S. Islam, Afzalur Rahman, A. Chowdhury, Mohsin Ahmed, K. K. Karmakar, M. U. Firoz, Mohammad Arifur Rahman, M. Haque, Mohammad Sadaqul Islam Sikdar, Ashrafuzzaman Tamal, A. Islam, Muhammad Ruhul Amin, Abeeda Tasnim Reza, F. Cader
{"title":"原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者手术结果的句法评分","authors":"S. Islam, Afzalur Rahman, A. Chowdhury, Mohsin Ahmed, K. K. Karmakar, M. U. Firoz, Mohammad Arifur Rahman, M. Haque, Mohammad Sadaqul Islam Sikdar, Ashrafuzzaman Tamal, A. Islam, Muhammad Ruhul Amin, Abeeda Tasnim Reza, F. Cader","doi":"10.3329/BHJ.V34I1.41902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Limited contemporary data exist regarding the impact of SYNTAX score on procedural outcomes undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in acute STEMI patients. \nObjectives: To evaluate the significance of the SYNTAX score for predicting procedural outcome after primary PCI in patient with acute STEMI. \nMethods: This perspective observational study was conducted in the department of cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Dhaka, Bangladesh from September, 2015 to September, 2016. 42 patients with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI were considered for the study. But 2 patients were excluded from the study due to failure of primary PCI. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (low Syntax score d”22) and Group II (high Syntax score > 22). The Syntax score of all patients were calculated from an initial coronary angiogram before primary PCI. Procedural outcome was observed in between two groups. \nResults: Among study patients 57.5% were in SYNTAX score d”22 (Group I) and 42.5% were in SYNTAX score >22 (Group II). Among traditional cardiovascular risk factors diabetes was significantly more prevalent in the Group II than Group I ( 82.4% vs 34.8%, p  0.003). Angiographic profile revealed maximum (69.6% vs 17.6%) culprit lesion in LAD artery in Group I and maximum culprit lesion (64.7% vs 21.7%) in RCA in Group II, these were the statistically significant between Group I and Group II (P<0.05). The high SYNTAX score group had lower ejection fraction (47.8±5.1 vs. 54.4±4.3, p= 0.04), lower TIMI flow 3 rate (76.47% vs 91.3%, p= 0.03 ) greater rate of MACE (29.4% vs. 4.3%, p=0.041), lower procedural success rate ( 76.47 vs. 91.3%, p= 0.046) compared to the low SYNTAX score group. ROC curve showed 77% sensitivity and 32% specificity for SYNTAX score when cut off value was 22 Performance test of SYNTEX score in the setting of Primary PCI outcome showed positive predictive value 83%. \nConclusions: SYNTAX score was an independent variable that can predict procedural outcomes \nBangladesh Heart Journal 2019; 34(1) : 5-10","PeriodicalId":247590,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SYNTAX Score on Procedural Outcome among Patient Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention\",\"authors\":\"S. Islam, Afzalur Rahman, A. Chowdhury, Mohsin Ahmed, K. K. Karmakar, M. U. Firoz, Mohammad Arifur Rahman, M. Haque, Mohammad Sadaqul Islam Sikdar, Ashrafuzzaman Tamal, A. Islam, Muhammad Ruhul Amin, Abeeda Tasnim Reza, F. Cader\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/BHJ.V34I1.41902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Limited contemporary data exist regarding the impact of SYNTAX score on procedural outcomes undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in acute STEMI patients. \\nObjectives: To evaluate the significance of the SYNTAX score for predicting procedural outcome after primary PCI in patient with acute STEMI. \\nMethods: This perspective observational study was conducted in the department of cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Dhaka, Bangladesh from September, 2015 to September, 2016. 42 patients with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI were considered for the study. But 2 patients were excluded from the study due to failure of primary PCI. