企业架构框架评估:能力、网络安全和弹性审查

Hilalah F. Al-Turkistani, Samar Aldobaian, R. Latif
{"title":"企业架构框架评估:能力、网络安全和弹性审查","authors":"Hilalah F. Al-Turkistani, Samar Aldobaian, R. Latif","doi":"10.1109/CAIDA51941.2021.9425343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent technological advancement demands organizations to have measures in place to manage their Information Technology (IT) systems. Enterprise Architecture Frameworks (EAF) offer companies an efficient technique to manage their IT systems aligning their business requirements with effective solutions. As a result, experts have developed multiple EAF’s such as TOGAF, Zachman, MoDAF, DoDAF, SABSA to help organizations to achieve their objectives by reducing the costs and complexity. These frameworks however, concentrate mostly on business needs lacking holistic enterprise-wide security practices, which may cause enterprises to be exposed for significant security risks resulting financial loss. This study focuses on evaluating business capabilities in TOGAF, NIST, COBIT, MoDAF, DoDAF, SABSA, and Zachman, and identify essential security requirements in TOGAF, SABSA and COBIT19 frameworks by comparing their resiliency processes, which helps organization to easily select applicable framework. The study shows that; besides business requirements, EAF need to include precise cybersecurity guidelines aligning EA business strategies. Enterprises now need to focus more on building resilient approach, which is beyond of protection, detection and prevention. Now enterprises should be ready to withstand against the cyber-attacks applying relevant cyber resiliency approach improving the way of dealing with impacts of cybersecurity risks.","PeriodicalId":272573,"journal":{"name":"2021 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (CAIDA)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Assessment: Capabilities, Cyber Security and Resiliency Review\",\"authors\":\"Hilalah F. Al-Turkistani, Samar Aldobaian, R. Latif\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CAIDA51941.2021.9425343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent technological advancement demands organizations to have measures in place to manage their Information Technology (IT) systems. Enterprise Architecture Frameworks (EAF) offer companies an efficient technique to manage their IT systems aligning their business requirements with effective solutions. As a result, experts have developed multiple EAF’s such as TOGAF, Zachman, MoDAF, DoDAF, SABSA to help organizations to achieve their objectives by reducing the costs and complexity. These frameworks however, concentrate mostly on business needs lacking holistic enterprise-wide security practices, which may cause enterprises to be exposed for significant security risks resulting financial loss. This study focuses on evaluating business capabilities in TOGAF, NIST, COBIT, MoDAF, DoDAF, SABSA, and Zachman, and identify essential security requirements in TOGAF, SABSA and COBIT19 frameworks by comparing their resiliency processes, which helps organization to easily select applicable framework. The study shows that; besides business requirements, EAF need to include precise cybersecurity guidelines aligning EA business strategies. Enterprises now need to focus more on building resilient approach, which is beyond of protection, detection and prevention. Now enterprises should be ready to withstand against the cyber-attacks applying relevant cyber resiliency approach improving the way of dealing with impacts of cybersecurity risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (CAIDA)\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (CAIDA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIDA51941.2021.9425343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (CAIDA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIDA51941.2021.9425343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

最近的技术进步要求组织有适当的措施来管理他们的信息技术(IT)系统。企业架构框架(EAF)为公司提供了一种有效的技术来管理他们的IT系统,使他们的业务需求与有效的解决方案保持一致。因此,专家们开发了多个EAF,如TOGAF、Zachman、MoDAF、DoDAF、SABSA,以帮助组织通过降低成本和复杂性来实现他们的目标。然而,这些框架主要关注业务需求,缺乏整体的企业范围的安全实践,这可能会导致企业暴露于严重的安全风险,从而导致财务损失。本研究着重于评估TOGAF、NIST、COBIT、MoDAF、DoDAF、SABSA和Zachman中的业务能力,并通过比较它们的弹性过程来确定TOGAF、SABSA和COBIT19框架中的基本安全需求,这有助于组织轻松地选择适用的框架。研究表明;除了业务需求外,EAF还需要包含精确的网络安全指导方针,以配合EA业务战略。企业现在需要更多地关注建立弹性方法,而不仅仅是保护、检测和预防。现在,企业应该做好抵御网络攻击的准备,应用相关的网络弹性方法,改进应对网络安全风险影响的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Assessment: Capabilities, Cyber Security and Resiliency Review
Recent technological advancement demands organizations to have measures in place to manage their Information Technology (IT) systems. Enterprise Architecture Frameworks (EAF) offer companies an efficient technique to manage their IT systems aligning their business requirements with effective solutions. As a result, experts have developed multiple EAF’s such as TOGAF, Zachman, MoDAF, DoDAF, SABSA to help organizations to achieve their objectives by reducing the costs and complexity. These frameworks however, concentrate mostly on business needs lacking holistic enterprise-wide security practices, which may cause enterprises to be exposed for significant security risks resulting financial loss. This study focuses on evaluating business capabilities in TOGAF, NIST, COBIT, MoDAF, DoDAF, SABSA, and Zachman, and identify essential security requirements in TOGAF, SABSA and COBIT19 frameworks by comparing their resiliency processes, which helps organization to easily select applicable framework. The study shows that; besides business requirements, EAF need to include precise cybersecurity guidelines aligning EA business strategies. Enterprises now need to focus more on building resilient approach, which is beyond of protection, detection and prevention. Now enterprises should be ready to withstand against the cyber-attacks applying relevant cyber resiliency approach improving the way of dealing with impacts of cybersecurity risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Melanoma Skin Lesions Classification using Deep Convolutional Neural Network with Transfer Learning A Comparison of Two-Stage Classifier Algorithm with Ensemble Techniques On Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy Predicting Congestive Heart Failure Risk Factors in King Abdulaziz Medical City A Machine Learning Approach Robotics: Biological Hypercomputation and Bio-Inspired Swarms Intelligence AI Support Marketing: Understanding the Customer Journey towards the Business Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1