捕捉印度尼西亚法律和正义的各种观念和全球视野

Ridwan Arifin
{"title":"捕捉印度尼西亚法律和正义的各种观念和全球视野","authors":"Ridwan Arifin","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.58480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discourse on the relationship between law and justice has long been the subject of debate and discussion ranging from philosophical to practical studies. This theme of the relationship between law and justice also gave birth to various schools of different legal thought. In fact, there is not a single school that denies that law is inseparable from justice. The difference is only when and what the measure of fairness is.1","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capturing Various Ideas of Law and Justice in Indonesia and Global Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Ridwan Arifin\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.58480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The discourse on the relationship between law and justice has long been the subject of debate and discussion ranging from philosophical to practical studies. This theme of the relationship between law and justice also gave birth to various schools of different legal thought. In fact, there is not a single school that denies that law is inseparable from justice. The difference is only when and what the measure of fairness is.1\",\"PeriodicalId\":292299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lex Scientia Law Review\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lex Scientia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.58480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Scientia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.58480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,法律与正义的关系一直是从哲学研究到实践研究的争论和讨论的主题。法律与正义的关系这一主题也催生了各种不同流派的法律思想。事实上,没有一个学派否认法律与正义是不可分割的。区别只在于什么时候和用什么标准来衡量公平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Capturing Various Ideas of Law and Justice in Indonesia and Global Perspective
The discourse on the relationship between law and justice has long been the subject of debate and discussion ranging from philosophical to practical studies. This theme of the relationship between law and justice also gave birth to various schools of different legal thought. In fact, there is not a single school that denies that law is inseparable from justice. The difference is only when and what the measure of fairness is.1
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positivization of Fatwas of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council in the Sharia Banking Law: Problems and Challenges Land Subsidence Policy in the Context of Good Governance Principles (Comparing Indonesia and Japan) Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Vietnam’s New Generation Free Trade Agreements – Challenges and Recommendations Rejection of Former Shia Community in Sampang Perspective on Human Rights Law: Discourse of Religious Rights and Freedom in Indonesia Comparative Analysis Between Employees Provident Fund (EPF) & Private Retirement Scheme (PRS) in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1