损益不对称下的风险定价

Marianne Andries
{"title":"损益不对称下的风险定价","authors":"Marianne Andries","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3433953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asset prices are derived in closed-form in a framework where agents evaluate risk with gain-loss asymmetry: losses relative to a reference point incur discontinuously more disutility than comparable gains. This asymmetry has a dual impact. First, a level effect: risk prices are made higher by the kink in the preferences. Second, a cross-sectional effect: the pricing of risk is higher (lower) for safer (riskier) assets, so expected returns increase non-linearly with the risk-exposures. This second effect, a crucial departure from standard smooth utility models, is weakened by lower specifications of the reference point and by higher volatilities in aggregate risk.","PeriodicalId":187811,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Pricing Under Gain-Loss Asymmetry\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Andries\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3433953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Asset prices are derived in closed-form in a framework where agents evaluate risk with gain-loss asymmetry: losses relative to a reference point incur discontinuously more disutility than comparable gains. This asymmetry has a dual impact. First, a level effect: risk prices are made higher by the kink in the preferences. Second, a cross-sectional effect: the pricing of risk is higher (lower) for safer (riskier) assets, so expected returns increase non-linearly with the risk-exposures. This second effect, a crucial departure from standard smooth utility models, is weakened by lower specifications of the reference point and by higher volatilities in aggregate risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"259 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3433953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3433953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

资产价格是在一个框架中以封闭形式推导出来的,在这个框架中,代理人以损益不对称的方式评估风险:相对于参考点的损失会比可比收益不连续地产生更多的负效用。这种不对称有双重影响。首先是水平效应:偏好的扭曲使风险价格更高。第二,横截面效应:对于更安全(风险更高)的资产,风险定价更高(更低),因此预期收益随着风险暴露呈非线性增长。第二种效应是与标准平滑实用新型的重要区别,但由于参考点规格较低和总风险波动较大而减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Pricing Under Gain-Loss Asymmetry
Asset prices are derived in closed-form in a framework where agents evaluate risk with gain-loss asymmetry: losses relative to a reference point incur discontinuously more disutility than comparable gains. This asymmetry has a dual impact. First, a level effect: risk prices are made higher by the kink in the preferences. Second, a cross-sectional effect: the pricing of risk is higher (lower) for safer (riskier) assets, so expected returns increase non-linearly with the risk-exposures. This second effect, a crucial departure from standard smooth utility models, is weakened by lower specifications of the reference point and by higher volatilities in aggregate risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Euro Area Banks' Interest Rate Risk Exposure to Level, Slope and Curvature Swings in the Yield Curve 15 Seconds to Alpha: Higher frequency risk pricing for commercial real estate securities Bank Signaling, Risk of Runs, and the Informational Impact of Prudential Regulations Climate Default Swap – Disentangling the Exposure to Transition Risk Through CDS Sovereign Risk, Credit Shocks and R&D
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1