liberalism with changes in American law and politics. However, Liberty and Coercion also calls to mind critical legal scholarship, most notably Duncan Kennedy's “The Structure of Blackstone's Commentaries” and the idea of the fundamental contradiction. After reconstructing Kennedy's central claims, I highlight how they actually undermine Liberty and Coercion and jeopardize the larger legal liberal tradition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Mercy and the Construction of Social Control: A Four-Site Analysis of Clemency Exclusion from Within: Noncitizens and the Rise of Discriminatory Licensing Laws Legal Strategies at the Governance Precipice: Transnational Lawyers in the European Union’s Sovereign Debt Crisis (2010–2012) Aspirational Laws in Action: A Field Experiment Many Shades of Success: Bottom-up Indicators of Individual Success in Community Courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1