在一般实践中发生了什么:资本主义垄断和国家行政控制:一种职业救助?

K. White
{"title":"在一般实践中发生了什么:资本主义垄断和国家行政控制:一种职业救助?","authors":"K. White","doi":"10.5172/hesr.2000.10.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The argument of this paper is that the processes of corporatisation - the purchase of general practices by investment corporations - in combination with state surveillance initiatives are fundamentally restructuring general practice in Australia. There are three components to this argument, operating at the sociological, the political-economic, and policy levels. First, within sociology, any recourse to the theoretical model of ‘medical dominance’ no longer holds the explanatory power it once did to explain the position of the medical profession. Secondly, at the level of political economy, it is argued that the development of corporate investment will significantly transform general practice, away from non-profitable interventions, the servicing of at risk groups, or those in the non-urban areas, to population groups and interventions that are profitable. Thirdly, at the policy level, it is suggested that these developments raise important questions about the continued funding of a universal health care system, where public moneys are being accessed for private corporate investors, backed by speculators on the share market. The importance of this issue cannot be overstated in the context of vertical integration - the ownership of general practices, radiology, and pathology services, under the one corporate umbrella - where these companies anticipate that this integration will be a way of producing referrals from the GP through the system, with the goal of increasing profitability.","PeriodicalId":121033,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Health Social Science","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s happening in general practice: capitalist monopolisation and state administrative control: a profession bailing out?\",\"authors\":\"K. White\",\"doi\":\"10.5172/hesr.2000.10.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The argument of this paper is that the processes of corporatisation - the purchase of general practices by investment corporations - in combination with state surveillance initiatives are fundamentally restructuring general practice in Australia. There are three components to this argument, operating at the sociological, the political-economic, and policy levels. First, within sociology, any recourse to the theoretical model of ‘medical dominance’ no longer holds the explanatory power it once did to explain the position of the medical profession. Secondly, at the level of political economy, it is argued that the development of corporate investment will significantly transform general practice, away from non-profitable interventions, the servicing of at risk groups, or those in the non-urban areas, to population groups and interventions that are profitable. Thirdly, at the policy level, it is suggested that these developments raise important questions about the continued funding of a universal health care system, where public moneys are being accessed for private corporate investors, backed by speculators on the share market. The importance of this issue cannot be overstated in the context of vertical integration - the ownership of general practices, radiology, and pathology services, under the one corporate umbrella - where these companies anticipate that this integration will be a way of producing referrals from the GP through the system, with the goal of increasing profitability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Health Social Science\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Health Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2000.10.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Health Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2000.10.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文的论点是公司化的过程-由投资公司购买全科实践-与国家监督举措相结合,从根本上重组了澳大利亚的全科实践。这个论点有三个组成部分,分别在社会学、政治经济和政策层面上运作。首先,在社会学中,任何求助于“医学主导”的理论模型都不再具有它曾经解释医学职业地位的解释力。其次,在政治经济层面,有人认为,公司投资的发展将显著改变一般做法,从非营利性干预,服务于风险群体或非城市地区的人群,到有利可图的人口群体和干预。第三,在政策层面,有人认为,这些事态发展提出了关于全民医疗保健系统持续融资的重要问题,在这个系统中,由股票市场投机者支持的私人企业投资者正在获得公共资金。在垂直整合的背景下,这个问题的重要性再怎么强调也不为过——全科医生、放射科和病理服务的所有权,在一个公司的伞下——这些公司期望这种整合将成为一种通过系统从全科医生那里获得转诊的方式,目标是提高盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What’s happening in general practice: capitalist monopolisation and state administrative control: a profession bailing out?
Abstract The argument of this paper is that the processes of corporatisation - the purchase of general practices by investment corporations - in combination with state surveillance initiatives are fundamentally restructuring general practice in Australia. There are three components to this argument, operating at the sociological, the political-economic, and policy levels. First, within sociology, any recourse to the theoretical model of ‘medical dominance’ no longer holds the explanatory power it once did to explain the position of the medical profession. Secondly, at the level of political economy, it is argued that the development of corporate investment will significantly transform general practice, away from non-profitable interventions, the servicing of at risk groups, or those in the non-urban areas, to population groups and interventions that are profitable. Thirdly, at the policy level, it is suggested that these developments raise important questions about the continued funding of a universal health care system, where public moneys are being accessed for private corporate investors, backed by speculators on the share market. The importance of this issue cannot be overstated in the context of vertical integration - the ownership of general practices, radiology, and pathology services, under the one corporate umbrella - where these companies anticipate that this integration will be a way of producing referrals from the GP through the system, with the goal of increasing profitability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The politics of midwifery in Australia: tensions, debates and opportunities Multiple visions or multiple aversions? Consumer representation, consultation and participation in maternity issues Social mobilisation around the act of childbirth: subjectivity and politics Computerised hospital work: Fordism and Faylorism revisited What’s happening in general practice: capitalist monopolisation and state administrative control: a profession bailing out?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1