FRCA, FFICANZCA Ken Hillman (Director, Division of Critical Care), FANZCA, FFICANZCA Gillian Bishop (Director, Intensive Care Unit), FRACP Peter Bristow (Intensivist)
{"title":"晶体与胶体之争:现状","authors":"FRCA, FFICANZCA Ken Hillman (Director, Division of Critical Care), FANZCA, FFICANZCA Gillian Bishop (Director, Intensive Care Unit), FRACP Peter Bristow (Intensivist)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80003-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ‘crystalloid-colloid debate’ has a history clouded by practical issues of availability of colloids. The two kinds of solutions have different physical properties and different roles. While crystalloids can replete the circulation, they do so at the expense of a larger fluid load to the body which may have drawbacks.</p><p>Studies comparing mortality between the use of crystalloids and colloids have shown differing results. A definitive answer is unlikely from such studies. Early vigorous restoration of the circulation is more important.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80610,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80003-7","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1 The crystalloid versus colloid controversy: present status\",\"authors\":\"FRCA, FFICANZCA Ken Hillman (Director, Division of Critical Care), FANZCA, FFICANZCA Gillian Bishop (Director, Intensive Care Unit), FRACP Peter Bristow (Intensivist)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80003-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ‘crystalloid-colloid debate’ has a history clouded by practical issues of availability of colloids. The two kinds of solutions have different physical properties and different roles. While crystalloids can replete the circulation, they do so at the expense of a larger fluid load to the body which may have drawbacks.</p><p>Studies comparing mortality between the use of crystalloids and colloids have shown differing results. A definitive answer is unlikely from such studies. Early vigorous restoration of the circulation is more important.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80003-7\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950350197800037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950350197800037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
1 The crystalloid versus colloid controversy: present status
The ‘crystalloid-colloid debate’ has a history clouded by practical issues of availability of colloids. The two kinds of solutions have different physical properties and different roles. While crystalloids can replete the circulation, they do so at the expense of a larger fluid load to the body which may have drawbacks.
Studies comparing mortality between the use of crystalloids and colloids have shown differing results. A definitive answer is unlikely from such studies. Early vigorous restoration of the circulation is more important.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
