利用多目标可得性对系统风险预测进行回溯测试

Tobias Fissler, Y. Hoga
{"title":"利用多目标可得性对系统风险预测进行回溯测试","authors":"Tobias Fissler, Y. Hoga","doi":"10.1080/07350015.2023.2200514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systemic risk measures such as CoVaR, CoES and MES are widely-used in finance, macroeconomics and by regulatory bodies. Despite their importance, we show that they fail to be elicitable and identifiable. This renders forecast comparison and validation, commonly summarised as `backtesting', impossible. The novel notion of \\emph{multi-objective elicitability} solves this problem. Specifically, we propose Diebold--Mariano type tests utilising two-dimensional scores equipped with the lexicographic order. We illustrate the test decisions by an easy-to-apply traffic-light approach. We apply our traffic-light approach to DAX~30 and S\\&P~500 returns, and infer some recommendations for regulators.","PeriodicalId":118766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Economic Statistics","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backtesting Systemic Risk Forecasts using Multi-Objective Elicitability\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Fissler, Y. Hoga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07350015.2023.2200514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systemic risk measures such as CoVaR, CoES and MES are widely-used in finance, macroeconomics and by regulatory bodies. Despite their importance, we show that they fail to be elicitable and identifiable. This renders forecast comparison and validation, commonly summarised as `backtesting', impossible. The novel notion of \\\\emph{multi-objective elicitability} solves this problem. Specifically, we propose Diebold--Mariano type tests utilising two-dimensional scores equipped with the lexicographic order. We illustrate the test decisions by an easy-to-apply traffic-light approach. We apply our traffic-light approach to DAX~30 and S\\\\&P~500 returns, and infer some recommendations for regulators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business & Economic Statistics\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business & Economic Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2023.2200514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Economic Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2023.2200514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

CoVaR、CoES和MES等系统性风险指标在金融、宏观经济学和监管机构中被广泛使用。尽管它们很重要,但我们表明它们不能被引出和识别。这使得预测比较和验证(通常被概括为“回溯测试”)变得不可能。\emph{多目标适格性}的新概念解决了这一问题。具体地说,我们提出了Diebold—Mariano类型测试,使用配备字典顺序的二维分数。我们通过一种易于应用的红绿灯方法来说明测试决策。我们将红绿灯方法应用于DAX 30和标准普尔500指数的回报,并对监管机构提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Backtesting Systemic Risk Forecasts using Multi-Objective Elicitability
Systemic risk measures such as CoVaR, CoES and MES are widely-used in finance, macroeconomics and by regulatory bodies. Despite their importance, we show that they fail to be elicitable and identifiable. This renders forecast comparison and validation, commonly summarised as `backtesting', impossible. The novel notion of \emph{multi-objective elicitability} solves this problem. Specifically, we propose Diebold--Mariano type tests utilising two-dimensional scores equipped with the lexicographic order. We illustrate the test decisions by an easy-to-apply traffic-light approach. We apply our traffic-light approach to DAX~30 and S\&P~500 returns, and infer some recommendations for regulators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decomposition of Differences in Distribution under Sample Selection and the Gender Wage Gap Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predicatable Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters Estimation of the Local Conditional Tail Average Treatment Effect* Forecasting Inflation Using Economic Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1