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (low Syntax score d”22) and Group II (high Syntax score > 22). The Syntax score of all patients were calculated from an initial coronary angiogram before primary PCI. Procedural outcome was observed in between two groups. \\nResults: Among study patients 57.5% were in SYNTAX score d”22 (Group I) and 42.5% were in SYNTAX score >22 (Group II). Among traditional cardiovascular risk factors diabetes was significantly more prevalent in the Group II than Group I ( 82.4% vs 34.8%, p  0.003). Angiographic profile revealed maximum (69.6% vs 17.6%) culprit lesion in LAD artery in Group I and maximum culprit lesion (64.7% vs 21.7%) in RCA in Group II, these were the statistically significant between Group I and Group II (P<0.05). The high SYNTAX score group had lower ejection fraction (47.8±5.1 vs. 54.4±4.3, p= 0.04), lower TIMI flow 3 rate (76.47% vs 91.3%, p= 0.03 ) greater rate of MACE (29.4% vs. 4.3%, p=0.041), lower procedural success rate ( 76.47 vs. 91.3%, p= 0.046) compared to the low SYNTAX score group. ROC curve showed 77% sensitivity and 32% specificity for SYNTAX score when cut off value was 22 Performance test of SYNTEX score in the setting of Primary PCI outcome showed positive predictive value 83%. \\nConclusions: SYNTAX score was an independent variable that can predict procedural outcomes \\nBangladesh Heart Journal 2019; 34(1) : 5-10\",\"PeriodicalId\":247590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/BHJ.V34I1.41902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/BHJ.V34I1.41902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:目前关于SYNTAX评分对急性STEMI患者行初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)预后影响的数据有限。目的:评价SYNTAX评分对急性STEMI患者首次PCI术后预后的预测意义。方法:本前瞻性观察研究于2015年9月至2016年9月在孟加拉国达卡国立心血管疾病研究所心内科进行。42例接受首次PCI治疗的急性STEMI患者被纳入研究。但2例患者因首次PCI失败而被排除在研究之外。将患者分为两组:1组(低语法评分d " 22)和2组(高语法评分> 22)。所有患者的句法评分是根据首次PCI前的初始冠状动脉造影计算的。观察两组患者的手术结局。结果:57.5%的患者SYNTAX评分为d”22分(I组),42.5%的患者SYNTAX评分>22分(II组)。在传统心血管危险因素中,II组糖尿病患病率明显高于I组(82.4% vs 34.8%, p  0.003)。血管造影显示,ⅰ组LAD动脉罪魁祸首病变最大(69.6% vs 17.6%),ⅱ组RCA罪魁祸首病变最大(64.7% vs 21.7%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。SYNTAX评分高组射血分数较低(47.8±5.1比54.4±4.3,p=0.04), TIMI flow 3率较低(76.47%比91.3%,p= 0.03), MACE较高(29.4%比4.3%,p=0.041),手术成功率较低(76.47比91.3%,p= 0.046)。当截断值为22时,ROC曲线显示SYNTAX评分的敏感性为77%,特异性为32%。Primary PCI转归设置时,SYNTEX评分的性能测试阳性预测值为83%。结论:SYNTAX评分是一个可以预测手术结果的独立变量;34(1): 5-10
SYNTAX Score on Procedural Outcome among Patient Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Background: Limited contemporary data exist regarding the impact of SYNTAX score on procedural outcomes undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in acute STEMI patients.
Objectives: To evaluate the significance of the SYNTAX score for predicting procedural outcome after primary PCI in patient with acute STEMI.
Methods: This perspective observational study was conducted in the department of cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Dhaka, Bangladesh from September, 2015 to September, 2016. 42 patients with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI were considered for the study. But 2 patients were excluded from the study due to failure of primary PCI. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (low Syntax score d”22) and Group II (high Syntax score > 22). The Syntax score of all patients were calculated from an initial coronary angiogram before primary PCI. Procedural outcome was observed in between two groups.
Results: Among study patients 57.5% were in SYNTAX score d”22 (Group I) and 42.5% were in SYNTAX score >22 (Group II). Among traditional cardiovascular risk factors diabetes was significantly more prevalent in the Group II than Group I ( 82.4% vs 34.8%, p  0.003). Angiographic profile revealed maximum (69.6% vs 17.6%) culprit lesion in LAD artery in Group I and maximum culprit lesion (64.7% vs 21.7%) in RCA in Group II, these were the statistically significant between Group I and Group II (P<0.05). The high SYNTAX score group had lower ejection fraction (47.8±5.1 vs. 54.4±4.3, p= 0.04), lower TIMI flow 3 rate (76.47% vs 91.3%, p= 0.03 ) greater rate of MACE (29.4% vs. 4.3%, p=0.041), lower procedural success rate ( 76.47 vs. 91.3%, p= 0.046) compared to the low SYNTAX score group. ROC curve showed 77% sensitivity and 32% specificity for SYNTAX score when cut off value was 22 Performance test of SYNTEX score in the setting of Primary PCI outcome showed positive predictive value 83%.
Conclusions: SYNTAX score was an independent variable that can predict procedural outcomes
Bangladesh Heart Journal 2019; 34(1) : 5-10