{"title":"一种测量声波接收机方向特性的脉冲近场技术","authors":"G. D. Harris, D. G. Shombert","doi":"10.1109/T-SU.1985.31668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"near-field plane-wave pulses can he used to produce a complementary uncertainty also can introduce in measurement of response pattern; i.e., response vs. frequency at a constant angle, as opposed to response vs. angle at a constant frequency. Directional am- the phase response, particularly in the megahertz freplitude and phase responses in the 1-10 MHz range have been obtained quency range [31, [51. Another possible inaccuracy is reusing this method for miniature ultrasonic hydrophones (sl mm di- lated to the effect of the temperature variations on the ameter). The pulsed waveforms measured by the hydrophone were dig- measurement of the directional phase response. More will itized and Fourier-transformed. Normalization with respect to the hydrophone’s on-axis response was accomplished by a simple spectral subtraction procedure. The angular and frequency resolutions of the technique are typically 0.25” and 100 kHz, respectively. From these data of measuring the plane-wave directivity pattern has been be said on these potential phase errors later. To eliminate these potential errors, an alternate method an effective hydrophone radius as a function of frequency can be computed more quickly and efficiently than would be possible using present practices.","PeriodicalId":371797,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pulsed Near-Field Technique for Measuring the Directional Characteristics of Acoustic Receivers\",\"authors\":\"G. D. Harris, D. G. Shombert\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/T-SU.1985.31668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"near-field plane-wave pulses can he used to produce a complementary uncertainty also can introduce in measurement of response pattern; i.e., response vs. frequency at a constant angle, as opposed to response vs. angle at a constant frequency. Directional am- the phase response, particularly in the megahertz freplitude and phase responses in the 1-10 MHz range have been obtained quency range [31, [51. Another possible inaccuracy is reusing this method for miniature ultrasonic hydrophones (sl mm di- lated to the effect of the temperature variations on the ameter). The pulsed waveforms measured by the hydrophone were dig- measurement of the directional phase response. More will itized and Fourier-transformed. Normalization with respect to the hydrophone’s on-axis response was accomplished by a simple spectral subtraction procedure. The angular and frequency resolutions of the technique are typically 0.25” and 100 kHz, respectively. From these data of measuring the plane-wave directivity pattern has been be said on these potential phase errors later. To eliminate these potential errors, an alternate method an effective hydrophone radius as a function of frequency can be computed more quickly and efficiently than would be possible using present practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/T-SU.1985.31668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/T-SU.1985.31668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Pulsed Near-Field Technique for Measuring the Directional Characteristics of Acoustic Receivers
near-field plane-wave pulses can he used to produce a complementary uncertainty also can introduce in measurement of response pattern; i.e., response vs. frequency at a constant angle, as opposed to response vs. angle at a constant frequency. Directional am- the phase response, particularly in the megahertz freplitude and phase responses in the 1-10 MHz range have been obtained quency range [31, [51. Another possible inaccuracy is reusing this method for miniature ultrasonic hydrophones (sl mm di- lated to the effect of the temperature variations on the ameter). The pulsed waveforms measured by the hydrophone were dig- measurement of the directional phase response. More will itized and Fourier-transformed. Normalization with respect to the hydrophone’s on-axis response was accomplished by a simple spectral subtraction procedure. The angular and frequency resolutions of the technique are typically 0.25” and 100 kHz, respectively. From these data of measuring the plane-wave directivity pattern has been be said on these potential phase errors later. To eliminate these potential errors, an alternate method an effective hydrophone radius as a function of frequency can be computed more quickly and efficiently than would be possible using present practices.