2014-2017年格雷厄姆·格林利夫《亚洲数据隐私法——贸易和人权视角》的更新

G. Greenleaf
{"title":"2014-2017年格雷厄姆·格林利夫《亚洲数据隐私法——贸易和人权视角》的更新","authors":"G. Greenleaf","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3000766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In July 2017 I published on SSRN an update from mid-2014 to mid-2017 of my Asian Data Privacy Laws – Trade and Human Rights Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 2014), to accompany the publication of the paperback edition in July 2017. This further update aims to cover developments to 31 October 2018. \n \nThe content of this update first covers International Agreements affecting privacy which are of relevance to Asia. Summaries follow of developments in the fifteen months prior to November 2018 from any of the 26 jurisdictions in Asia, considered region-by-region (North-East Asia; South-East Asia; and South Asia). \n \nThis period has been a very significant one for Asian data privacy laws, with the most important developments being: \n \n* The anti-privacy provisions in the 'new TPP', the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) free trade agreement; \n \n* The initial impact of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on Asian jurisdictions; \n \n* The draft adequacy decision concerning japan, by the European Commission; \n \n* Amendments to Korea's 'Network Act', and their significance for Korea's adequacy applicaition to the EU; \n \n* Strongly GDPR-influenced draft Bills in both Thailand and Indonesia; \n \n* Vietnam's Cybersecurity Law and its strong data localisation provisions; \n \n* The Indian Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Puttaswamy v Union of India that India has a fundamental constitutional right of privacy, and its decision by majority a year later that India's biometric ID system, the Aadhaar, while constitutionally capable of validity, was implemented by legislation which is in part invalid; \n \n* The Report by the India's Srikrishna Committee, and its GDPR and Chinese influenced draft data protection Bill.","PeriodicalId":198853,"journal":{"name":"Compliance & Risk Management eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2014-2017 Update to Graham Greenleaf's Asian Data Privacy Laws - Trade and Human Rights Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"G. Greenleaf\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3000766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In July 2017 I published on SSRN an update from mid-2014 to mid-2017 of my Asian Data Privacy Laws – Trade and Human Rights Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 2014), to accompany the publication of the paperback edition in July 2017. This further update aims to cover developments to 31 October 2018. \\n \\nThe content of this update first covers International Agreements affecting privacy which are of relevance to Asia. Summaries follow of developments in the fifteen months prior to November 2018 from any of the 26 jurisdictions in Asia, considered region-by-region (North-East Asia; South-East Asia; and South Asia). \\n \\nThis period has been a very significant one for Asian data privacy laws, with the most important developments being: \\n \\n* The anti-privacy provisions in the 'new TPP', the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) free trade agreement; \\n \\n* The initial impact of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on Asian jurisdictions; \\n \\n* The draft adequacy decision concerning japan, by the European Commission; \\n \\n* Amendments to Korea's 'Network Act', and their significance for Korea's adequacy applicaition to the EU; \\n \\n* Strongly GDPR-influenced draft Bills in both Thailand and Indonesia; \\n \\n* Vietnam's Cybersecurity Law and its strong data localisation provisions; \\n \\n* The Indian Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Puttaswamy v Union of India that India has a fundamental constitutional right of privacy, and its decision by majority a year later that India's biometric ID system, the Aadhaar, while constitutionally capable of validity, was implemented by legislation which is in part invalid; \\n \\n* The Report by the India's Srikrishna Committee, and its GDPR and Chinese influenced draft data protection Bill.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compliance & Risk Management eJournal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compliance & Risk Management eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3000766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compliance & Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3000766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2017年7月,我在SSRN上发表了2014年年中至2017年年中我的《亚洲数据隐私法-贸易与人权视角》(牛津大学出版社,2014年)的更新,并于2017年7月出版了平装版。此进一步更新旨在涵盖截至2018年10月31日的发展情况。本更新的内容首先涵盖与亚洲有关的影响隐私的国际协定。以下是亚洲26个司法管辖区中任何一个在2018年11月之前15个月的发展摘要,按地区考虑(东北亚;东南亚;和南亚)。这一时期是亚洲数据隐私法律的重要时期,最重要的发展是:*“新TPP”,即全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系(CPTPP)自由贸易协定中的反隐私条款;*欧盟《一般资料保护规例》(GDPR)对亚洲司法管辖区的初步影响;*欧洲委员会关于日本的适当决定草案;*韩国“网络法案”的修正案及其对韩国充分申请欧盟的意义;*泰国和印度尼西亚受gdp影响较大的法案草案;*越南《网络安全法》及其强有力的数据本地化规定;*印度最高法院在Puttaswamy诉印度联邦(Union of India)一案中一致裁定印度拥有宪法规定的基本隐私权,并在一年后以多数票裁定印度的生物识别身份系统Aadhaar虽然在宪法上具有有效性,但通过部分无效的立法实施;*印度斯里克里希纳委员会报告及其GDPR和受中国影响的数据保护法案草案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014-2017 Update to Graham Greenleaf's Asian Data Privacy Laws - Trade and Human Rights Perspectives
In July 2017 I published on SSRN an update from mid-2014 to mid-2017 of my Asian Data Privacy Laws – Trade and Human Rights Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 2014), to accompany the publication of the paperback edition in July 2017. This further update aims to cover developments to 31 October 2018. The content of this update first covers International Agreements affecting privacy which are of relevance to Asia. Summaries follow of developments in the fifteen months prior to November 2018 from any of the 26 jurisdictions in Asia, considered region-by-region (North-East Asia; South-East Asia; and South Asia). This period has been a very significant one for Asian data privacy laws, with the most important developments being: * The anti-privacy provisions in the 'new TPP', the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) free trade agreement; * The initial impact of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on Asian jurisdictions; * The draft adequacy decision concerning japan, by the European Commission; * Amendments to Korea's 'Network Act', and their significance for Korea's adequacy applicaition to the EU; * Strongly GDPR-influenced draft Bills in both Thailand and Indonesia; * Vietnam's Cybersecurity Law and its strong data localisation provisions; * The Indian Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Puttaswamy v Union of India that India has a fundamental constitutional right of privacy, and its decision by majority a year later that India's biometric ID system, the Aadhaar, while constitutionally capable of validity, was implemented by legislation which is in part invalid; * The Report by the India's Srikrishna Committee, and its GDPR and Chinese influenced draft data protection Bill.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Search and Screening Costs of Bribes The Need to Adopt Preventative Measures to Combat the Misappropriation of Retirement Fund Assets Data Privacy - The Ethical, Sociological, and Philosophical Effects of Cambridge Analytica Enterprise Risk Management: Benefits and Challenges Compliance Management Systems: Do They Make a Difference?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1