夕阳西下,村绿时代

N. Pratt
{"title":"夕阳西下,村绿时代","authors":"N. Pratt","doi":"10.5750/DLJ.V26I0.930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United Kingdom Supreme Court has recently handed down the much anticipated judgment in R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council (“ Barkas ”). The case addressed the “by right” defence in village green law and whether use that is pursuant to a statutory right could be use “as of right” for the purposes of village green registration. The court unanimously ruled that use “by right” could not be considered as use “as of right” and would not be qualifying use for the purposes of registration.  Use will be “by right” when it is pursuant to a statutory right to use the land, and is usually engaged when the land in question is in public ownership. In reaching this judgment the court overruled the previous authority of R (Beresford) v Sunderland City Council (“ Beresford” ) . The Supreme Court left many questions unanswered, although the culmination of recent activity in village green law now makes it considerably harder to register new greens.  The inability to protect recreational spaces through village green registration potentially makes this land available for development, thus tipping the balance in favour of the economic aim, at the expense of the social and environmental aims, of sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":382436,"journal":{"name":"The Denning Law Journal","volume":"28 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The setting of the sun on the village green era\",\"authors\":\"N. Pratt\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/DLJ.V26I0.930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United Kingdom Supreme Court has recently handed down the much anticipated judgment in R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council (“ Barkas ”). The case addressed the “by right” defence in village green law and whether use that is pursuant to a statutory right could be use “as of right” for the purposes of village green registration. The court unanimously ruled that use “by right” could not be considered as use “as of right” and would not be qualifying use for the purposes of registration.  Use will be “by right” when it is pursuant to a statutory right to use the land, and is usually engaged when the land in question is in public ownership. In reaching this judgment the court overruled the previous authority of R (Beresford) v Sunderland City Council (“ Beresford” ) . The Supreme Court left many questions unanswered, although the culmination of recent activity in village green law now makes it considerably harder to register new greens.  The inability to protect recreational spaces through village green registration potentially makes this land available for development, thus tipping the balance in favour of the economic aim, at the expense of the social and environmental aims, of sustainable development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Denning Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Denning Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V26I0.930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Denning Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V26I0.930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国最高法院最近宣布了备受期待的R (Barkas)诉北约克郡议会(“Barkas”)一案的判决。本案涉及乡村绿化法中的“正当权利”辩护,以及根据法定权利的使用是否可以作为乡村绿化登记的“正当权利”使用。法院一致裁定,“依法”使用不能被视为“依法”使用,也不能作为注册目的的合格使用。根据土地的法定使用权使用土地时,使用将是“按权利”使用,而当有关土地属于公共所有时,通常是“按权利”使用。在达成这一判决时,法院推翻了R(贝雷斯福德)诉桑德兰市议会(“贝雷斯福德”)的先前权威。最高法院留下了许多悬而未决的问题,尽管最近乡村环保法的高潮使得登记新的绿色植物变得相当困难。由于无法通过乡村绿色登记来保护休闲空间,这可能会使这些土地可供开发,从而打破平衡,有利于经济目标,以牺牲可持续发展的社会和环境目标为代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The setting of the sun on the village green era
The United Kingdom Supreme Court has recently handed down the much anticipated judgment in R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council (“ Barkas ”). The case addressed the “by right” defence in village green law and whether use that is pursuant to a statutory right could be use “as of right” for the purposes of village green registration. The court unanimously ruled that use “by right” could not be considered as use “as of right” and would not be qualifying use for the purposes of registration.  Use will be “by right” when it is pursuant to a statutory right to use the land, and is usually engaged when the land in question is in public ownership. In reaching this judgment the court overruled the previous authority of R (Beresford) v Sunderland City Council (“ Beresford” ) . The Supreme Court left many questions unanswered, although the culmination of recent activity in village green law now makes it considerably harder to register new greens.  The inability to protect recreational spaces through village green registration potentially makes this land available for development, thus tipping the balance in favour of the economic aim, at the expense of the social and environmental aims, of sustainable development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Are the Legal Mechanisms for Seeking Solutions to Disparities in the Delivery of Care in the NHS and Where Does Liability Lie? Beneficial Ownership of the Family Home Apologies and the Legacy of an Unlawful Application of Terra Nullius in Terra Australis Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Contemporary Asian Reading of a Seminal Text ‘Not My Employee, Not My Liability’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1