欧盟刑事制裁的定义

Jacob Öberg
{"title":"欧盟刑事制裁的定义","authors":"Jacob Öberg","doi":"10.5235/219174414809354837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article reviews how we should define criminal sanctions in EU law. The debate on the proper meaning of ‘criminal sanctions’ has in the first place received strong impetus in EU law, due to the newly gained competences of the Union in criminal law after the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. The second reason for the fuelling of a debate on the meaning of criminal sanctions is related to the EU’s envisaged accession to the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). It is obvious that the EU would need to adopt such procedural safeguards to conform to Article 6 of the Convention when they impose a sanction that can be properly defined as a criminal charge within the meaning of said provision. The article first analyse and clarify the distinction between the concept of criminal sanctions for the purposes of procedural guarantees and the concept of criminal sanctions for the purposes of EU competence in Article 83(2) TFEU. In the second place, the article develops a proper concept of criminal sanctions that can be applied both to determine the Union’s competence under Article 83(2) TFEU and also a definition that can be employed more generally to determine, for example, whether Member States indeed have complied with their obligations under EU law directives.","PeriodicalId":106035,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights & the Global Economy eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Definition of Criminal Sanctions in the EU\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Öberg\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/219174414809354837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article reviews how we should define criminal sanctions in EU law. The debate on the proper meaning of ‘criminal sanctions’ has in the first place received strong impetus in EU law, due to the newly gained competences of the Union in criminal law after the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. The second reason for the fuelling of a debate on the meaning of criminal sanctions is related to the EU’s envisaged accession to the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). It is obvious that the EU would need to adopt such procedural safeguards to conform to Article 6 of the Convention when they impose a sanction that can be properly defined as a criminal charge within the meaning of said provision. The article first analyse and clarify the distinction between the concept of criminal sanctions for the purposes of procedural guarantees and the concept of criminal sanctions for the purposes of EU competence in Article 83(2) TFEU. In the second place, the article develops a proper concept of criminal sanctions that can be applied both to determine the Union’s competence under Article 83(2) TFEU and also a definition that can be employed more generally to determine, for example, whether Member States indeed have complied with their obligations under EU law directives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Rights & the Global Economy eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Rights & the Global Economy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/219174414809354837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights & the Global Economy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/219174414809354837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文回顾了欧盟法律对刑事制裁的界定。关于“刑事制裁”的正确含义的辩论首先在欧盟法律中得到了强有力的推动,因为在《里斯本条约》批准后,欧盟在刑法方面获得了新的权限。关于刑事制裁意义的辩论愈演愈烈的第二个原因与欧盟设想加入《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR)有关。显然,欧盟在实施一项制裁时需要采取这种程序性保障措施,以符合《公约》第6条的规定,这种制裁可以适当地定义为上述条款意义内的刑事指控。本文首先分析和澄清了第83(2)条中以程序保障为目的的刑事制裁概念与以欧盟权限为目的的刑事制裁概念之间的区别。其次,该条发展了一个适当的刑事制裁概念,既可用于确定欧盟根据第83(2)条的权限,也可用于更普遍地确定,例如,成员国是否确实遵守了欧盟法律指令规定的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Definition of Criminal Sanctions in the EU
This Article reviews how we should define criminal sanctions in EU law. The debate on the proper meaning of ‘criminal sanctions’ has in the first place received strong impetus in EU law, due to the newly gained competences of the Union in criminal law after the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. The second reason for the fuelling of a debate on the meaning of criminal sanctions is related to the EU’s envisaged accession to the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). It is obvious that the EU would need to adopt such procedural safeguards to conform to Article 6 of the Convention when they impose a sanction that can be properly defined as a criminal charge within the meaning of said provision. The article first analyse and clarify the distinction between the concept of criminal sanctions for the purposes of procedural guarantees and the concept of criminal sanctions for the purposes of EU competence in Article 83(2) TFEU. In the second place, the article develops a proper concept of criminal sanctions that can be applied both to determine the Union’s competence under Article 83(2) TFEU and also a definition that can be employed more generally to determine, for example, whether Member States indeed have complied with their obligations under EU law directives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Protection Instruments and Women Workers in the Informal Economy: A Southern African Perspective Using the Risk-Based Approach To Curb Modern Slavery in the Supply Chain: The Anglo American and Marks and Spencer Example From Creative Destruction to Destructive Creation Economic Analysis of Ethnic Conflicts Why Is Law Central to Public Policy Process in Global South?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1