处方中的决策

Swapnil Gupta, Rebecca Miller, J. Cahill
{"title":"处方中的决策","authors":"Swapnil Gupta, Rebecca Miller, J. Cahill","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780190654818.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses a framework for psycho-pharmacological decision-making and its applications specifically in the context of deprescribing. It introduces concepts and considerations involved in implementing shared decision-making, including how to create a constructive environment for conversations, stages of shared decision-making, and factors to consider that may impact both the provider and the patient. These decisions are especially difficult when doctors and patients disagree, when values or preferences conflict with standard guidelines, or simply when no guidelines are available. Identifying possible bias against making changes in medication regimens is highlighted, as well as the importance of honoring cultural preferences in the decision-making process.","PeriodicalId":296046,"journal":{"name":"Deprescribing in Psychiatry","volume":"1083 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-Making in Deprescribing\",\"authors\":\"Swapnil Gupta, Rebecca Miller, J. Cahill\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/MED/9780190654818.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter discusses a framework for psycho-pharmacological decision-making and its applications specifically in the context of deprescribing. It introduces concepts and considerations involved in implementing shared decision-making, including how to create a constructive environment for conversations, stages of shared decision-making, and factors to consider that may impact both the provider and the patient. These decisions are especially difficult when doctors and patients disagree, when values or preferences conflict with standard guidelines, or simply when no guidelines are available. Identifying possible bias against making changes in medication regimens is highlighted, as well as the importance of honoring cultural preferences in the decision-making process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deprescribing in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"1083 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deprescribing in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190654818.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deprescribing in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190654818.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章讨论了心理药理学决策的框架及其在处方的具体应用。它介绍了实施共同决策所涉及的概念和注意事项,包括如何为对话创造建设性的环境,共同决策的阶段,以及可能影响提供者和患者的考虑因素。当医生和病人意见不一致时,当价值观或偏好与标准指南发生冲突时,或者只是在没有可用指南的情况下,这些决定尤其困难。强调了在改变药物治疗方案时可能存在的偏见,以及在决策过程中尊重文化偏好的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision-Making in Deprescribing
This chapter discusses a framework for psycho-pharmacological decision-making and its applications specifically in the context of deprescribing. It introduces concepts and considerations involved in implementing shared decision-making, including how to create a constructive environment for conversations, stages of shared decision-making, and factors to consider that may impact both the provider and the patient. These decisions are especially difficult when doctors and patients disagree, when values or preferences conflict with standard guidelines, or simply when no guidelines are available. Identifying possible bias against making changes in medication regimens is highlighted, as well as the importance of honoring cultural preferences in the decision-making process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deprescribing Antipsychotic Medications Deprescribing Benzodiazepines, Z-Drugs, and Stimulants Nonpharmacological Aspects of Deprescribing Deprescribing Antidepressant Medications in Major Depressive Disorder Barriers to Deprescribing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1