组织基础设施需求工程的偶然性观点

Karl Cox, S. Bleistein, P. Reynolds, A. Thorogood
{"title":"组织基础设施需求工程的偶然性观点","authors":"Karl Cox, S. Bleistein, P. Reynolds, A. Thorogood","doi":"10.1145/1141277.1141628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delivery of IT projects in today's rapidly changing business environment is a challenge. Conventional investment approaches result in lumpy capital allocations, which encourage managers to include many potential future business requirements in each capital request. This locks in the delivery of future requirements despite high market uncertainty. The resulting projects are large and complex from both a technical and management perspective. In the management literature, new frameworks are emerging that draw on Real Options valuations to justify early infrastructure investment and provide fine-grained control over business initiatives in an uncertain world. Business managers can then build on the infrastructure by selecting business initiatives to maximise option value. However, this requires engineering approaches that separates infrastructure and business requirements and minimises their dependencies. This paper explores a contingency approach to Requirements Engineering (RE) to minimise initial requirements and maximise future strategic options, challenging the research community's dominant paradigm of completeness, correctness and consistency.","PeriodicalId":269830,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A contingency view of organizational infrastructure requirements engineering\",\"authors\":\"Karl Cox, S. Bleistein, P. Reynolds, A. Thorogood\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1141277.1141628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Delivery of IT projects in today's rapidly changing business environment is a challenge. Conventional investment approaches result in lumpy capital allocations, which encourage managers to include many potential future business requirements in each capital request. This locks in the delivery of future requirements despite high market uncertainty. The resulting projects are large and complex from both a technical and management perspective. In the management literature, new frameworks are emerging that draw on Real Options valuations to justify early infrastructure investment and provide fine-grained control over business initiatives in an uncertain world. Business managers can then build on the infrastructure by selecting business initiatives to maximise option value. However, this requires engineering approaches that separates infrastructure and business requirements and minimises their dependencies. This paper explores a contingency approach to Requirements Engineering (RE) to minimise initial requirements and maximise future strategic options, challenging the research community's dominant paradigm of completeness, correctness and consistency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在当今快速变化的业务环境中交付IT项目是一项挑战。传统的投资方法导致了不稳定的资本配置,这鼓励管理者在每个资本请求中包含许多潜在的未来业务需求。这锁定了未来需求的交付,尽管市场存在很大的不确定性。从技术和管理的角度来看,由此产生的项目既大又复杂。在管理文献中,新的框架正在出现,这些框架利用实物期权估值来证明早期基础设施投资的合理性,并在不确定的世界中提供对业务计划的细粒度控制。然后,业务经理可以通过选择业务计划来构建基础设施,以最大化期权价值。然而,这需要分离基础设施和业务需求并最小化它们的依赖性的工程方法。本文探讨了需求工程(RE)的偶然性方法,以最小化初始需求并最大化未来的战略选择,挑战研究界的完整性、正确性和一致性的主导范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A contingency view of organizational infrastructure requirements engineering
Delivery of IT projects in today's rapidly changing business environment is a challenge. Conventional investment approaches result in lumpy capital allocations, which encourage managers to include many potential future business requirements in each capital request. This locks in the delivery of future requirements despite high market uncertainty. The resulting projects are large and complex from both a technical and management perspective. In the management literature, new frameworks are emerging that draw on Real Options valuations to justify early infrastructure investment and provide fine-grained control over business initiatives in an uncertain world. Business managers can then build on the infrastructure by selecting business initiatives to maximise option value. However, this requires engineering approaches that separates infrastructure and business requirements and minimises their dependencies. This paper explores a contingency approach to Requirements Engineering (RE) to minimise initial requirements and maximise future strategic options, challenging the research community's dominant paradigm of completeness, correctness and consistency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
File system framework for organizing sensor networks Editorial message: special track on operating systems and adaptive applications Simplifying transformation of software architecture constraints Session details: Software engineering: sound solutions for the 21st century To infinity and beyond or, avoiding the infinite in security protocol analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1