乌克兰宪法法院关于在欧洲人权法院的实际使用中乌克兰刑法第81条和第82条是否符合宪法的决定

Y. Surzik
{"title":"乌克兰宪法法院关于在欧洲人权法院的实际使用中乌克兰刑法第81条和第82条是否符合宪法的决定","authors":"Y. Surzik","doi":"10.31548/law2022.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study lies in the assessment and analysis of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the application of the provisions of Articles 81, 82 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which are unconstitutional because they violate the personal rights of those sentenced to life imprisonment because they cannot be applied. The decision on unconstitutionality is commensurate with the convention requirements due to the practice of the European Court. The purpose of the study is to examine the specific features of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine regarding the compliance of articles of criminal legislation with the Constitution of Ukraine, to analyse the functioning of the institution of clemency in international experience, to examine the practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the parole of persons sentenced to life imprisonment. The methods used to examine the subject are: comparative, legal recognition, logical and legal, hermeneutical, analysis methods. Among the results of the study are the determination of the fact of violation of the constitutional rights of convicts due to the lack of prospects for release from punishment; characteristics of the court's decision on the admissibility of the provisions of criminal legislation, considering convention requirements; disclosure of human rights violations by comparing life imprisonment with the end of a person's life cycle; analysis of the practice of the European Court regarding the Prohibition of the use of life imprisonment. The paper also suggests ways to solve these problems. It is proved that the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine satisfies the Convention requirements. The provisions disclosed in the study will be useful for analysing court decisions and creating recommendations for overcoming gaps in criminal legislation to harmonise it with the Constitution of Ukraine and comply with its obligations to protect human rights and dignity.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLES 81, 82 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE IN THE PRACTICAL USE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS\",\"authors\":\"Y. Surzik\",\"doi\":\"10.31548/law2022.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the study lies in the assessment and analysis of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the application of the provisions of Articles 81, 82 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which are unconstitutional because they violate the personal rights of those sentenced to life imprisonment because they cannot be applied. The decision on unconstitutionality is commensurate with the convention requirements due to the practice of the European Court. The purpose of the study is to examine the specific features of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine regarding the compliance of articles of criminal legislation with the Constitution of Ukraine, to analyse the functioning of the institution of clemency in international experience, to examine the practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the parole of persons sentenced to life imprisonment. The methods used to examine the subject are: comparative, legal recognition, logical and legal, hermeneutical, analysis methods. Among the results of the study are the determination of the fact of violation of the constitutional rights of convicts due to the lack of prospects for release from punishment; characteristics of the court's decision on the admissibility of the provisions of criminal legislation, considering convention requirements; disclosure of human rights violations by comparing life imprisonment with the end of a person's life cycle; analysis of the practice of the European Court regarding the Prohibition of the use of life imprisonment. The paper also suggests ways to solve these problems. It is proved that the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine satisfies the Convention requirements. The provisions disclosed in the study will be useful for analysing court decisions and creating recommendations for overcoming gaps in criminal legislation to harmonise it with the Constitution of Ukraine and comply with its obligations to protect human rights and dignity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law. Human. Environment\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law. Human. Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2022.03.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2022.03.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究的相关性在于评估和分析乌克兰宪法法院关于适用《乌克兰刑法》第81条和第82条规定的决定,这些规定是违宪的,因为它们侵犯了被判处终身监禁者的人身权利,因为它们不能适用。由于欧洲法院的惯例,关于违宪的决定与公约要求相称。这项研究的目的是审查乌克兰宪法法院关于刑事立法条款是否符合乌克兰宪法的决定的具体特点,分析国际经验中宽恕制度的运作情况,审查欧洲人权法院关于被判处终身监禁的人假释的做法。研究这一问题的方法有:比较法、法律承认法、逻辑法、解释法、分析法。这项研究的结果包括确定由于没有获释的前景而侵犯罪犯的宪法权利的事实;考虑到公约的要求,法院对刑事立法规定的可采性的决定的特点;通过将终身监禁与一个人生命周期的结束进行比较来披露侵犯人权的行为;分析欧洲法院关于禁止使用终身监禁的做法。本文还提出了解决这些问题的途径。事实证明,乌克兰宪法法院的决定符合《公约》的要求。研究报告中披露的规定将有助于分析法院判决并提出建议,以克服刑事立法方面的差距,使其与乌克兰宪法相协调,并履行其保护人权和尊严的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLES 81, 82 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE IN THE PRACTICAL USE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
The relevance of the study lies in the assessment and analysis of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the application of the provisions of Articles 81, 82 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which are unconstitutional because they violate the personal rights of those sentenced to life imprisonment because they cannot be applied. The decision on unconstitutionality is commensurate with the convention requirements due to the practice of the European Court. The purpose of the study is to examine the specific features of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine regarding the compliance of articles of criminal legislation with the Constitution of Ukraine, to analyse the functioning of the institution of clemency in international experience, to examine the practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the parole of persons sentenced to life imprisonment. The methods used to examine the subject are: comparative, legal recognition, logical and legal, hermeneutical, analysis methods. Among the results of the study are the determination of the fact of violation of the constitutional rights of convicts due to the lack of prospects for release from punishment; characteristics of the court's decision on the admissibility of the provisions of criminal legislation, considering convention requirements; disclosure of human rights violations by comparing life imprisonment with the end of a person's life cycle; analysis of the practice of the European Court regarding the Prohibition of the use of life imprisonment. The paper also suggests ways to solve these problems. It is proved that the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine satisfies the Convention requirements. The provisions disclosed in the study will be useful for analysing court decisions and creating recommendations for overcoming gaps in criminal legislation to harmonise it with the Constitution of Ukraine and comply with its obligations to protect human rights and dignity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative liability of juveniles for smoking Epistemological construction doctrine of the veterinary care defect phenomenon in forensic veterinary examination International experience in the use of alternative energy sources (within the European Union) Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights The role of collective-contractual regulation in ensuring the right of agricultural workers to a safe and healthy working environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1