美国政治秩序中的宗教自由与天主教:捍卫真理

Steven J. Brust
{"title":"美国政治秩序中的宗教自由与天主教:捍卫真理","authors":"Steven J. Brust","doi":"10.5840/CSSR2018237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that although Catholics are experiencing restrictions on their religious freedom, they should not couch their response primarily in terms of religious freedom because that tends to frame the issue as a conflict between unreasonable religious beliefs, on the one hand, and reasonable and scientifically based laws and policies, on the other. Rather, Catholics should focus more on demonstrating that the specific laws and policies that restrict religious freedom are not rooted in objective reality and so are unjust. In this vein, this paper explores how the meanings of words such as “rights” are abused and used in such a way as to establish unjust laws, and encourages Catholics to demonstrate how their objections to unjust laws are rooted in reason and the best scientific inquiry, not mere religious belief.","PeriodicalId":348926,"journal":{"name":"The Catholic Social Science Review","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious Freedom and Catholicism in the American Political Order: In Defense of Truth\",\"authors\":\"Steven J. Brust\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/CSSR2018237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that although Catholics are experiencing restrictions on their religious freedom, they should not couch their response primarily in terms of religious freedom because that tends to frame the issue as a conflict between unreasonable religious beliefs, on the one hand, and reasonable and scientifically based laws and policies, on the other. Rather, Catholics should focus more on demonstrating that the specific laws and policies that restrict religious freedom are not rooted in objective reality and so are unjust. In this vein, this paper explores how the meanings of words such as “rights” are abused and used in such a way as to establish unjust laws, and encourages Catholics to demonstrate how their objections to unjust laws are rooted in reason and the best scientific inquiry, not mere religious belief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Catholic Social Science Review\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Catholic Social Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/CSSR2018237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Catholic Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/CSSR2018237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,尽管天主教徒的宗教自由正在受到限制,但他们不应该主要从宗教自由的角度来表达自己的回应,因为这往往会将问题框定为不合理的宗教信仰与合理、科学的法律和政策之间的冲突。相反,天主教徒应该更加注重证明限制宗教自由的具体法律和政策不是基于客观现实,是不公正的。在这种情况下,本文探讨了诸如“权利”等词的含义是如何被滥用的,并以这种方式被用来建立不公正的法律,并鼓励天主教徒证明他们对不公正法律的反对是如何植根于理性和最好的科学探究,而不仅仅是宗教信仰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Religious Freedom and Catholicism in the American Political Order: In Defense of Truth
This article argues that although Catholics are experiencing restrictions on their religious freedom, they should not couch their response primarily in terms of religious freedom because that tends to frame the issue as a conflict between unreasonable religious beliefs, on the one hand, and reasonable and scientifically based laws and policies, on the other. Rather, Catholics should focus more on demonstrating that the specific laws and policies that restrict religious freedom are not rooted in objective reality and so are unjust. In this vein, this paper explores how the meanings of words such as “rights” are abused and used in such a way as to establish unjust laws, and encourages Catholics to demonstrate how their objections to unjust laws are rooted in reason and the best scientific inquiry, not mere religious belief.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liberal Authoritarianism Charles Zeiders and Peter Devlin, Malignant Narcissism and Power:A Psychodynamic Exploration of Madness and Leadership The Promise and Danger of National Conservatism Marie Gayle, Blandine Chelini-Pont, and Mark J. Rozell, editors, Catholics and US Politics after the 2020 Elections: Understanding the “Swing Vote” Corporate America’s Embrace of Wokism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1