降低麻醉期间医院感染风险的创新方法

T. C. Davis, M. Jamerson, Sarah A. Marrs, Ronsard Daniel, C. Biddle
{"title":"降低麻醉期间医院感染风险的创新方法","authors":"T. C. Davis, M. Jamerson, Sarah A. Marrs, Ronsard Daniel, C. Biddle","doi":"10.29074/ascls.120.002246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infection control concerns abound in the surgical anesthesia workstation placing patients and providers at significant, documented risk as a result of many factors including provider hand hygiene lapses, equipment design and complexity, and challenging disinfection. We performed a trial to mitigate cross-contamination involving 30 general anesthesia surgical cases matched 1:1 as control (no intervention) or intervention group (condom-like barriers to four anesthesia workstation components that are frequently touched and contaminated, and very difficult to disinfect). Wraps were removed at case end, then replaced with fresh ones before the start of the subsequent case. Baseline culture samples were obtained prior to the first surgical case of the day in each room, then performed on cases that followed in each room over a 3-day period. Baseline colony formation units density was equivalent in both conditions with total density significantly lower in the covered/wrapped (Mean Rank = 5.81) vs uncovered condition (Mean Rank = 11.19) at p","PeriodicalId":263458,"journal":{"name":"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Approach to Moderating Risk of Nosocomial Infection During Anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"T. C. Davis, M. Jamerson, Sarah A. Marrs, Ronsard Daniel, C. Biddle\",\"doi\":\"10.29074/ascls.120.002246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Infection control concerns abound in the surgical anesthesia workstation placing patients and providers at significant, documented risk as a result of many factors including provider hand hygiene lapses, equipment design and complexity, and challenging disinfection. We performed a trial to mitigate cross-contamination involving 30 general anesthesia surgical cases matched 1:1 as control (no intervention) or intervention group (condom-like barriers to four anesthesia workstation components that are frequently touched and contaminated, and very difficult to disinfect). Wraps were removed at case end, then replaced with fresh ones before the start of the subsequent case. Baseline culture samples were obtained prior to the first surgical case of the day in each room, then performed on cases that followed in each room over a 3-day period. Baseline colony formation units density was equivalent in both conditions with total density significantly lower in the covered/wrapped (Mean Rank = 5.81) vs uncovered condition (Mean Rank = 11.19) at p\",\"PeriodicalId\":263458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.120.002246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.120.002246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术麻醉工作站的感染控制问题大量存在,由于许多因素,包括提供者的手部卫生失误、设备设计和复杂性以及具有挑战性的消毒,使患者和提供者处于重大的、有记录的风险中。我们进行了一项减少交叉污染的试验,涉及30例全麻手术病例,对照(无干预)和干预组(四个经常接触和污染且很难消毒的麻醉工作站组件的安全套状屏障),比例为1:1。包装在案件结束时被拆除,然后在随后的案件开始之前换上新的包装。在每个房间当天的第一例手术病例之前获得基线培养样本,然后在每个房间进行为期3天的后续病例。基线菌落形成单位密度在两种情况下都是相等的,在p。覆盖/包裹条件下(平均Rank = 5.81)的总密度显著低于未覆盖条件(平均Rank = 11.19)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovative Approach to Moderating Risk of Nosocomial Infection During Anesthesia
Infection control concerns abound in the surgical anesthesia workstation placing patients and providers at significant, documented risk as a result of many factors including provider hand hygiene lapses, equipment design and complexity, and challenging disinfection. We performed a trial to mitigate cross-contamination involving 30 general anesthesia surgical cases matched 1:1 as control (no intervention) or intervention group (condom-like barriers to four anesthesia workstation components that are frequently touched and contaminated, and very difficult to disinfect). Wraps were removed at case end, then replaced with fresh ones before the start of the subsequent case. Baseline culture samples were obtained prior to the first surgical case of the day in each room, then performed on cases that followed in each room over a 3-day period. Baseline colony formation units density was equivalent in both conditions with total density significantly lower in the covered/wrapped (Mean Rank = 5.81) vs uncovered condition (Mean Rank = 11.19) at p
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influences of Patient Characteristics on the Predictive Value of Molecular Biomarkers of Colon Cancer in Tubular Adenomas Molecular Action of ADAMTS-13 and Transfusion Therapies of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Presence of Group B Streptococcus in Raw and Dehydrated Placentas Leveraging Creativity to Teach Science: Incorporating Sketchnotes in Medical Laboratory Science Curriculum Demonstration of the Nanopore MinION DNA Sequencer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1