“比如欧洲”

S. Glendinning
{"title":"“比如欧洲”","authors":"S. Glendinning","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1773709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to show why a philosophically informed approach to the question of Europe interrupts at least one doxa that underlies the orthodox thought of Europe as the site of a moribund worldview; namely, the construal of Europe as dominated by a political culture that is fundamentally compromised by an egregious and often implicit ‘racial theory’, ‘raciology’, or by an underlying ‘racial metaphysics’. The paper shows why this kind of matter-of-course understanding is inadequate, and points the way towards a more rounded and judicious conception of Europe’s entanglement with racism.","PeriodicalId":166384,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Politics of Race (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Europe, for Example'\",\"authors\":\"S. Glendinning\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1773709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to show why a philosophically informed approach to the question of Europe interrupts at least one doxa that underlies the orthodox thought of Europe as the site of a moribund worldview; namely, the construal of Europe as dominated by a political culture that is fundamentally compromised by an egregious and often implicit ‘racial theory’, ‘raciology’, or by an underlying ‘racial metaphysics’. The paper shows why this kind of matter-of-course understanding is inadequate, and points the way towards a more rounded and judicious conception of Europe’s entanglement with racism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Politics of Race (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Politics of Race (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1773709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Politics of Race (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1773709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

本文旨在说明,为什么对欧洲问题采取一种哲学上有根据的方法,至少会打断一种观点,这种观点是欧洲作为垂死世界观所在地的正统思想的基础;也就是说,对欧洲的解释是由一种政治文化主导的,这种文化从根本上受到一种令人震惊的、通常是含蓄的“种族理论”、“种族学”或潜在的“种族形而上学”的损害。这篇论文说明了为什么这种理所当然的理解是不够的,并指出了一条更全面、更明智地理解欧洲与种族主义纠缠的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Europe, for Example'
This paper aims to show why a philosophically informed approach to the question of Europe interrupts at least one doxa that underlies the orthodox thought of Europe as the site of a moribund worldview; namely, the construal of Europe as dominated by a political culture that is fundamentally compromised by an egregious and often implicit ‘racial theory’, ‘raciology’, or by an underlying ‘racial metaphysics’. The paper shows why this kind of matter-of-course understanding is inadequate, and points the way towards a more rounded and judicious conception of Europe’s entanglement with racism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why are there Racial Disparities in the Small Business Loan Market Race, Dignity, and Commerce Measuring Racial Discrimination in Algorithms Educational Redlining Does Race Matter for Police Use of Force? Evidence from 911 Calls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1