{"title":"美国广播管制的起源:一个修正主义理论","authors":"Charles H. Tillinghast","doi":"10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely believed that radio regulation imposed by the 1927 Radio Act was required to control signal interference that threatened broadcasting with a tragedy of the commons: too many stations producing interfering signals. Thomas W. Hazlett (1990, 2001) disputes this view, contending that powers adequate to cope with interference were already provided by the 1912 Radio Act, but, more important, that no such government regulation was needed to eliminate signal interference, a fact well known to policymakers of the period. This article evaluates Hazlett's claims.","PeriodicalId":331997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radio Studies","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Origins of American Broadcast Regulation: A Revisionist Theory\",\"authors\":\"Charles H. Tillinghast\",\"doi\":\"10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely believed that radio regulation imposed by the 1927 Radio Act was required to control signal interference that threatened broadcasting with a tragedy of the commons: too many stations producing interfering signals. Thomas W. Hazlett (1990, 2001) disputes this view, contending that powers adequate to cope with interference were already provided by the 1912 Radio Act, but, more important, that no such government regulation was needed to eliminate signal interference, a fact well known to policymakers of the period. This article evaluates Hazlett's claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radio Studies\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radio Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radio Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
人们普遍认为,1927年《无线电法案》(radio Act)实施的无线电管制是为了控制信号干扰,因为信号干扰威胁着广播,造成了“公地悲剧”:太多电台产生干扰信号。Thomas W. Hazlett(1991,2001)对这一观点提出异议,他认为1912年的《无线电法案》已经提供了足够的权力来应对干扰,但更重要的是,不需要这样的政府监管来消除信号干扰,这是当时政策制定者众所周知的事实。本文对Hazlett的观点进行了评价。
Origins of American Broadcast Regulation: A Revisionist Theory
It is widely believed that radio regulation imposed by the 1927 Radio Act was required to control signal interference that threatened broadcasting with a tragedy of the commons: too many stations producing interfering signals. Thomas W. Hazlett (1990, 2001) disputes this view, contending that powers adequate to cope with interference were already provided by the 1912 Radio Act, but, more important, that no such government regulation was needed to eliminate signal interference, a fact well known to policymakers of the period. This article evaluates Hazlett's claims.