可视化互操作性:ARH、聚合、合理化和协调

Michael Currie, Meigan Geileskey, L. Nevile, R. Woodman
{"title":"可视化互操作性:ARH、聚合、合理化和协调","authors":"Michael Currie, Meigan Geileskey, L. Nevile, R. Woodman","doi":"10.1400/39306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a visualisation of interoperability to assist real-world deployment of metadata. \n \nFor some time, resource managers in many organisations have been acting on faith, creating 'standards compliant' metadata with the aim of exposing their resources to provide interoperability in discovery activities. In some cases, their faith has led them to miss the very essence of the work they are doing, and they have not got what they worked for. \n \nThe authors report a case study involving government agencies in Victoria, Australia. A number of departmental agencies have implemented, more or less, the DC-based Australian Government Locator Service (AGLS) application profile, at least for their web resources. They have done this with care and precision, with the long-term aim of developing a fully interoperable system. In the case study, typical would-be records for seven government departments were studied and it was shown that the tiniest, and typical, variation in use of the standard can be expected to thwart the aims of interoperability in significant ways. \n \nIn the context of the government's move to seeking interoperable metadata for all resources, including those within document management systems, the authors make visible how a small 'creep' can lead away from interoperability and how it might be contained in the future. They use a 3-step approach of 'aggregation, rationalisation and harmonisation' to expose the problems with 'nearly good enough' interoperability and the benefits of good interoperability, and encourage true harmonisation.","PeriodicalId":122537,"journal":{"name":"Dublin Core Conference","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualising Interoperability: ARH, Aggregation, Rationalisation and Harmonisation\",\"authors\":\"Michael Currie, Meigan Geileskey, L. Nevile, R. Woodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/39306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a visualisation of interoperability to assist real-world deployment of metadata. \\n \\nFor some time, resource managers in many organisations have been acting on faith, creating 'standards compliant' metadata with the aim of exposing their resources to provide interoperability in discovery activities. In some cases, their faith has led them to miss the very essence of the work they are doing, and they have not got what they worked for. \\n \\nThe authors report a case study involving government agencies in Victoria, Australia. A number of departmental agencies have implemented, more or less, the DC-based Australian Government Locator Service (AGLS) application profile, at least for their web resources. They have done this with care and precision, with the long-term aim of developing a fully interoperable system. In the case study, typical would-be records for seven government departments were studied and it was shown that the tiniest, and typical, variation in use of the standard can be expected to thwart the aims of interoperability in significant ways. \\n \\nIn the context of the government's move to seeking interoperable metadata for all resources, including those within document management systems, the authors make visible how a small 'creep' can lead away from interoperability and how it might be contained in the future. They use a 3-step approach of 'aggregation, rationalisation and harmonisation' to expose the problems with 'nearly good enough' interoperability and the benefits of good interoperability, and encourage true harmonisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dublin Core Conference\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dublin Core Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/39306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dublin Core Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/39306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文提出了一种互操作性的可视化方法,以帮助在现实世界中部署元数据。一段时间以来,许多组织的资源管理人员一直秉持信念,创建“符合标准”的元数据,目的是公开他们的资源,以便在发现活动中提供互操作性。在某些情况下,他们的信仰导致他们错过了他们所做工作的本质,他们没有得到他们所追求的东西。作者报告了一个涉及澳大利亚维多利亚州政府机构的案例研究。许多部门机构已经或多或少地实现了基于华盛顿特区的澳大利亚政府定位服务(AGLS)应用程序配置文件,至少对于他们的web资源是这样。他们以开发一个完全可互操作的系统为长期目标,谨慎而精确地完成了这项工作。在案例研究中,对七个政府部门的典型潜在记录进行了研究,结果表明,标准使用中最微小、最典型的变化可能会在很大程度上阻碍互操作性的目标。在政府为所有资源(包括文档管理系统中的资源)寻求可互操作元数据的背景下,作者揭示了一个小的“蠕变”是如何导致远离互操作性的,以及如何在未来遏制它。他们使用“聚合、合理化和协调”的三步方法来揭示“几乎足够好”互操作性的问题和良好互操作性的好处,并鼓励真正的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Visualising Interoperability: ARH, Aggregation, Rationalisation and Harmonisation
This paper proposes a visualisation of interoperability to assist real-world deployment of metadata. For some time, resource managers in many organisations have been acting on faith, creating 'standards compliant' metadata with the aim of exposing their resources to provide interoperability in discovery activities. In some cases, their faith has led them to miss the very essence of the work they are doing, and they have not got what they worked for. The authors report a case study involving government agencies in Victoria, Australia. A number of departmental agencies have implemented, more or less, the DC-based Australian Government Locator Service (AGLS) application profile, at least for their web resources. They have done this with care and precision, with the long-term aim of developing a fully interoperable system. In the case study, typical would-be records for seven government departments were studied and it was shown that the tiniest, and typical, variation in use of the standard can be expected to thwart the aims of interoperability in significant ways. In the context of the government's move to seeking interoperable metadata for all resources, including those within document management systems, the authors make visible how a small 'creep' can lead away from interoperability and how it might be contained in the future. They use a 3-step approach of 'aggregation, rationalisation and harmonisation' to expose the problems with 'nearly good enough' interoperability and the benefits of good interoperability, and encourage true harmonisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ORCID: Using API Calls to Assess Metadata Completeness Dolmen: A Linked Open Data Model to Enhance Museum Object Descriptions Digital Asset Management Systems: Open Source or Not Open Source? Understanding Metadata Needs when Migrating DAMS Bringing a Small Archival Collection to Life on the Web: Remembering the Real Winnie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1